F-Type ( X152 ) 2014 - Onwards

Pricing a 2014 V8s F?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 2, 2019 | 02:39 PM
  #21  
Donovan Halstead's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Jaaaggg
I hope you are joking, but you are wrong about many of these statements.

"it's the best sports car of all time and the fastest F-Type ever made" - Best sports car ever is an opinion and you can believe that, but it's not the fastest F-Type ever made. 2016+ R and SVR are AWD and they hit 60 in mid 3s and quarter miles in mid 11s. The V8S will have a tough time breaking 12s on a good day with great tires.

"The V8 S is the fastest Jag ever because wi 555 BHP at 3650 pounds" - Again no, not the fastest and no it does not weight 3650 lbs (this is probably dry weight). There is a thread on the forum where members weighed their cars, and the V8S was around ~3950 lbs. The base V6 is around 3650 and V6S coming in around ~3850.

"All V8 F-Types are low 3 sec/low 11 sec cars." - No, only the AWD variants can realistically hit low 3s and 11s.

All that being said, V8S is the best value F-Type purchase. And you're right about them actually making closer to 550 hp and just being underrated from Jaguar. But, no need to claim or believe that it's faster than the other variants.
cool, thanks. I’m less concerned about flat speed these days than I am about something that is going to be a kick in the *** and quick, but fun to drive and not going to be a headache maintenance wise. When it gets up to 60-70-80k miles I don’t want to be driving an expensive hand grenade.
 
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2019 | 04:17 PM
  #22  
David Meier's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 126
Likes: 44
From: Bradenton, FL
Default

Originally Posted by Donovan Halstead
Would you good folks please help me with a general ballpark price on the car? Are the V8s desirable? Are they terrible? Should I consider this auto?

Thank you very much in advance.
I just bought a 2015 V8S Convertible with 16K miles in near mint condition outside of Philadelphia. I had made an offer at a local Maserati dealer of $44K for a similar car and was turned down. I ended up getting what I wanted for $41K. Keep in mind, you'll likely need to replace tires, change fluids, etc at that age. Since I did a lot of shopping recently I would say in my area a good deal 2014 would likely be in the $38K range for that car. Since you say it's a friend I would hope he would do at least that for you considering he doesn't have to deal with trying to sell it. Good luck!
 
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2019 | 03:40 AM
  #23  
RacerX's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 857
Likes: 226
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by Jaaaggg
I hope you are joking, but you are wrong about many of these statements.

"it's the best sports car of all time and the fastest F-Type ever made" - Best sports car ever is an opinion and you can believe that, but it's not the fastest F-Type ever made. 2016+ R and SVR are AWD and they hit 60 in mid 3s and quarter miles in mid 11s. The V8S will have a tough time breaking 12s on a good day with great tires.

"The V8 S is the fastest Jag ever because wi 555 BHP at 3650 pounds" - Again no, not the fastest and no it does not weight 3650 lbs (this is probably dry weight). There is a thread on the forum where members weighed their cars, and the V8S was around ~3950 lbs. The base V6 is around 3650 and V6S coming in around ~3850.

"All V8 F-Types are low 3 sec/low 11 sec cars." - No, only the AWD variants can realistically hit low 3s and 11s.
The V8 S is does 3.6/11.7 with P-Zeros and a half second faster with tires. It's lightness is an advantage.
 
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2019 | 09:49 AM
  #24  
Chrissyg's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 20
Likes: 20
From: London
Default

Originally Posted by RacerX
The V8 S is does 3.6/11.7 with P-Zeros and a half second faster with tires. It's lightness is an advantage.
I've heard this a lot - absolutely not trying to dispute this/argue, but is there any actual evidence of the V8S doing such times? I've looked/searched through threads and have only ever found claims, and no actual proof.
 
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2019 | 11:42 AM
  #25  
RacerX's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 857
Likes: 226
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by Chrissyg
I've heard this a lot - absolutely not trying to dispute this/argue, but is there any actual evidence of the V8S doing such times? I've looked/searched through threads and have only ever found claims, and no actual proof.
Edmunds original 2014 V8 S reviewer actually tried, a little, instead of parroting Jag's 4.2 for the V8 S and 3.9 for later AWD Rs like 99% of reviewers. With DSC "off" they list 3.6/11.9 for the original V8 S, noting it was 0.8 second faster than their 911 cabrio.

