4.0 V8... NA vs Supercharged
#21
Regarding the VVT I don't know if anyone as done it with the AJ28 but with an AJ33 or AJ34 you can delete the VVT by swapping the cam sprockets to the non-VVT version. The cams themselves are the same for VVT or non-VVT. A quick check of the parts catalog confirms the 4.0L N/A cams from the S-Type are the same as the 4.0L S/C cams from the X308 XJR.
Download a copy of the Jaguar Engine Repair Course Code 168, this details the basic changes from each model year on the engines.
And download the S-Type Model Introduction Launch document, it details a lot of design features of the engine in question.
Sounds like an interesting project, definitely NOT impossible and probably made quite easy if you are running a full aftermarket ECU and a manual transmission.
#22
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Perth Ontario Canada
Posts: 11,058
Received 2,266 Likes
on
1,845 Posts
In reading the two links, one owner dialed back the boost considerably and the other ultimately substituting a low compression engine each to avoid (at a minimum) detonation issues.
Neither project came anywhere near the desired 450HP and probably made not much more than a stock unit.
I'd get the car running in NA mode first before playing around with supercharging. A case of putting the car(t) before the horses, so to speak.
Neither project came anywhere near the desired 450HP and probably made not much more than a stock unit.
I'd get the car running in NA mode first before playing around with supercharging. A case of putting the car(t) before the horses, so to speak.
#23
It's going to take quite some experimentation, but sounds like he's up for it.
One thing is: after the SC something must be done to get the charge air temp down - the STR etc use intercoolers, for example, and an IAT2 to tell how well the temp has been kept down.
I'm guessing member avos may be interested and perhaps willing to comment.
One thing is: after the SC something must be done to get the charge air temp down - the STR etc use intercoolers, for example, and an IAT2 to tell how well the temp has been kept down.
I'm guessing member avos may be interested and perhaps willing to comment.
#24
Thanks for all the info chaps!
If it makes 350-400bhp in version 1, then 550 is definitely on the cards fo version 3...
First job is to get it running reliably and do some track day shakedowns...
After that we can start upping everything until it goes bang, and I will get a 2nd engine to build fully blueprinted and lightened for version 2...(probably aim for 9:1 ish for compression ration on the 2nd atempt.)
If it makes 350-400bhp in version 1, then 550 is definitely on the cards fo version 3...
First job is to get it running reliably and do some track day shakedowns...
After that we can start upping everything until it goes bang, and I will get a 2nd engine to build fully blueprinted and lightened for version 2...(probably aim for 9:1 ish for compression ration on the 2nd atempt.)
#25
#26
#27
#28
AJ26= 1 lobe for the CMPS
AJ27= 4 lobes for the CMPS
AJ28= 5 lobes for the CMPS
Exhaust cams are probably all compatible.
You could install the correct CMPS reluctor lobes to make them work????
I have never tried this.
bob gauff
#29
#30
Classic policy... Includes track days and agreed value of £8k - £260 per year.
It's tacked on to the fleet policy for all the other cars I have! Lol!
5 cars for my wife and I cost just under £1000 per year with free breakdown cover. Can't recommend herritige highly enough. I even get an account manager whom I email whenever I change cars (which is quite Often! There's so many cars I want to have owned and drive!)
It's tacked on to the fleet policy for all the other cars I have! Lol!
5 cars for my wife and I cost just under £1000 per year with free breakdown cover. Can't recommend herritige highly enough. I even get an account manager whom I email whenever I change cars (which is quite Often! There's so many cars I want to have owned and drive!)
#31
It's not truly a classic just because it has an old chassis (body). Your project would be a highly modified car which you would have to explain in detail (in effect you have to read the insurer's small print with their lawyers' eyes). I expect a huge hike in premium.
I think you'll also need some sort of official certification that it is road legal (maybe from VOSA?).
I think you won't need the latter if it's never for use on any UK road (e.g. track use only).
I think you'll also need some sort of official certification that it is road legal (maybe from VOSA?).
I think you won't need the latter if it's never for use on any UK road (e.g. track use only).
Last edited by JagV8; 09-21-2015 at 01:34 AM.
#32
It's not truly a classic just because it has an old chassis (body). Your project would be a highly modified car which you would have to explain in detail (in effect you have to read the insurer's small print with their lawyers' eyes). I expect a huge hike in premium.
I think you'll also need some sort of official certification that it is road legal (maybe from VOSA?).
I think you won't need the latter if it's never for use on any UK road (e.g. track use only).
I think you'll also need some sort of official certification that it is road legal (maybe from VOSA?).
I think you won't need the latter if it's never for use on any UK road (e.g. track use only).
It doesn't need a VOSA cert.
#33
Check with them? You mean you detailed that you'd be changing all the safety-related stuff (*) and putting in a far more powerful engine and they don't want any more money? Get it in writing!! (**)
Obviously, the car has to be roadworthy and if it were found not to be following an accident (I'm thinking worst case here) then you face bankruptcy and jail
I don't want to put you off, though. Quite the opposite - it's a great project but needs doing right. Quite likely you know all this but just wanted to make sure...
