Eurotek claims fastest XKR 11.68 1/4 mile
#1
Eurotek claims fastest XKR 11.68 1/4 mile
eurotek claims:
A Tested 2003 XKR Coupe revealed the following Results
0-60Mph 4.1 seconds
0-100 Mph 10.23 seconds
¼ mile 11.68 with a trap speed 136 MPH
Top Speed 183 MPH
Rear Brake Horsepower at the Wheels 479bhp and 458lbs
Measured at the Flywheel 535hp/ 558ftbs
see here:http://www.eurotekdesigns.com/assets...guarXKCLUB.pdf
Has anyone any more info on this or is it completely bull?
A Tested 2003 XKR Coupe revealed the following Results
0-60Mph 4.1 seconds
0-100 Mph 10.23 seconds
¼ mile 11.68 with a trap speed 136 MPH
Top Speed 183 MPH
Rear Brake Horsepower at the Wheels 479bhp and 458lbs
Measured at the Flywheel 535hp/ 558ftbs
see here:http://www.eurotekdesigns.com/assets...guarXKCLUB.pdf
Has anyone any more info on this or is it completely bull?
The following users liked this post:
User 070620 (01-31-2013)
#2
There is something wrong with those numbers. 0-60 takes 4.1sec, so could be major traction problems. 11.6 car should make this in 3.5sec. Then another thing: 0-100 takes 10.23sec and after 1.45sec the speed is 136mph - WOW that's a huge acceleration, like 300HP NOS shot would come from 100mph. 535BHP can not do 136mph end speed in our cars.
I would like to know from where are those stats. RWP/BHP difference is just 10.5% . Are they using manual transmission or wrong calculation also with these numbers?
I would like to know from where are those stats. RWP/BHP difference is just 10.5% . Are they using manual transmission or wrong calculation also with these numbers?
eurotek claims:
A Tested 2003 XKR Coupe revealed the following Results
0-60Mph 4.1 seconds
0-100 Mph 10.23 seconds
¼ mile 11.68 with a trap speed 136 MPH
Top Speed 183 MPH
Rear Brake Horsepower at the Wheels 479bhp and 458lbs
Measured at the Flywheel 535hp/ 558ftbs
see here:http://www.eurotekdesigns.com/assets...guarXKCLUB.pdf
Has anyone any more info on this or is it completely bull?
A Tested 2003 XKR Coupe revealed the following Results
0-60Mph 4.1 seconds
0-100 Mph 10.23 seconds
¼ mile 11.68 with a trap speed 136 MPH
Top Speed 183 MPH
Rear Brake Horsepower at the Wheels 479bhp and 458lbs
Measured at the Flywheel 535hp/ 558ftbs
see here:http://www.eurotekdesigns.com/assets...guarXKCLUB.pdf
Has anyone any more info on this or is it completely bull?
Last edited by XJR-99; 09-15-2012 at 11:16 AM.
#3
#4
The following users liked this post:
User 070620 (08-09-2013)
#5
Yes, this guy is pure BS. My car with approx 470-475 flywheel HP runs a 0-100 in approx 10.5 and I am certain it is no faster than a 12.7 or so in the 1/4.
So it is obvious that these numbers do not add up at all.
If you look at the numbers HE PROVIDED, at the end of 10.23 seconds the car can do 100, then only 1.45 seconds later it can be doing 136 mph.
Yes, he is saying it accelerates from 100 to 136 mph in just 1.45 seconds.
What a bafoon.
So it is obvious that these numbers do not add up at all.
If you look at the numbers HE PROVIDED, at the end of 10.23 seconds the car can do 100, then only 1.45 seconds later it can be doing 136 mph.
Yes, he is saying it accelerates from 100 to 136 mph in just 1.45 seconds.
What a bafoon.
#6
Utter bullshit. Even if the ET is to be believed, you would need over 750 hp for that kind of trap speed but he claims only 535 hp.
And since it's not launching well from the 0-60 time, therefore he can't be getting that ET since ET is all about the launch.
So much wrong in those numbers. Just this line make you go wtf:
Rear Brake Horsepower at the Wheels 479bhp and 458lbs - it's one big contradiction.
Epic fail.
And since it's not launching well from the 0-60 time, therefore he can't be getting that ET since ET is all about the launch.
So much wrong in those numbers. Just this line make you go wtf:
Rear Brake Horsepower at the Wheels 479bhp and 458lbs - it's one big contradiction.
Epic fail.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)