F-Type ( X152 ) 2014 - Onwards

Jaguar F Type R dilemma

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 18, 2015 | 09:23 AM
  #1  
Ridgeback's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 6
Likes: 1
Default Jaguar F Type R dilemma

I have been eyeing the FTR for the past 4 months. I test drove it the other day. Awesome handling, performance, and exhaust sound. Beautiful exterior, which is hard to beat. I was looking to order the FTR with carbon ceramic brakes.
My biggest hang up is the interior. I am having a hard time getting over the fake carbon ceramic look, the cheap plastic parts, and lack of technology. Yes I understand the sport car purists just care about the driving experience, but I would expect a luxury brand like Jaguar for $120k to be much better quality. Btw, I own a 2012 XFR with beautiful real carbon fiber interior and lack of cheap plastic parts that I paid $86k new.
I also wanted to check out the Merc GT S AMG so I drove across the street to the MB dealer. They didn't have the GT S but what caught my eye was a black on black new model GLE 63s AMG coupe for $120k loaded. I know it is a completely different car then the FTR, but interior was beautiful and technology was amazing. 5.5L biturbo V8 with 577 HP 561 lb torque. It had the AMG performance exhaust on it which sounded almost like the FTR. Handling and driving experience is different bc it's 5200lbs.

Why doesn't Jaguar step up and put at least the same type of quality interior as the XFR that costs $20-30k less?i Is there any other luxury brand that sells a car for over $100k and puts that type of interior in it? l will probably wait for the 2017 model to come out to see if anything changes. Your guys thoughts on this? Anyone else bothered by this?
 
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2015 | 09:52 AM
  #2  
RickyJay52's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 3,468
Likes: 1,800
From: Northeast
Default

I'll let others expound in a more detailed if not articulate way - and, for the most part, I see where you're coming from (literally and figuratively) - but here's my quick take:

It is what it is.

A stunning automobile regardless of it's shortcomings. (Assuming one thinks it has many or any). I love mine!
 
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2015 | 10:22 AM
  #3  
Frenchy's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 187
Likes: 29
From: OH
Default pardon my tautology (it is what it is)

Yet another post on "why isn't the F-Type something other than what it is?"

Every car has pros and cons. You're "hung up" on the F-Type R's interior; you're "having a hard time getting over it." You've noticed that other cars have better interiors and/or better technology.

Solutions:
1. Buy another car.
2. If you decide that the pro-con mix is better in the F-Type R than in any of the competitors, buy an F-Type.

"Anyone else bothered by this (the interior)?" you ask. Why should that matter to you? It would be your car.
 
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2015 | 10:55 AM
  #4  
Stohlen's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 661
From: Detroit, MI
Default

I never felt that the F type had a low quality interior, (aside from the fake carbon fiber like center console pieces which can easily be replaced by the real version jaguar offers) so i'm always surprised to see most everyone feels this way. As far as technology goes, the F type wasn't intended to be a grand tourer with adaptive this and automatic that... its not intended to be a luxury car, just like a 911, or Mclaren or whatever. From what it sounds like, you're looking for something with more technology/luxury than beauty/performance. That being said, the F type probably isn't the car for you.
 
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2015 | 11:25 AM
  #5  
F-typical's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 179
From: Herefordshire, England
Default

On the technology question:

I run a 2002 330 coupe as a shopping car. I've owned it for over 3 years now, and literally only discovered today that it has cruise control.

If toys are your thing, there are better cars - even amongst Jaguar's range.

😎
 
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2015 | 12:38 PM
  #6  
StealthPilot's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 910
Likes: 148
From: South east
Default

Originally Posted by Stohlen
I never felt that the F type had a low quality interior, (aside from the fake carbon fiber like center console pieces which can easily be replaced by the real version jaguar offers) so i'm always surprised to see most everyone feels this way. As far as technology goes, the F type wasn't intended to be a grand tourer with adaptive this and automatic that... its not intended to be a luxury car, just like a 911, or Mclaren or whatever. From what it sounds like, you're looking for something with more technology/luxury than beauty/performance. That being said, the F type probably isn't the car for you.
Well it's all in the eye of what your internal benchmark is. But for me it is definitely a low quality interior. The center console in particular looks very cheap, and so do the AC Vents. I also think the gauge cluster looks very cheap.
 
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2015 | 01:13 PM
  #7  
shift's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,056
Likes: 584
From: San Francisco
Default

cost issue...Jag probably calculated that a nicer interior would make the F-Type $10-$20K more expensive. At that price point they probably calculated that it would hurt sales. I do agree that he interior is lacking compared to cars costing 1/2 as much.
 
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2015 | 01:13 PM
  #8  
Foosh's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 6,176
Likes: 1,039
From: Maryland, USA
Default

Originally Posted by StealthPilot
Well it's all in the eye of what your internal benchmark is. But for me it is definitely a low quality interior. The center console in particular looks very cheap, and so do the AC Vents. I also think the gauge cluster looks very cheap.
Right, and based upon many of your postings since you took delivery, my perception has been that perhaps it's not the right car for you either. That's certainly not a criticism, it's just about the characteristics of a vehicle that are important for any given person.

I agree it's not as nice as the interior in my wife's less expensive '15 C300, but I don't care. As far as I'm concerned, it is attractive, certainly acceptable, very comfortable, does everything I want it to do, and suits the type of car it is.
 
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2015 | 02:51 PM
  #9  
CaptainHam's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 326
Likes: 57
From: SW London, UK
Default

I wish my S had adaptive cruise, a much better infotainment system, a built-in tea maker, and probably a couple of other things...but I knew all of that before I ordered, so they clearly weren't showstoppers and so I can't complain now (and I'm most definitely not).

