F-Type ( X152 ) 2014 - Onwards

Very disappointed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 16, 2014 | 12:17 PM
  #1  
sn4p's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 25
Likes: 3
Unhappy Very disappointed

Test drove two cars yesterday: Mercedes C63 AMG and Jaguar F-Type Coupe V6S.

The merc was really awesome you could feel the torque, great engine sound and acceleration.

The F-Type however was a great disappointment (apart from the looks department). I put it in dynamic mode and floored it, but it felt no quicker or responsive than my Audi TT (2.0 turbo). The sound from the engine was also very smooth, I was expecting more of a growl.

Unfortunately they only had the V6S as a demo car so I couldn't try the V8. Unless it is a very different animal I'm probably going to look for another alternative. Also the price tag here in Mexico for a Type R with options is like $165,000 USD, very pricey, so it has to be exceptional for that kind of money. I just don't see it...

Just wanted to share this sad experience.
 
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2014 | 12:24 PM
  #2  
swajames's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 906
Likes: 228
From: San Diego, CA
Default

Don't like, don't buy.

Next.
 
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2014 | 12:32 PM
  #3  
digitalrurouni's Avatar
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 63
Likes: 7
From: Atlanta
Default

I had the same experience but I have not written off the Jag yet cause I have not driven the V8. Also the Merc you mentioned has a big V8 with a lot more grunt that the Jag with a V6 supercharged or not. So you gotta give the Jag a break. Now there is no way you would be disappointed with the V8 that I am sure of.
 
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2014 | 12:38 PM
  #4  
schraderade's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 402
From: San Francisco
Default

If you're looking for straight line acceleration then this is a predictable outcome. The power curve for the F type is very linear so you can just compare the 0-60 and quarter mile times for the TT and the C63. For straight line acceleration the only f type choice is the V8. Also, if this is what you care about why aren't you looking at the corvette?

That said, the F-type, even in the V6 variants, will handle way better than either of them at speed. It isn't even close.
That is why it is typically comped against the 911 or Cayman. The TT and C63 are just not in the same class.
 

Last edited by schraderade; Jul 16, 2014 at 12:43 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2014 | 02:08 PM
  #5  
omgomg's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 191
Likes: 50
From: Boston-ish
Default

The Mercedes has a 6.2 liter V8, and you are comparing a supercharged 3L V6 to it.

Not really sure what you were expecting, how, or why.
 
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2014 | 02:11 PM
  #6  
F-typical's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 179
From: Herefordshire, England
Default

Originally Posted by omgomg
The Mercedes has a 6.2 liter V8, and you are comparing a supercharged 3L V6 to it.

Not really sure what you were expecting, how, or why.
He eats billy goats and lives under a bridge?
 
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2014 | 02:42 PM
  #7  
buickfunnycar.com's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,924
Likes: 335
From: Monterey, CA
Default

Originally Posted by F-typical
He eats billy goats and lives under a bridge?
LOL...to each his own but when I test drove,I found the V6 a very solid and capable performer...and that was just the base car.
 
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2014 | 02:49 PM
  #8  
Mulmur's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,420
Likes: 265
From: Mulmur, Ontario, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by sn4p
Test drove two cars yesterday: Mercedes C63 AMG and Jaguar F-Type Coupe V6S.

The merc was really awesome you could feel the torque, great engine sound and acceleration.

The F-Type however was a great disappointment (apart from the looks department). I put it in dynamic mode and floored it, but it felt no quicker or responsive than my Audi TT (2.0 turbo). The sound from the engine was also very smooth, I was expecting more of a growl.

Unfortunately they only had the V6S as a demo car so I couldn't try the V8. Unless it is a very different animal I'm probably going to look for another alternative. Also the price tag here in Mexico for a Type R with options is like $165,000 USD, very pricey, so it has to be exceptional for that kind of money. I just don't see it...

