F-Type ( X152 ) 2014 - Onwards

Future F-Type news just keeps getting better!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 1, 2014 | 02:22 PM
  #1  
MaximA's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Veteran Member
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,011
Likes: 492
From: Miami
Default Future F-Type news just keeps getting better!

Jag is hard at work on a killer F-Type, this is getting better by the week.

Jaguar
 
Reply
Old May 1, 2014 | 07:28 PM
  #2  
schraderade's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 402
From: San Francisco
Default

Originally Posted by MaximA
Jag is hard at work on a killer F-Type, this is getting better by the week.

Jaguar
I really hope they don't move forward with the 4 cylinder model, unless it's for very specific weird markets like Singapore.
That is simply too much brand dilution.
 
Reply
Old May 1, 2014 | 09:38 PM
  #3  
ungineer's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 115
Likes: 37
From: Fort Worth, TX
Default

Originally Posted by schraderade
I really hope they don't move forward with the 4 cylinder model, unless it's for very specific weird markets like Singapore.
That is simply too much brand dilution.
Agreed. I thought it would've been better for the V8 and V6 to be a bit more visually distinct from each other as well.
 
Reply
Old May 1, 2014 | 10:17 PM
  #4  
schraderade's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 402
From: San Francisco
Default

Originally Posted by ungineer
Agreed. I thought it would've been better for the V8 and V6 to be a bit more visually distinct from each other as well.
Agreed. It wouldn't have been that hard to style the two more differently.
 
Reply
Old May 2, 2014 | 09:51 AM
  #5  
DJS's Avatar
DJS
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 6,996
Likes: 2,665
From: Metrowest Boston
Default

I found it interesting that the preproduction V8 convertibles had a V8 label on the back, which they got rid of for the production models.
 
Reply
Old May 2, 2014 | 05:01 PM
  #6  
pragmatic's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 204
Likes: 43
From: Tuxedo, NY
Default

Originally Posted by schraderade
I really hope they don't move forward with the 4 cylinder model, unless it's for very specific weird markets like Singapore.
That is simply too much brand dilution.
If it comes it will come to the US. The latest EPA report on auto manufacturers fuel economy (greenhouse gas emissions) Jaguar/Rover was the only OEM not to have credits to carry forward to cover their low fuel economy in future years. They will need to sell a number of higher fuel economy cars by the end of 2015 or pay their competitors for credits.

The real problem is the F type is heavy and they are not getting enough power out of their turbo 4. Ford will have over 300hp from their 2.3 turbo while Jaguar is only offering a 240hp 2.0T in their cars. If they could have gotten the car a couple of 100 ponds lighter and gotten 300 hp from the four cylinder performance would be acceptable.
 
Reply
Old May 2, 2014 | 05:45 PM
  #7  
schraderade's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 402
From: San Francisco
Default

Do you have a link to the EPA report?
It'd be interesting to look at.

Makes sense that Jag would want to meet its carbon credit obligations, but choosing the F-Type as the model to do that with seems bass ackwards to me. Why do that with a sports car when it could focus on a fuel efficient sedan instead like the XE
 
Reply
Old May 2, 2014 | 06:40 PM
  #8  
pragmatic's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 204
Likes: 43
From: Tuxedo, NY
Default

The report is here

http://www.epa.gov/otaq/climate/documents/420r14011.pdf

Not easy reading, the regulations are written to allow maximum trading (both internal and external) while keeping pressure on improving fuel economy. Jaguar is taking an alternative certification path that somewhat limits trading but buys time at the beginning (before 2016) in exchange for higher standards later (2016 -2021).

Yes the XE will be the primary method Jag will use to meet the higher fuel economy standards but I'd like to see lighter high fuel economy vehicles across the board.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pringleblue
F-Type ( X152 )
27
Jan 12, 2021 11:42 PM
Delta66
New Member Area - Intro a MUST
3
Oct 4, 2015 05:40 PM
DFW
F-Type ( X152 )
15
Oct 1, 2015 07:22 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:10 AM.