F-Type ( X152 ) 2014 - Onwards

Official Jaguar F-Type Picture Post Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 8, 2020 | 11:11 AM
  #2981  
enderle's Avatar
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,852
Likes: 703
From: Bend, OR
Default

I personally like the look of the spoiler, won't get one myself because I also like the fact ours retracts, but I do think the spoiler blends well with the lines and look of the car. Then again I'm kind of a huge fan of mods anyway. I think people should make their cars uniquely there own and certainly live that credo. Anyway, my 6 cents is I like it.
 
Reply
Old May 8, 2020 | 12:07 PM
  #2982  
F-Type-Type's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 144
Likes: 35
From: Gentofte, Denmark
Default

Originally Posted by Ftypelover
Very distracting addition to an otherwise beautifully proportioned vehicle. Maybe okay for a track day if removeable, but more befitting a ricer IMHO.
It's all a matter of taste.... However, the guys at Special Vehicle Operations clearly disagree with you since they made this very same deployable carbon wing standard equipment on the SVR
 
Reply
Old May 8, 2020 | 12:13 PM
  #2983  
F-Type-Type's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 144
Likes: 35
From: Gentofte, Denmark
Default

Thanks for the comments. Actually I erroneously called it a spoiler - but it isn't a spoiler, it's a wing (upside-down wing). Like the standard spoiler, it deploys (tilts) at 95kmh and moves back to the position on the first photo when the speed drops under 60kmh. Us in Europe can also choose to have it deployed at all times during driving and stillstand (I believe the US model has a cleaning position but cannot be permanently deployed while on the move?).
 

Last edited by F-Type-Type; May 8, 2020 at 12:17 PM.
Reply
Old May 8, 2020 | 09:23 PM
  #2984  
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 16,948
Likes: 4,728
From: Maryland, US
Default

Originally Posted by F-Type-Type
Thanks for the comments. Actually I erroneously called it a spoiler - but it isn't a spoiler, it's a wing (upside-down wing). Like the standard spoiler, it deploys (tilts) at 95kmh and moves back to the position on the first photo when the speed drops under 60kmh. Us in Europe can also choose to have it deployed at all times during driving and stillstand (I believe the US model has a cleaning position but cannot be permanently deployed while on the move?).
I do believe it is a spoiler, just like all the other F-Type spoilers (coupe and Vert). The cross section does not appear to be an airfoil, but rather a consistent thickness fore to aft (just curved upward toward the rear).
 

Last edited by Unhingd; May 8, 2020 at 09:25 PM.
Reply
Old May 8, 2020 | 11:45 PM
  #2985  
BruceTheQuail's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 4,110
Likes: 1,396
From: Gold Coast, Oz
Default

I quite like it. Unlike virtually everyone else, I'n not a lover of the tail of the F Type. Hips maybe, tail no. The wing/spoiler takes my eye away from the protruding lip which is more prominent looking with the centre exhaust.
 
Reply
Old May 9, 2020 | 02:36 AM
  #2986  
F-Type-Type's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 144
Likes: 35
From: Gentofte, Denmark
Talking

Originally Posted by Unhingd
I do believe it is a spoiler, just like all the other F-Type spoilers (coupe and Vert). The cross section does not appear to be an airfoil, but rather a consistent thickness fore to aft (just curved upward toward the rear).
Its an inverted wing alright, with aerofoil cross-sectional shape, see attached photos and a screenshot from the 2017 MY brochure explaining the effect of the upside-down wing. According to the SVO guys, it brings a drag coefficient improvement of 7,5 % and a lift coefficient reduction of 45% ("stowed") and 2,5% and 15% (deployed) - see brochure screenshot. The F-type really needs all de improved aero on the rear end that it can get since the lift at the rear end at speed is so significant that an error signal from the wing actuator will cause the ECU to limit the speed of the vehicle to 215 km/h (133 mph)!!! Moreover, when opting for the wing delete on the SVR coupe the top speed is reduced from 200 mph to 185mph, which again shows that the wing is not just a decorative item.
My main reason for installing it was the significant reduction in the lift coefficient to get better grip at the rear end in fast curves and my well-calibrated popometer clearly detected a significant improvement :-) On top of that, I was positively surprised by the looks after the install, especially in real life on the road this wing gives the car a more exclusive presence.


 

Last edited by F-Type-Type; May 9, 2020 at 02:44 AM.
Reply
Old May 9, 2020 | 04:12 PM
  #2987  
FIRE550's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 138
Likes: 55
From: Clinton, NY
Default

I've been 172 mph in my car with the stock deployable spoiler. No error message here!
 
Reply
Old May 10, 2020 | 01:34 AM
  #2988  
F-Type-Type's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 144
Likes: 35
From: Gentofte, Denmark
Default

Originally Posted by FIRE550
I've been 172 mph in my car with the stock deployable spoiler. No error message here!
I did not intent to say that exceeding133 mph will give an error message if you have the deployable spoiler and not the wing. Let me rephrase: The car is limited to 133 mph ONlLY if the ECU receives a signal from the spoiler actuator that the spoiler cannot be deployed. I assume that your spoiler was deployed and there was no spoiler deployment error message when you had your 172 mph fun so it all makes sense.
So much for spoiler deployment error.
Regarding having a wing or a spoiler: The SVR is limited to 185 mph when it has been fitted (buyer choice) from factory with the deployable spoiler instead of the ”standard” deployable wing (with the deployable wing fitted from factory the top speed of the SVR is 200 mph). I mentioned this to illustrate that the wing has a real effect and is not purely ornamental. I did not intend to say that the F-type cannot exceed 133 mph WO the wing.
 
