MKI / MKII S type 240 340 & Daimler 1955 - 1967

Question on AJ6/16 Engine Fitment

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 14, 2022 | 05:33 PM
  #1  
kellen302's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Portland, Oregon
Default Question on AJ6/16 Engine Fitment

I have seen a number of threads on AJ6 or AJ16 Supercharged swaps into Series XJ6 or XJS chassis, and a couple rumors of AJ6 in MKII's, but has anyone put an AJ16 SC into a MKI/II/3.8S/420? There is a company in the UK making standalone ECU/harness arrangements so I am not concerned on the wiring. But I would like to know if anyone has had success physically fitting everything in the tighter engine bay of these cars without too much sheetmetal work?

I'm looking at finding myself a 420 so I'd like to explore some of my future options if I find the XK 4.2 a bit lacking. I previously had a SIII XJ6 which was fun, but a bit of a dog, likely due to the rather ill Borg Warner automatic.

Thanks!
 
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2022 | 05:40 PM
  #2  
Jagboi64's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,250
Likes: 3,509
From: Calgary, Canada
Default

Yes, a fellow in Victoria, BC has done it to a Mark 2. From what I understand, the front is basically a Mark 2 veneer of the outer sheet metal on the XJR subframe and inner frame. It's much more than just an engine swap, it required major fabrication.



 
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2022 | 05:48 PM
  #3  
Peter3442's Avatar
Veteran Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,284
Likes: 1,457
From: Oxford, UK
Default

https://web.archive.org/web/20161015...oy.com/Mk1.htm
is a good write-up of a NA AJ6 in a Mk1
 
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2022 | 09:09 PM
  #4  
kellen302's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Portland, Oregon
Default

Excellent information from everyone, looks like a bit more cutting than I am looking to do, I'll probably explore the EFI and maybe low boost turbo options for the XK if I need more power.
 
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2022 | 02:59 AM
  #5  
Peter3442's Avatar
Veteran Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,284
Likes: 1,457
From: Oxford, UK
Default

Mechanically driven centrifugal superchargers like Rotrex and Vortech are the most space efficient. They have other attractions in nicely compensating the fall in volumetric efficiency of the engine at high revs. Given the funds, it's the option I'd follow.
 
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2022 | 07:16 AM
  #6  
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 5,546
Likes: 1,493
From: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
Default

That AJ6 is a tough & durable engine,
 
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2022 | 11:48 AM
  #7  
Peter3442's Avatar
Veteran Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,284
Likes: 1,457
From: Oxford, UK
Default

Originally Posted by Glyn M Ruck
That AJ6 is a tough & durable engine,
I've read some internet claims that, with good flow work on the cylinder head and porting, it's possible to obtain 300 hp from them without supercharging or too much loss of low speed flexibility.
 
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2022 | 12:06 PM
  #8  
kellen302's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Portland, Oregon
Default

Certainly have some options then, I would lean towards a turbo on the XK if I did forced induction to leave accessory drive room for AC. Our summers certainly aren't getting any cooler. 30 days over 90 this year...
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jayd2
XJ6 & XJ12 Series I, II & III
38
Feb 18, 2024 02:36 PM
Peter Henauw
XJ6 & XJ12 Series I, II & III
7
Oct 29, 2019 06:49 PM
Tyreed
XJ XJ6 / XJR6 ( X300 )
7
Aug 8, 2016 08:36 AM
jagyankee
XJ6 & XJ12 Series I, II & III
3
Oct 18, 2013 06:09 PM
wayne1991
XJ6 & XJ12 Series I, II & III
8
May 20, 2009 12:39 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:02 AM.