But the reviewer did not understand that DSC long presses to off, so ignition was retarded. He couldn't have replaced the OEM P-Zeros which would have lit up RWD through 5th gear anyway. With DSC truly off and tires, I hope to post under 3 secs w/Dragy and below 11 when low DA season comes around, with Racechip and a SC pulley. VAP and a lower pulley will have to wait for my warranty to expire. I'm switching tires from MP4S to either Sport Cup2s or R888Rs. Currently I'm running 3.3-4 (1ft) and 11.2-4 with traction troubles off the line unless I'm in DSC track mode
 

Last edited by RacerX; Oct 6, 2019 at 11:48 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2019 | 03:40 PM
  #26  
Jaaaggg's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 444
Likes: 133
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

Originally Posted by RacerX
The V8 S is does 3.6/11.7 with P-Zeros and a half second faster with tires. It's lightness is an advantage.
Can you point me to a non magazine record of someone achieving these numbers with a stock V8S? I am not sure how 3900+ lbs is lightness. Here is a forum members V8S that weighed in at 3930 lbs with a half tank of gas (https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/f...-point-129743/).
 
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2019 | 03:45 PM
  #27  
Chawumba's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 800
Likes: 243
From: So Cal
Default

Originally Posted by Chrissyg
I've heard this a lot - absolutely not trying to dispute this/argue, but is there any actual evidence of the V8S doing such times? I've looked/searched through threads and have only ever found claims, and no actual proof.

Here is what appears to be a rather unbiased test of a stock RWD F type R getting an 11.8 in the quarter mile on P Zero's - and its captured on film:

Having had both P Zero's and PS4S's on my car, I'd be shocked if there wasn't an additional 1/3 to 1/2 second to be gained by swapping the tires alone. I found the car difficult to enjoy with P Zero's but a truly epic beast with the PS4S tires.

But the real magic of the RWD R is that after a quick 150 lb weight reduction and the addition of the 600 hp VAP tune, the car really begins to feel like a sports car, instead of a relatively heavy GT.
 
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2019 | 04:09 PM
  #28  
Chawumba's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 800
Likes: 243
From: So Cal
Default

Originally Posted by Jaaaggg
I am not sure how 3900+ lbs is lightness..
Sadly, this is the car's achilles heal. Unhinged has a good thread with numerous members having their weighed their cars and it wasn't pretty. If I recall correctly, the RWD R coupes averaged around 3850 lbs, the convertible was about an 80 lb penalty, and AWD another 180 lbs.
 
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2019 | 04:45 PM
  #29  
RacerX's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 857
Likes: 226
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by Jaaaggg
Can you point me to a non magazine record of someone achieving these numbers with a stock V8S? I am not sure how 3900+ lbs is lightness. Here is a forum members V8S that weighed in at 3930 lbs with a half tank of gas (https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/f...-point-129743/).
zeroto60.com lists a stock V8 S at 3.7 on P-Zero RWD ice skates. But I doubt they understand the nuances of our traction control modes and the need for a two stage RWD launch. Tires and experience are certainly allowable in a stock config, especially when the car ships with cheap passenger tires that cost less than half of comparable tires in class.

AWD negates the cheap tire issue, even passenger car tires can handle 137 HP/wheel.

As far as the lightness, the V8 S is lighter if it's lighter than later model V8's.
 
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2019 | 03:07 PM
  #30  
DPelletier's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 1,571
Likes: 334
From: kelowna
Default

My 2014 V8S weighed in at 3846 lbs on a certified scale; yeah, definitely not light but lighter than the AWD units and with less driveline losses. Best 0 - 60 I've seen was 3.6 seconds.....personally I doubt you'd get a half second better out of a stock V8S even with slicks, maybe a 1-2 tenths with better tires.

I prefer the RWD F types myself due to the lighter weight, lower CG and less driveline losses. Project 7 would be my "cream of the crop", of course, followed by the 2015 V8R RWD and then the 2014 V8S.

Dave
 
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2019 | 12:23 AM
  #31  
RacerX's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 857
Likes: 226
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by DPelletier
My 2014 V8S weighed in at 3846 lbs on a certified scale; yeah, definitely not light but lighter than the AWD units and with less driveline losses. Best 0 - 60 I've seen was 3.6 seconds.....personally I doubt you'd get a half second better out of a stock V8S even with slicks, maybe a 1-2 tenths with better tires.

I prefer the RWD F types myself due to the lighter weight, lower CG and less driveline losses. Project 7 would be my "cream of the crop", of course, followed by the 2015 V8R RWD and then the 2014 V8S.

Dave
The standard 0-60 reported by magazines is 1 ft rollout adjusted for 0 DA. Draggy shows a 3.6 sec run has a 1ft rollout time of 3.35 secs with my V8 S. Then magazines would subtract about 0.1 secs for each +2000' of DA.
 

Last edited by RacerX; Oct 10, 2019 at 12:28 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sperandeo
F-Type ( X152 )
10
Sep 19, 2017 05:00 PM
1192
F-Type ( X152 )
9
Aug 2, 2017 11:06 AM
t7s
F-Type ( X152 )
17
May 24, 2017 04:17 PM
schraderade
F-Type ( X152 )
4
Jun 19, 2014 06:19 PM
themacs
F-Type ( X152 )
7
May 24, 2014 11:17 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:01 PM.