Reply
Old May 10, 2020 | 05:23 AM
  #2989  
scm's Avatar
scm
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 4,806
Likes: 1,775
From: Southampton, UK
Default

Originally Posted by F-Type-Type
I did not intent to say that exceeding133 mph will give an error message if you have the deployable spoiler and not the wing.
I didn't think you did say that - you clearly stated that the limit was only when the spoiler system was faulty.
 
Reply
Old May 10, 2020 | 10:52 AM
  #2990  
FIRE550's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 138
Likes: 55
From: Clinton, NY
Default

Originally Posted by scm
I didn't think you did say that - you clearly stated that the limit was only when the spoiler system was faulty.
Haha - yea that happened! Emphasis on * that an error

 

Last edited by FIRE550; May 10, 2020 at 11:02 AM.
Reply
Old May 10, 2020 | 01:32 PM
  #2991  
F-Type-Type's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 144
Likes: 35
From: Gentofte, Denmark
Default

Originally Posted by FIRE550
Haha - yea that happened! Emphasis on * that an error
?!? The point you ate trying to make being?
 
Reply
Old May 10, 2020 | 02:05 PM
  #2992  
FIRE550's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 138
Likes: 55
From: Clinton, NY
Default

Originally Posted by F-Type-Type
?!? The point you ate trying to make being?
Point is.
That member SCM is stating " you clearly stated that the limit was only when the spoiler system was faulty".
In which you did not, thus the reason I posted that I've been 172 mph in my car with the stock spoiler. When I quoted SCM I put your post in there and circled the part where you say it limits your speed to 133 mph, nothing about a faulty spoiler. So I laughed in his post because you never said that.
You did correct yourself in the post to me, all good! However then that member posted that, so I thought it was funny.
Get it now?
 
Reply
Old May 10, 2020 | 02:10 PM
  #2993  
scm's Avatar
scm
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 4,806
Likes: 1,775
From: Southampton, UK
Default

Originally Posted by FIRE550
Point is.
That member SCM is stating " you clearly stated that the limit was only when the spoiler system was faulty".
In which you did not ...
Ah, I see the bit you missed from the original post:
"... the lift at the rear end at speed is so significant that an error signal from the wing actuator will cause the ECU to limit the speed of the vehicle to 215 km/h (133 mph)"

Note the words "error signal from the wing actuator" clearly stating the system is faulty.
 
Reply
Old May 10, 2020 | 02:22 PM
  #2994  
F-Type-Type's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 144
Likes: 35
From: Gentofte, Denmark
Default

Originally Posted by scm
Ah, I see the bit you missed from the original post:
"... the lift at the rear end at speed is so significant that an error signal from the wing actuator will cause the ECU to limit the speed of the vehicle to 215 km/h (133 mph)"

Note the words "error signal from the wing actuator" clearly stating the system is faulty.
Alright, let's allow this threat to go back to its intended purpose of enjoying pictures of the fantastic F-type
 
Reply
Old May 10, 2020 | 03:50 PM
  #2995  
FIRE550's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 138
Likes: 55
From: Clinton, NY
Default

Originally Posted by F-Type-Type
Alright, let's allow this threat to go back to its intended purpose of enjoying pictures of the fantastic F-type
Listen guys I'm not trying to start any fuss. I took @F-Type-Type post as the car wouldn't exceed 133 mph with the stock spoiler. In which I have been over 170 in my car with the stock deployable spoiler. So if I took it wrong my deepest apologies, didn't mean to upset anybody.
 
Reply
Old May 10, 2020 | 03:56 PM
  #2996  
FIRE550's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 138
Likes: 55
From: Clinton, NY
Default

Originally Posted by scm
Ah, I see the bit you missed from the original post:
"... the lift at the rear end at speed is so significant that an error signal from the wing actuator will cause the ECU to limit the speed of the vehicle to 215 km/h (133 mph)"

Note the words "error signal from the wing actuator" clearly stating the system is faulty.
I'll be done on this petty matter now but I just want to point out one thing.
* Note that he says WILL CAUSE !
To me that means it is going to happen, not could happen.
Enough said - carry on!
 
Reply
Old May 10, 2020 | 05:39 PM
  #2997  
scm's Avatar
scm
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 4,806
Likes: 1,775
From: Southampton, UK
Default

Originally Posted by FIRE550
* Note that he says WILL CAUSE !
To me that means it is going to happen, not could happen.
Agreed. If there's a fault in the wing actuator system.
 
Reply
Old May 10, 2020 | 05:55 PM
  #2998  
FIRE550's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 138
Likes: 55
From: Clinton, NY
Default

Originally Posted by scm
Agreed. If there's a fault in the wing actuator system.
 
Reply
Old May 10, 2020 | 06:08 PM
  #2999  
scm's Avatar
scm
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 4,806
Likes: 1,775
From: Southampton, UK
Default

I accept your apology.
 
Reply
Old May 10, 2020 | 06:10 PM
  #3000  
FIRE550's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 138
Likes: 55
From: Clinton, NY
Default

Originally Posted by scm
I accept your apology.

 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:40 AM.