Jaguar Engines & transmissions Discuss performance / modifications / upgrades etc here..

Oops! 87 Octane

Old May 9, 2013 | 11:51 PM
  #1  
SableCat's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 205
Likes: 36
From: Southern California
Default Oops! 87 Octane

I just returned home from a 10 day trip towing my travel trailer/caravan. My 2010 Ford F-150 V8 runs on 87 Octane. Well, the next day I got the big kitty out of the garage and took it out for a little run up a local canyon. But first I needed gas.

After many fill-ups on the truck, after I put the card in the slot I punched the 87 octane button on the pump. It was not until I was leaving the station that I realized what I had done. Nearly a full tank of 87 octane gas.

The result? I noticed nothing different. Apparently the computer/spark timing/variable cam timing setup prevented any pinging. I also noticed no loss of performance. Hmmmm.

What I have done since is to fill up with premium as soon as I get down 1/4 tank. Better safe than sorry.

Tom
 
Reply
Old May 10, 2013 | 06:42 AM
  #2  
petthesweaty's Avatar
Member
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 92
Likes: 21
From: plantersville, tx
Default

The only difference I noticed when I did the same thing is about a 2mpg drop in fuel mileage.
 
Reply
Old May 10, 2013 | 09:28 AM
  #3  
Mikey's Avatar
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 11,057
Likes: 2,271
From: Perth Ontario Canada
Default

Many owners have deliberately or inadvertently fueled their vehicles with low(er) octane gas. Most report no difference at all or a slight reduction in mileage.
 
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2013 | 11:01 AM
  #4  
Rey's Avatar
Rey
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 449
Likes: 144
From: Salem, OR
Default

I run 87 octane exclusively in my '07 XK, and have consistently experienced better fuel economy when comparing back-to-back 87 octane vs. 91 octane.

I have had the same experience in an '05 Z06 Corvette; and an '07 BMW Z4.

My understanding is that 87 octane has more energy btu than 91. However, I add the caveat that if detonation occurs with 87 then ignition will be retarded and one will lose all the benefits of lower octane.
 
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2013 | 11:06 AM
  #5  
Rey's Avatar
Rey
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 449
Likes: 144
From: Salem, OR
Default

I run 87 octane exclusively in my '07 XK, and have consistently experienced better fuel economy when comparing back-to-back 87 octane vs. 91 octane.

I have had the same experience in an '05 Z06 Corvette; and an '07 BMW Z4.

My understanding is that 87 octane has more energy btu than 91. However, I add the caveat that if detonation occurs with 87 then ignition will be retarded and one will lose all the benefits of lower octane.
 
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2013 | 11:19 AM
  #6  
Graham Royls's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 215
Likes: 28
From: Arlinton Texas
Default Always 87

Have run 87 in my 2001 XJR for 8 years with no problems . Since I have not gone o higher octane I cannot attest to improved MPG.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jagtoes
XK / XKR ( X150 )
100
Apr 22, 2016 07:37 AM
jagtoes
XK / XKR ( X150 )
12
Oct 14, 2015 06:15 PM
thechaosmachine
F-Type ( X152 )
18
Sep 23, 2015 10:03 PM
Doovoe
New Member Area - Intro a MUST
8
Sep 8, 2015 05:42 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:51 PM.