S-Type / S type R Supercharged V8 ( X200 ) 1999 - 2008 2001 - 2009
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2008 S-type rear brake rotors

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 10-23-2017, 01:27 PM
Dudes08's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Sunny Central Florida
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default 2008 S-type rear brake rotors

I'm have a hard time finding rear brake rotors for my 08 s-type. (except for Jag dealer who wants $438 for the pair. The issue is my car came with the smaller diameter 305mm discs. I find some listed on ebay and other sites but they all say they are for the front. Please let me know if anyone knows if the front and rear are the same style and size rotors.
 
  #2  
Old 10-23-2017, 01:52 PM
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Newport Beach, California
Posts: 5,574
Received 2,579 Likes on 1,784 Posts
Default

The rear brake discs are 288mm in diameter and 20mm thick on a 2008 S-Type normally aspirated car.
 
  #3  
Old 10-23-2017, 01:57 PM
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: PHX some of the time
Posts: 116,746
Received 6,253 Likes on 5,453 Posts
  #4  
Old 10-23-2017, 01:58 PM
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: PHX some of the time
Posts: 116,746
Received 6,253 Likes on 5,453 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NBCat
The rear brake discs are 288mm in diameter and 20mm thick on a 2008 S-Type normally aspirated car.
300 or 326 I think.
 
  #5  
Old 10-23-2017, 02:30 PM
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Newport Beach, California
Posts: 5,574
Received 2,579 Likes on 1,784 Posts
Default

From the Workshop Manual 2002.5 - 2008 S-Type (in bold below)

Brake Lining and Disc Specifications
Item Specification
Brake pad material nominal thickness - front - Vehicles with 2.5L, 2.7L Diesel, 3.0L or 4.2L engine 10.75 mm (0.42 in)
Brake pad material minimum thickness - front - Vehicles with 2.5L, 2.7L Diesel, 3.0L or 4.2L engine 2 mm (0.08 in)
Brake pad material nominal thickness - front - Vehicles with high performance brakes 10.30 mm (0.41 in)
Brake pad material minimum thickness - front - Vehicles with high performance brakes 2 mm (0.08 in)
Brake pad material nominal thickness - rear - Vehicles with 2.5L, 2.7L Diesel, 3.0L or 4.2L engine 10.95 mm (0.43 in)
Brake pad material minimum thickness - rear - Vehicles with 2.5L, 2.7L Diesel, 3.0L or 4.2L engine 2 mm (0.08 in)
Brake pad material nominal thickness - rear - Vehicles with high performance brakes 8.90 mm (0.35 in)
Brake pad material minimum thickness - rear - Vehicles with high performance brakes 2 mm (0.08 in)
Brake pad material nominal thickness - parking brake pads - Vehicles with high performance brakes 5.50 mm (0.21 in)
Brake pad material minimum thickness - parking brake pads - Vehicles with high performance brakes 1 mm (0.04 in)
Front brake disc diameter - Vehicles with 2.5L, 2.7L Diesel, 3.0L engine fitted with standard suspension
components and vehicles with 4.2L engine USA and Canada
300 mm (12 in)
Front brake disc diameter - Vehicles with 2.5L, 2.7L Diesel, 3.0L, 4.2L engine fitted with sport suspension
components and vehicles with 4.2L engine Rest of world
320 mm (12.8 in)
Front brake disc diameter - Vehicles with high performance brakes 365 mm (14.6 in)
New front Brake disc nominal thickness - Vehicles with 2.5L, 2.7L Diesel, 3.0L or 4.2L engine 30 mm (1.2 in)
New front brake disc nominal thickness - Vehicles with high performance brakes 32 mm (1.28 in)
Worn brake disc discard thickness - Vehicles with 2.5L, 2.7L Diesel, 3.0L engine fitted with standard suspension
components and vehicles with 4.2L engine USA and Canada
28 mm (1.10 in)
Worn brake disc discard thickness - Vehicles with 2.5L, 2.7L Diesel, 3.0L, 4.2L engine fitted with sport
suspension components and vehicles with 4.2L engine Rest of world
28.4 mm (1.12 in)
Worn front brake disc discard thickness - Vehicles with high performance brakes 30 mm (1.2 in)
Rear brake disc diameter - Vehicles with 2.5L, 2.7L Diesel, 3.0L or 4.2L engine 288 mm (11.52 in)
Rear brake disc diameter - Vehicles with high performance brakes 330 mm (13.2 in)
New rear brake disc nominal thickness - Vehicles with 2.5L, 2.7L Diesel, 3.0L or 4.2L engine 20 mm (0.8 in)
New rear brake disc nominal thickness - Vehicles with high performance brakes 15 mm (0.6 in)
Worn rear brake disc minimum thickness - Vehicles with 2.5L, 2.7L Diesel, 3.0L or 4.2L engine 18.50 mm (0.73 in)
Worn rear brake disc minimum thickness - Vehicles with high performance brakes 13 mm (0.52 in)
Maximum front and rear brake disc runout (installed) - Vehicles with 2.5L, 2.7L Diesel, 3.0L or 4.2L engine 0.076 mm ( 0.003 in)
Maximum front brake disc runout (installed) - Vehicles with high performance brakes 0.076 mm ( 0.003 in)
Maximum rear brake disc runout (installed) - Vehicles with high performance brakes 0.076 mm ( 0.003 in)
Maximum front hub face runout (installed) 0.015 mm ( 0.006 in)
Maximum rear hub face runout (installed) 0.030 mm ( 0.012 in)
Front brake caliper piston diameter - twin piston - Vehicles with 2.5L, 2.7L Diesel, 3.0L or 4.2L engine 38 mm (1.52 in) and 45
mm (1.8 in)
Rear brake caliper piston diameter - Vehicles with 2.5L, 2.7L Diesel, 3.0L or 4.2L engine 43 mm (1.72 in)
Front brake caliper piston diameter - twin piston - Vehicles with high performance brakes 38 mm (1.52 in) and 44
mm (1.8 in)
Rear brake caliper piston diameter - twin piston - Vehicles with high performance brakes 28 mm (1.12 in) and 30
mm (1.2 in)
 
