MKI / MKII S type 240 340 & Daimler 1955 - 1967

1966 S-Type 3.8 MOD hello!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 9, 2018 | 06:49 AM
  #1  
wearlej's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Banned
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 240
Likes: 19
From: Londinium
Default 1966 S-Type 3.8 MOD hello!

Thought I should say a quick hello! I've been posting in the modern S-Type forums for a while but I have only recently picked up a classic S-Type. She is a bit rough and needs a fair bit of work but is on the road and usable.

The underside welding has all been done, but there is a fair bit of repair work needed on the wings and doors. Largely as a result of previous repairs that have not held up well.

1966 S-Type 3.8 MOD hello!-k97yib9.jpg

The interior is not bad, just very tired and neglected:

1966 S-Type 3.8 MOD hello!-ts4fbgs.jpg

Anyway, very glad to be here!
 
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2018 | 10:16 AM
  #2  
Fraser Mitchell's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 9,547
Likes: 2,546
From: Crewe, England
Default

Apart from the rear suspension, most mechanical parts are common with the Mark 2. Rust is usually the biggest problem with these cars. The interior doesn't look all that bad, but there is an awful lot to restore ! I did a Mark 2 and it took me 7 years.
 
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2018 | 01:19 PM
  #3  
TilleyJon's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 1,656
Likes: 438
From: Bath UK
Default

Hi Wearlej and wellcome aboard, it doesn't look too bad generally, the problem is that unless there has been a full bare metal respray you will never fully stop the repairs failing in time.

This applies to the repairs to the welding also, great care must be taken to cut out the rust traps, and seal them fully otherwise it will come back in time, it's hard enough to keep it at bay with bare metal rebuild, as the monocoque chassis's have built in rust traps !!

The interior looks like it would clean up well, some attention obviously needed to some of the wood, but with the pictures it looks in fair condition.
 
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2018 | 06:04 PM
  #4  
wearlej's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Banned
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 240
Likes: 19
From: Londinium
Default

Thanks

At this stage I'm going to have to concentrate on just tidying her up as much as possible and fixing what small faults I can. I don't have access to a garage myself, and on top of that my bodywork skills are basically non existent!

I'm OK on the mechanical side but Ive never got my head around the bodywork.

I've got four spare doors for her that are in pretty good shape physically but need to be painted to match.
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2018 | 04:45 PM
  #5  
Jose's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,137
Likes: 2,658
From: Florida
Default

I think it looks very nice as is, good patina. The interior looks great. Series 2 XJ-6 wing mirrors.
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2018 | 07:33 PM
  #6  
Robman25's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 817
Likes: 193
From: Auckland
Default

Not sure about the S11 wing mirror as my ‘66 has the same style and I have had the car for 34 years.
 
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2018 | 05:37 AM
  #7  
wearlej's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Banned
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 240
Likes: 19
From: Londinium
Default

Aye, thanks all. I'm reasonably content with her the way she is, I do want to tidy her up a bit but I certainly have no plans to get her to concours condition. I plan to drive her a lot. I've already done about 600 miles in her. I've had a major service done and swapped from positive to negative earth with an alternator.

Apart from sorting out the mechanical work on her it will mainly be refitting missing parts (of which there appears to be lots!) and just undoing years of neglect. The main body issues are things like this:

1966 S-Type 3.8 MOD hello!-dnqrzsq.jpg

It can be seen where previously a repair section has been welded in, but either not very well, or so long ago it has deteriorated. The other wing is much the same.

As can be seen I have no qualms about driving her in the wet!
 
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2018 | 11:40 AM
  #8  
TilleyJon's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 1,656
Likes: 438
From: Bath UK
Default

It looks like the wing repair was not great ! Have a look inside the wing to see if they just welded it over the top or did they cut it and butt weld properly. Looks like it was not cleaned properly or not treated after the repair.

There are some water traps in front of the A post which should be dealt with, but looks like they were not. The wings will need quite a bit of work to stop the rust reoccurring more and more rapidly.
 
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2018 | 05:50 PM
  #9  
Jose's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,137
Likes: 2,658
From: Florida
Default

I'm not sure about the mirrors either, but those types of squared elongated mirrors were not used by Jaguar in 1966. They came with the Lucas "Motorcycle" Wing mirrors.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
66s-type
MKI / MKII S type 240 340 & Daimler
25
Sep 17, 2016 03:57 AM
66s-type
New Member Area - Intro a MUST
14
Sep 14, 2016 12:15 AM
SCwriter
New Member Area - Intro a MUST
9
Jan 26, 2016 11:50 AM
azjag4pt2
New Member Area - Intro a MUST
10
Aug 6, 2014 09:11 PM
Fidanza
PRIVATE For Sale / Trade or Buy Classifieds
3
Oct 21, 2008 09:45 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:12 PM.