F-Type ( X152 ) 2014 - Onwards
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Not enough downforce?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 04-07-2016, 02:54 PM
Telecom's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 36
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Not enough downforce?

I find that when I am traveling above 120mph, the front end seems a little too light.
When I push to 140, bumps in the road make me a bit nervous.

Is this all in my head? I am assuming the car has enough down-force to make it stable at high speeds.

Does anyone have any similar experiences?
 

Last edited by Telecom; 04-07-2016 at 03:04 PM.
  #2  
Old 04-07-2016, 04:00 PM
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Maryland, US
Posts: 16,939
Received 4,652 Likes on 3,362 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Telecom
I find that when I am traveling above 120mph, the front end seems a little too light.
When I push to 140, bumps in the road make me a bit nervous.

Is this all in my head? I am assuming the car has enough down-force to make it stable at high speeds.

Does anyone have any similar experiences?
More info needed. Which model do you have? (that's why you should put it in your signature)
 
The following users liked this post:
jaguny (04-07-2016)
  #3  
Old 04-07-2016, 04:04 PM
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 8,638
Received 4,446 Likes on 2,425 Posts
Default

I heard this from a couple of owners.

My own opinion is that the rear spoiler introduces too much downforce on the rear, which makes the front end light.

It would be interesting to make some tests with the spoiler disconnected and see what difference it makes to the balance of the car.
 
  #4  
Old 04-07-2016, 04:08 PM
MeanKity's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 13
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Unhingd
More info needed. Which model do you have? (that's why you should put it in your signature)
https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/f...stions-152122/

Apparently a 2014 base.
 
  #5  
Old 04-07-2016, 04:19 PM
Dremorg's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: New York
Posts: 996
Received 116 Likes on 99 Posts
Default

Got mine to 162mph a while ago. Felt planted to me.
 
  #6  
Old 04-07-2016, 05:35 PM
Telecom's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 36
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Signature updated.. Thank you.

I have yet to be under the car to see if the splitter/ difuser is functional or just cosmetic.
 
The following users liked this post:
Unhingd (04-07-2016)
  #7  
Old 04-07-2016, 07:05 PM
LynxFX's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 969
Received 270 Likes on 148 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dremorg
Got mine to 162mph a while ago. Felt planted to me.
Been in the 160's as well, quite stable. Still haven't done above that yet.

120-130 almost feels like normal highway cruising speed.
 
  #8  
Old 04-07-2016, 07:22 PM
AnD3rew's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 952
Received 172 Likes on 124 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cambo
I heard this from a couple of owners.

My own opinion is that the rear spoiler introduces too much downforce on the rear, which makes the front end light.

It would be interesting to make some tests with the spoiler disconnected and see what difference it makes to the balance of the car.
Since it is a spoiler and not a wing it seems unlikely, a spoiler just stops the cars aerodynamics from getting lift, it doesn't actually induce downforce.
 
  #9  
Old 04-07-2016, 07:57 PM
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Maryland, US
Posts: 16,939
Received 4,652 Likes on 3,362 Posts
Default

Could this be a vert specific issue?

BTW, to avoid a massive (and unproductive) discussion on semantics:

reduced lift equals increased (gravity induced) down force.

Wings create aerodynamically produced down force and spoilers (which we have) reduce aerodynamically produced lift across the top surface of the car.
 

Last edited by Unhingd; 04-07-2016 at 08:05 PM.
The following users liked this post:
AnD3rew (04-08-2016)
  #10  
Old 04-07-2016, 08:40 PM
psb1013's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Chicago, IL.
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 42 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dremorg
Got mine to 162mph a while ago. Felt planted to me.

Is this on a track or on a public street?
 
  #11  
Old 04-07-2016, 09:26 PM
IronMike's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Southern Cal
Posts: 682
Received 243 Likes on 153 Posts
Default

Run my 2015 R Coupe up to 150/155 in multiple spurts on city streets and felt solid, secure and firmly planted. Have had one opportunity to do 140 give or take for an extended uninterrupted run on a wide open stretch of California highway lasting about 20 miles. Coupe could not have been more smooth. She seems to absolutely sing with delight in the 135 to 145 range.
 
  #12  
Old 04-07-2016, 09:34 PM
SinF's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Canada, eh
Posts: 6,987
Received 2,141 Likes on 1,461 Posts
Default

Tires make a lot of difference and inflating them to spec makes even more difference. Float-y feel could be sidewalls partially collapsing. I find dash PSI values on my car off by couple PSI, so I am not sure you could trust them.
 
  #13  
Old 04-07-2016, 09:50 PM
psb1013's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Chicago, IL.
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 42 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

I don't know if some of you guys are a little nuts or a bit lucky (or maybe both).....155 mph on city streets?! WTF?!