  #6  
Old 10-23-2017, 02:39 PM
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: PHX some of the time
Posts: 116,746
Received 6,253 Likes on 5,453 Posts
Default

From EPC

 
  #7  
Old 10-23-2017, 02:53 PM
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Newport Beach, California
Posts: 5,574
Received 2,579 Likes on 1,784 Posts
Default

Yes, I can see that in JPEC. So there appears to be a discrepancy. Very interesting.

Here is the page from the Workshop Manual from 2011-05-11...
 
Attached Files
File Type: pdf
s-type_brake_specification.pdf (96.0 KB, 125 views)
  #8  
Old 10-23-2017, 07:50 PM
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: PHX some of the time
Posts: 116,746
Received 6,253 Likes on 5,453 Posts
Default

It seems they changed the spec very late and now the 300mm discs are like hens teeth and shockingly expensive.
 
The following users liked this post:
NBCat (10-23-2017)
  #9  
Old 10-23-2017, 09:36 PM
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Newport Beach, California
Posts: 5,574
Received 2,579 Likes on 1,784 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Norri
It seems they changed the spec very late and now the 300mm discs are like hens teeth and shockingly expensive.
Thank you for posting the page from JPEC. I suppose anyone with a later car will need to measure the diameter of their rear brake discs to ensure the correct discs and pads can be located.
 
  #10  
Old 10-24-2017, 12:43 AM
JagV8's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Yorkshire, England
Posts: 26,645
Received 4,484 Likes on 3,902 Posts
Default

By now the cars may not have the OE ones i.e. may have had them replaced some time ago. Quite possibly by either size, as anyone changing the discs could have stumbled across either size as being what to buy.

(Different car, but there were two sizes stated by Jaguar for the rears of my STR. I went with the larger size, which was in JTIS.)
 