(*) er, you ARE doing that I sincerely hope!
(**) I do mean that - a conversation is not going to be binding
Obviously, the car has to be roadworthy and if it were found not to be following an accident (I'm thinking worst case here) then you face bankruptcy and jail
I don't want to put you off, though. Quite the opposite - it's a great project but needs doing right. Quite likely you know all this but just wanted to make sure...
(*) er, you ARE doing that I sincerely hope!
(**) I do mean that - a conversation is not going to be binding
Last edited by JagV8; 09-21-2015 at 02:51 AM.
#34
Check with them? You mean you detailed that you'd be changing all the safety-related stuff (*) and putting in a far more powerful engine and they don't want any more money? Get it in writing!! (**)
Obviously, the car has to be roadworthy and if it were found not to be following an accident (I'm thinking worst case here) then you face bankruptcy and jail
I don't want to put you off, though. Quite the opposite - it's a great project but needs doing right. Quite likely you know all this but just wanted to make sure...
(*) er, you ARE doing that I sincerely hope!
(**) I do mean that - a conversation is not going to be binding
Obviously, the car has to be roadworthy and if it were found not to be following an accident (I'm thinking worst case here) then you face bankruptcy and jail
I don't want to put you off, though. Quite the opposite - it's a great project but needs doing right. Quite likely you know all this but just wanted to make sure...
(*) er, you ARE doing that I sincerely hope!
(**) I do mean that - a conversation is not going to be binding
don't worry its all in hand!
somewhat off topic...
so regarding Cams would i just need to change the inlet cams? i would prefer to delete the VVT for simplicity's sake... i did wonder about using the VVT open at low revs to improve torque and non VVT at the top end to improve power... (opposite to the NA car) - Honda did this on the new Civic Type R, the VTech now kick in under 4000rpm to improve low down torque with the new Turbo engine, totally the opposite to the old Honda K20 which wouldnt hit VTech until 5500rpm plus...
any help appreciated!
#35
#36
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: PHX some of the time
Posts: 117,716
Received 6,340 Likes
on
5,525 Posts
From the new member section post:
(Sorry I thought this was repeated in the other post I copied into this thread)
(Sorry I thought this was repeated in the other post I copied into this thread)
i am often being called a fool or idiot, but i am trying to put a jaguar supercharged 4.0 V8 into my Lotus Excel...
its a work in progress, and i am now starting to strip, test and rebuilt/tidy up the engine...
i am new here, so thought i would post a hello and warning that i am clearly a little bit of a nut case
if anyone is interested in the project the headlines are:
circa 500bhp 2001 Supercharged Jag 4.0 V8 into 1987 Lotus Excel
bespoke FIA roll cage
toyota clutch and gearbox
emerald ecu (wasted spark configuration)
toyota W58 gearbox
toyota diff (3.9:1)
car built for track work (time attack/track days) but road legal (just)
target dry weight of 900kgs
target power to weight of 500bhp/tonne+
Here is the beast before the engine upset
Cheers!
Oz
its a work in progress, and i am now starting to strip, test and rebuilt/tidy up the engine...
i am new here, so thought i would post a hello and warning that i am clearly a little bit of a nut case
if anyone is interested in the project the headlines are:
circa 500bhp 2001 Supercharged Jag 4.0 V8 into 1987 Lotus Excel
bespoke FIA roll cage
toyota clutch and gearbox
emerald ecu (wasted spark configuration)
toyota W58 gearbox
toyota diff (3.9:1)
car built for track work (time attack/track days) but road legal (just)
target dry weight of 900kgs
target power to weight of 500bhp/tonne+
Here is the beast before the engine upset
Cheers!
Oz
#37
#38
Wow, what a great story! I really looking forward to learning how it goes. Please include as many pictures as you can. I'd really like to see the engine compartment, first with the old engine in place, then empty, then... :-)
================================================== ===========
Understeer is when you hit the wall with the front of the car
Oversteer is when you hit the wall with the rear of the car
Horsepower is how fast you hit the wall, and
Torque is how far you take the wall with you
================================================== ===========
Understeer is when you hit the wall with the front of the car
Oversteer is when you hit the wall with the rear of the car
Horsepower is how fast you hit the wall, and
Torque is how far you take the wall with you
#40
Wow, what a great story! I really looking forward to learning how it goes. Please include as many pictures as you can. I'd really like to see the engine compartment, first with the old engine in place, then empty, then... :-)
================================================== ===========
Understeer is when you hit the wall with the front of the car
Oversteer is when you hit the wall with the rear of the car
Horsepower is how fast you hit the wall, and
Torque is how far you take the wall with you
================================================== ===========
Understeer is when you hit the wall with the front of the car
Oversteer is when you hit the wall with the rear of the car
Horsepower is how fast you hit the wall, and
Torque is how far you take the wall with you
and the donor car i paid £1100 for and stripped for £1800 and kept the engine!