5.0 Supercharger elec. bypass controll and MAP
#1
5.0 Supercharger elec. bypass controll and MAP
Hi
does anybody have types, datasheets, wiring diagrams (also connector pin information) and vacuum diagram for the "new" type 5.0L supercharger available? This supercharger has electrical bypass as seen in the attached photo
background; I was not paying too much attention (as usual ) and got newer than expected version, might be able to figure out something for the control ...
thanks in advance
Antti
does anybody have types, datasheets, wiring diagrams (also connector pin information) and vacuum diagram for the "new" type 5.0L supercharger available? This supercharger has electrical bypass as seen in the attached photo
background; I was not paying too much attention (as usual ) and got newer than expected version, might be able to figure out something for the control ...
thanks in advance
Antti
#3
#4
indeed i am planning to put the charger in the x300 xjr. like done in Australia already some years ago.
still in beginning of the planning / part sourcing phase, progress speed depends heavily from the wife-work-house renovation trinity....
for the bypass control : most likely the control is PWM controlled stepper, inputs from ECU. Best case scenario is that I can remove the stepper and convert it to conventional vacuum control or make / find some electrical vacuum measurement sensor that can then be used as input for stepper
or then i need to invest in MS which has boost control function via pwm control already that could be adapted for the bypass, IIRC.
still in beginning of the planning / part sourcing phase, progress speed depends heavily from the wife-work-house renovation trinity....
for the bypass control : most likely the control is PWM controlled stepper, inputs from ECU. Best case scenario is that I can remove the stepper and convert it to conventional vacuum control or make / find some electrical vacuum measurement sensor that can then be used as input for stepper
or then i need to invest in MS which has boost control function via pwm control already that could be adapted for the bypass, IIRC.
The following users liked this post:
ronbros (11-11-2016)