  #11  
Old 10-24-2017, 03:14 AM
neilr's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 525
Received 274 Likes on 188 Posts
Default

So:

VIN TO N52047 XR827087 288 mm
VIN N52048 -> C2C25338 300 mm

https://www.ebay.com/itm/JAGUAR-S-TY...sAAOSwgtJXT5-g

 
  #12  
Old 10-24-2017, 07:22 AM
Dudes08's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Sunny Central Florida
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Thanks for all the great info. I am the second owner and know the first so the brakes have never been serviced. I finally found a dealer that would give me the part numbers for my car (based on the VIN) and found that mine are the "rate" 300 mm rear and, 305 mm front. They are $467 from my local dealer with 3-5 days delivery. I actually found one pair of rear discs, new, from a guy in California. Still expensive at $320 including shipping, but there are no more to be found. Fortunately, the front discs are available for a lot less. Thanks for you help
 
  #13  
Old 10-24-2017, 08:11 AM
neilr's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 525
Received 274 Likes on 188 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dudes08
...part numbers for my car (based on the VIN) and found that mine are the "rate" 300 mm rear and, 305 mm front.
Would the original Jaguar rears from the ebay link above not do? Even with shipping it is cheap

Are you sure about the front ones? Typically the last S-Types had the 326mm discs.

What are the part numbers you were quoted. It may help someone else in the future.
 

Last edited by neilr; 10-24-2017 at 08:13 AM.
  #14  
Old 10-24-2017, 11:50 AM
stevep10's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 389
Received 112 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Might be worth a shot
My 2002 S Type 4.0L V8 has 300mm front discs on it.
And 288mm on the rear.

Found a link to a UK seller that might be of help for you:

Jaguar S-Type Discs Parts - JustJagsUK.com
 
  #15  
Old 10-25-2017, 05:49 AM
Dudes08's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Sunny Central Florida
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

I have the ebay rotors on the way to me, should have them tomorrow.
I gave my vin number to a dealer and they gave me these part numbers:
Front rotors: C2C25335 - 305 mm
Rear rotors: C2C25338 300 mm
I haven't started on the front brakes as of today. Be assured I will measure the rotors before I purchase the new rotors.
 
  #16  
Old 10-25-2017, 06:14 AM
neilr's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 525
Received 274 Likes on 188 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dudes08
I have the ebay rotors on the way to me, should have them tomorrow.
I gave my vin number to a dealer and they gave me these part numbers:
Front rotors: C2C25335 - 305 mm
Rear rotors: C2C25338 300 mm
I haven't started on the front brakes as of today. Be assured I will measure the rotors before I purchase the new rotors.
I now notice that the 305mm front disc/rotors were not for the German market. I guess that is why they never appear on my parts comparators. I expect you are correct with your part numbers but a double check is always wise

Pattern part: https://www.ebay.com/itm/Jaguar-Pair...xZCH42&vxp=mtr

Original: https://www.ebay.com/itm/Jaguar-C2C2...VZNRzr&vxp=mtr
 
  #17  
Old 10-25-2017, 06:20 AM
neilr's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 525
Received 274 Likes on 188 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stevep10
Might be worth a shot
My 2002 S Type 4.0L V8 has 300mm front discs on it.
And 288mm on the rear.
That is correct for all the X200 models. Some models came with bigger front discs from X202 onwards (320, 326 and also these 305 mm ones).

Most rears were 288 mm but it seems that some also had these 300 mm ones
 
  #18  
Old 01-15-2018, 08:33 AM
jeffn's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Treasure Coast, FL
Posts: 564
Received 26 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

So, anyone know where an 07' 4.2 fits in this millieu for rear rotors? Fleabay calls for 326mm.
 
  #19  
Old 01-15-2018, 09:21 AM
Jon89's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 12,534
Received 4,275 Likes on 2,812 Posts
Default

Call your nearest Jaguar dealership parts department with your VIN and ask them to tell you what specific rotors you need. Get their part number, then you can begin your online search for a much better-priced equivalent....
 
The following users liked this post:
jeffn (01-15-2018)
  #20  
Old 01-15-2018, 07:37 PM
Catmobile's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Eureka, Ca.
Posts: 229
Received 46 Likes on 37 Posts
Default

I got pads and rotors for the rear on my car at the local NAPA store a couple of years ago and they were reasonably priced and good quality, don't get the cheapest ones though. My car is a 2003 with a 4.2 motor, but they should have them for yours too. Be sure to bring your old ones to see make sure that they match. The rotors were about the same price as having the old ones turned.
 

Last edited by Catmobile; 01-15-2018 at 07:44 PM.
The following users liked this post:
jeffn (01-15-2018)

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:19 PM.