Just wanted to share this sad experience.
I've driven the big Merc and you cannot compare it to a V6 with a lot less horsepower.
My Ftype R (which I ended up buying) is a much better driving car than the Merc, in my opinion. The sound out of the R or even the V6 is awesome if you set the exhaust bypass switch.
Lawrence
 
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2014 | 03:20 PM
  #9  
sn4p's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 25
Likes: 3
Default

Originally Posted by digitalrurouni
I had the same experience but I have not written off the Jag yet cause I have not driven the V8. Also the Merc you mentioned has a big V8 with a lot more grunt that the Jag with a V6 supercharged or not. So you gotta give the Jag a break. Now there is no way you would be disappointed with the V8 that I am sure of.
Yeah I told the dealer I wasn't very pleased and he told me he would try to get the V8 for a test ride. The problem is that they only have one V8 and it has 0 miles so it might be a problem.
 
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2014 | 03:29 PM
  #10  
sn4p's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 25
Likes: 3
Default

Originally Posted by F-typical
He eats billy goats and lives under a bridge?
Yeah very funny at least I can read and if you could you'd probably understand that I wasn't expecting the V6 to stack up to the V8. I made the forum message so someone who has driven both the V6 and V8 could give me some input since I don't have the luxury to drive both myself.
 
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2014 | 03:42 PM
  #11  
Executive's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,688
Likes: 332
From: Empire State
Default

I am so tempted in saying go for the Merc, as I am a huge fan of them especially the AMGs. I own a Jaguar now and if it's a long term purchase, go for the Merc.

But to get back to the F type, make sure you drive the V8 as well, as it's not even comparable to the V6. I have driven them both and the V6 is quick, feels lighter, but the V8 is a monster. It will give you a blurry vision when you put your foot down from a stop, that's how brute it is.
 
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2014 | 05:40 PM
  #12  
sn4p's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 25
Likes: 3
Default

Originally Posted by Executive
I am so tempted in saying go for the Merc, as I am a huge fan of them especially the AMGs. I own a Jaguar now and if it's a long term purchase, go for the Merc.

But to get back to the F type, make sure you drive the V8 as well, as it's not even comparable to the V6. I have driven them both and the V6 is quick, feels lighter, but the V8 is a monster. It will give you a blurry vision when you put your foot down from a stop, that's how brute it is.
The Mercedes dealer will literally give me a new 2014 C63 AMG 507 edition for half the price of a new 2015 Jaguar F Type R. Even though the choice should be obvious the Jag is truly a piece of art and if it has the same punch as the merc I wouldn't be surprised if I end up buying it. Don't think they gonna sell too many of those Jags here so I'll try to convince them for a test drive.
 
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2014 | 05:46 PM
  #13  
Dremorg's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 996
Likes: 122
From: New York
Default

Originally Posted by Executive
I am so tempted in saying go for the Merc, as I am a huge fan of them especially the AMGs. I own a Jaguar now and if it's a long term purchase, go for the Merc.

But to get back to the F type, make sure you drive the V8 as well, as it's not even comparable to the V6. I have driven them both and the V6 is quick, feels lighter, but the V8 is a monster. It will give you a blurry vision when you put your foot down from a stop, that's how brute it is.
I agree with you. I also am a huge fan of AMG. I owned a C63 & I can tell you it's a beast. I enjoyed it all the way up until I got rid of it. Still miss it dearly. I've yet to own a Jag. This will be my first. I'm pretty sure I'll love it.
 
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2014 | 06:55 PM
  #14  
jag_guy_2020's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 242
Likes: 13
Default

you live in mejico? the ftype has gotta be better than the el camino you're probably driving?
 
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2014 | 07:08 PM
  #15  
vic55's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 272
Likes: 83
From: Orange County
Default

Originally Posted by sn4p
The Mercedes dealer will literally give me a new 2014 C63 AMG 507 edition for half the price of a new 2015 Jaguar F Type R. Even though the choice should be obvious the Jag is truly a piece of art and if it has the same punch as the merc I wouldn't be surprised if I end up buying it. Don't think they gonna sell too many of those Jags here so I'll try to convince them for a test drive.


