MKI / MKII S type 240 340 & Daimler 1955 - 1967

Wheel alignment suggestions.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-16-2019, 06:22 AM
domain58's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Noosaville Queensland
Posts: 103
Received 22 Likes on 19 Posts
Default Wheel alignment suggestions.

Dear forum members I wish to say how much I enjoy reading the posts and photos, some of the restoration projects are mind blowing.
Here is my question I have fitted new top and bottom ball joints to the front suspension and also fitted an EZ electric power steering unit (what an improvement in the drive ability of the car) any suggestions as to wheel alignment settings or do I stick with the standard factory settings. The car is a 1964 V8 saloon driven on club outings at just below highway speeds.
Suggestions appreciated.
David B.in Australia.
 
  #2  
Old 03-16-2019, 10:51 AM
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 5,117
Received 1,348 Likes on 1,050 Posts
Default

I suggest you watch TJ's thread as it progresses to Ackerman steering and angles. Standard Jag set up is inherently zero castor or camber & 1/8th inch toe in. Strange by modern standards where negative camber (up to 3 deg) and high castor angles are the norm (+- 10 deg).

Your problem with R&P steering conversion is likely to be not maintaining Ackerman angles & suffering front tyre slip & scuff.

You might have to experiment with slight toe out to even out front tyre wear with R&P.
 
  #3  
Old 03-16-2019, 05:57 PM
domain58's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Noosaville Queensland
Posts: 103
Received 22 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Hi Glen,
Thanks for your quick reply.
My power steering is mounted up under the dash panel and drives the normal steering box so the steering is as it came from the factory.
My shop manual lists camber at 3/4 deg. +or- 1/4 deg pos. castor 0 deg + or - 1/4 deg toe in 1/8 ".
Would you stick with the factory settings or run a bit less camber say 0 deg castor a bit positive and 0 toe?
Your thoughts would be appreciated.
Regards,
David B.
 
  #4  
Old 03-16-2019, 06:48 PM
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 5,117
Received 1,348 Likes on 1,050 Posts
Default

Sorry ~ misunderstood. Thought you had fitted electric rack & pinion.

Just stick to factory standard. Without major modification they can't really be improved. The small range of tolerances they show are not going to make any difference to anything. Keeping tyre pressures right will make more difference.

The Mk2/S Type front suspension & steering was designed before the days of anti dive considerations & high speed straight line stability with strong self centering.
 
The following users liked this post:
domain58 (03-16-2019)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jrwb
XJ40 ( XJ81 )
8
10-30-2011 06:38 AM
Sparty
X-Type ( X400 )
7
11-15-2010 04:38 PM
jagxkrtoofast
XK8 / XKR ( X100 )
4
05-10-2010 08:42 AM
randylindberg
XJ6 & XJ12 Series I, II & III
7
05-31-2007 04:03 PM
Soon2bMD
X-Type ( X400 )
13
02-16-2007 12:59 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: Wheel alignment suggestions.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:23 AM.