Several years ago, my crazy nephew in his brand new Mustang GT did 100 mph on a 20 mph "school zone." During one of his "runs," he almost ran over a bunch of kids crossing the street while filming his exploits on his smartphone. Needless to say, he was caught and ticketed by the cops. His car was impounded, license revoked for 2 years, and spent 2 nights in the slammer before getting out on bond. He was very lucky he didn't do additional jail time in the county prison.

Where I live and work, there are cops everywhere. I'll be lucky if I get my car even up to 50 mph before attracting attention.

NEVER race on city streets. The consequences are not worth it. Take it to the track and let it fly. That's what it's there for.
 

Last edited by psb1013; 04-08-2016 at 12:26 AM.
The following 3 users liked this post by psb1013:
Foosh (04-07-2016), SinF (04-07-2016), Unhingd (04-07-2016)
  #14  
Old 04-07-2016, 09:57 PM
Foosh's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 6,177
Received 1,026 Likes on 854 Posts
Default

Yep, what he said above.

I don't know if it's a convertible only issue or not, and I have no intention of finding out. I didn't purchase a base V6 hoping to do triple digits on my daily commute or fun road trips. I have a fair amount of track experience, and I knew full well when I bought it, that this ain't no track car.
 

Last edited by Foosh; 04-07-2016 at 09:59 PM.
  #15  
Old 04-08-2016, 04:19 AM
AnD3rew's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 952
Received 172 Likes on 124 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Unhingd
Could this be a vert specific issue?

BTW, to avoid a massive (and unproductive) discussion on semantics:

reduced lift equals increased (gravity induced) down force.

Wings create aerodynamically produced down force and spoilers (which we have) reduce aerodynamically produced lift across the top surface of the car.
Sorry but I do t think that shuts the discussion down, it just perpetuates it. And it is kind of semantics BUT: in my understanding all the spoiler does is stop the car getting lighter due to aerodynamic lift. So it will Bring the car back towards it's normal standing still gravity induced weight but it won't add extra downforce which a wing will do. In other words, yes there is more weight on the road with the spoiler deployed at speed than without, but it is not additional downforce it is just canceling out the lift.
 
The following users liked this post:
amcdonal86 (04-08-2016)
  #16  
Old 04-08-2016, 05:22 AM
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Maryland, US
Posts: 16,939
Received 4,652 Likes on 3,362 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AnD3rew
Sorry but I do t think that shuts the discussion down, it just perpetuates it. And it is kind of semantics BUT: in my understanding all the spoiler does is stop the car getting lighter due to aerodynamic lift. So it will Bring the car back towards it's normal standing still gravity induced weight but it won't add extra downforce which a wing will do. In other words, yes there is more weight on the road with the spoiler deployed at speed than without, but it is not additional downforce it is just canceling out the lift.
You and I are in violent agreement. Unfortunately Jaguar publicizes it as 264 lbs. of downforce (Spoiler Spoils Classic Lines - 2015 Jaguar F-Type R Coupe Long-Term Road Test) when they should be claiming 264 lbs. of reduced lift. But that's like advertising that it doesn't suck as badly.
 

Last edited by Unhingd; 04-08-2016 at 05:27 AM.
The following users liked this post:
AnD3rew (04-09-2016)
  #17  
Old 04-08-2016, 07:49 AM
Dremorg's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: New York
Posts: 996
Received 116 Likes on 99 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by psb1013
Is this on a track or on a public street?
Highway. I never speed on city streets because of pedestrians.
 
  #18  
Old 04-08-2016, 07:56 AM
SinF's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Canada, eh
Posts: 6,987
Received 2,141 Likes on 1,461 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Foosh
I have a fair amount of track experience, and I knew full well when I bought it, that this ain't no track car.
I disagree. F-type is more than capable of fun times on the track.
 
  #19  
Old 04-08-2016, 09:25 AM
Foosh's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 6,177
Received 1,026 Likes on 854 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SinF
I disagree. F-type is more than capable of fun times on the track.
I didn't say it wasn't. I said it "ain't no track car."

I'd choose something significantly less fat for that.
 
The following users liked this post:
SinF (04-08-2016)
  #20  
Old 04-08-2016, 09:26 AM
Foosh's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 6,177
Received 1,026 Likes on 854 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dremorg
Highway. I never speed on city streets because of pedestrians.
LOL . . . last time I checked, those are public streets with other traffic.

Speeding is one thing, and I'm sure we all do it to some extent. However, 155 mph is criminal on any public road.
 

Last edited by Foosh; 04-08-2016 at 09:28 AM.


Quick Reply: Not enough downforce?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:46 PM.