Most of all, I bought it because it looks awesome, and drives even better, and the interior is certainly not an unpleasant place to be.

If you have that many hang-ups with it, it's clearly not the car for you. And I wouldn't bother waiting for the 2017, I doubt you'll get anything significant to resolve all your issues.
 
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2015 | 03:07 PM
  #10  
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 16,948
Likes: 4,727
From: Maryland, US
Default

I didn't realize that the honeycomb etching on the dash was even supposed to be emulating CF. In fact, it is so far removed, to me, it just looks like an interesting texture quite suited for a higher end sports car.
 
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2015 | 03:14 PM
  #11  
CaptainHam's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 326
Likes: 57
From: SW London, UK
Default

Originally Posted by lhoboy
I didn't realize that the honeycomb etching on the dash was even supposed to be emulating CF. In fact, it is so far removed, to me, it just looks like an interesting texture quite suited for a higher end sports car.
Yeah, I don't buy the faiux CF effect either. It's called Hex and is clearly not even close to replicating CF, it just is what it is.
 
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2015 | 03:46 PM
  #12  
Foosh's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 6,176
Likes: 1,039
From: Maryland, USA
Default

There's also a light hex. It's not supposed to be emulating CF, it's aluminum. Looks classy and expensive to me.

 

Last edited by Foosh; Oct 18, 2015 at 03:48 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2015 | 04:09 PM
  #13  
DFW's Avatar
DFW
Member
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 54
Likes: 23
From: Ft. Worth, TX
Default

These posts always make me laugh - especially from the "I'm thinking about buying an F Type but it's not a _______." Hey, maybe it's not the car for you - especially if the interior of a two-seater is a big draw.


I'll say this - no one has ever entered my Jag and said "Gee, what an average interior." They usually say "Can we slow down a little?" To which I respond "Hold on to the chicken handle in the middle."
 
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2015 | 07:38 PM
  #14  
TR64ever's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 433
Likes: 89
From: Westfield, NJ USA
Default

Exterior style is what grabbed me.
If you think the interior isn't up to MB standards and the exterior isn't moving your soul, buy the MB.
 
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2015 | 07:49 PM
  #15  
Mulmur's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,420
Likes: 265
From: Mulmur, Ontario, Canada
Default

I like the interior of my R ... it feels good, comfortable and functional.

Although it took me a about 2 weeks of driving the car to really notice the interior.. too busy having fun.

Lawrence.
 
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2015 | 08:51 PM
  #16  
bjg625's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,992
Likes: 248
From: las vegas
Default

I like the interior, I don't seem to notice all these little complaints. The carbon fiber on my SLK55 was a $2400 extra as it is on Porsche, Audi R8, etc. I paid extra to get the extended leather and the brogue interior, part of the market. The base XF is very plain you have to model up to get nicer, even an XFR is still a XF, nice but not a sports car with active suspension, it is much older XK engineering. Kia's have great upgrade interiors on some models, their strength.
 
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2015 | 11:34 PM
  #17  
SoCalJagS's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 643
Likes: 92
Default

Try finding another car in the F types class for $120000 with carbon ceramic brakes with a better interior?
 
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2015 | 11:38 PM
  #18  
LynxFX's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 969
Likes: 270
From: Las Vegas
Default

Originally Posted by lhoboy
I didn't realize that the honeycomb etching on the dash was even supposed to be emulating CF. In fact, it is so far removed, to me, it just looks like an interesting texture quite suited for a higher end sports car.
I agree and I like it a lot. I'm getting a little tired of the carbon fiber look...even though I replaced every piece of plastic on my Triumph Speed Triple R with it.
 
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2015 | 08:16 AM
  #19  
ajmarton's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 176
Likes: 24
From: Los Angeles
Default

I had a 2012 XFR and now the F Type convertible S V8. The interior is all sports car. I love the retro look and thought that went into the design. Touch sensitive light switch, interior mood lighting, vent pop up, toggle style switches and console knobs. Reminds me of my older Porsches. Here in Los Angeles AMGs are driven by Iranians and there are plenty of them. Not so with the Jag. I get a compliment at least once a week on the Jag and it's a 2014 MY.
 
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2015 | 10:05 AM
  #20  
Schwabe's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 445
From: Grasonville, MD
Default

It is whatever is important to you. There is no agreeing. I would like the performance of a turbo S, the interior of a Vantage V12S roadster, the sound of a Italia 458 for the price of the F-Type.
The Jag drives circles around the AM but does not have the exclusivity or interior looks. This weekend I went to Pocono Raceway for a roll race. My XKR-S with over 600hp got its azz handed even by Mazda 3s etc. Made me think about another 997.2 turbo S build just for that ... then again, it was starting in the low 30s with even some flurries and here is a shot of my dash ...


Name:  IMG_20151017_094901.jpg
Views: 2266
Size:  1.04 MB


so I was quite comfortable with heated seats and steering wheel, drove my car home, not on a trailer but was not really able to put up a fight... that moment I wanted a faster car ... but that is just a moment of my car ownership, not even 1% of my driving every year. The other times when I go on a drive with my friends I have a unique car, always stands out, is always at the front of the power spectrum, is comfortable, sounds awesome, easy to drive and handle and makes me happy all around. So see what you use your car the most for. If the interior is such a drag and you have maybe company in your car a lot you may want something else on the other hand unless you get a GT S no Benz will handle like the F-Type. I have red interior and the CF center console, I agree that the cover for the cup holder is chintzy but the rest looks fantastic IMHO.


here is a link to the CF console thread, not everyone's cup of tea but available ... https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/f...onsole-138737/
 

Last edited by Schwabe; Oct 19, 2015 at 10:08 AM.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:14 AM.