Then you might as well take it because here the 507 is circa 80k and a well equipped R is 106k---- the difference being much more than half the R type pricing. These are US MSRP's btw and as others have said, its not apples vs. apples (the comparo you have made). If pricing is a factor then you have your decision and the 507 is an amazing beast with sound to boot. I'd have no issue getting that car.


I have the C63 Black Series which is one step up on the 507 (same engine though) and just got the R Coupe. I have zero complaints about the R coupe compared to BS track monster. Zero. Im only keeping the BS because its rather rare and I can enjoy it on unique outings and weekends. The R is the every day Sexy Warrior.
 

Last edited by vic55; Jul 16, 2014 at 07:15 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2014 | 07:11 PM
  #16  
Paul Light's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 10
Likes: 4
From: Frisco
Default

You need to experience a V8S.

What you are saying is similar to the McDonalds burger wasn't as good as my filet steak.

That being said, IMO the V6S is a fast, fluid driving machine.

Paul
 
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2014 | 07:52 PM
  #17  
WaltB's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 207
Likes: 98
From: Dallas, Texas
Default

It's a very different animal. You need to find one and drive it.

"Unfortunately they only had the V6S as a demo car so I couldn't try the V8. Unless it is a very different animal I'm probably going to look for another alternative"
 

Last edited by WaltB; Jul 16, 2014 at 07:54 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2014 | 08:18 PM
  #18  
enderle's Avatar
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,852
Likes: 703
From: Bend, OR
Default V8

I have a V8S and have driven the R and both of the 6s. Of the cars the V8S is actually more of a beast, the coupe is far more refined and actually doesn't feel as fast (it is much quieter). I'm sure it is faster but sound and wind noise do make the convertible feel faster and is far less refined, kind of a handful actually but a ton of fun. But if you are looking for noise and straight line performance the V8 is scary fast, the R hooks up better but the S will scare the neighbors two blocks over it makes impressive sounds.
 
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2014 | 12:40 AM
  #19  
sn4p's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 25
Likes: 3
Default

Originally Posted by vic55
Then you might as well take it because here the 507 is circa 80k and a well equipped R is 106k---- the difference being much more than half the R type pricing. These are US MSRP's btw and as others have said, its not apples vs. apples (the comparo you have made). If pricing is a factor then you have your decision and the 507 is an amazing beast with sound to boot. I'd have no issue getting that car.
It's probably because Mercedes have their prices in pesos and Jaguar in USD and on top of that some high import taxes. My friend bought a Carrera 4S and it ended up costing 168k. You probably get a Turbo S for that price in the US. The more I think of it I'll probably go for the AMG considering how much I'd lose once I decide to sell the Jag. Even though the Jag is hot I can stuff 2 hot chicks in the backseat on the merc, so it kind of makes up for it.

Originally Posted by vic55
I have the C63 Black Series which is one step up on the 507 (same engine though) and just got the R Coupe. I have zero complaints about the R coupe compared to BS track monster. Zero. Im only keeping the BS because its rather rare and I can enjoy it on unique outings and weekends. The R is the every day Sexy Warrior.
Sounds like we have the same taste in cars. Unfortunately they don't sell the BS down here so I have to settle for the 507, but with some carbon fiber add-ons it could get pretty close.
 
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2014 | 08:50 AM
  #20  
MarcusXFR's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 180
Likes: 56
From: Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by sn4p
The Mercedes dealer will literally give me a new 2014 C63 AMG 507 edition for half the price of a new 2015 Jaguar F Type R. Even though the choice should be obvious the Jag is truly a piece of art and if it has the same punch as the merc I wouldn't be surprised if I end up buying it. Don't think they gonna sell too many of those Jags here so I'll try to convince them for a test drive.
Sn4p,

I don't know if this will help you at all but here is a vid of the XKR-S which has the same 550hp V8 engine as the R coupe running against a C63 AMG w/Performance Pkg (487hp). Keep in mind that the R coupe is probably a car or two quicker than the XKR-S.

 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:24 AM.