S-Type / S type R Supercharged V8 ( X200 ) 1999 - 2008 2001 - 2009
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Best Model Year S-type Supercharged (STR)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 13, 2012 | 08:54 AM
  #1  
Tijoe's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,558
Likes: 592
From: Kalispell, Montana
Default Best Model Year S-type Supercharged (STR)

I am looking into purchasing a 2004 STR and became curios as to what the forum members think is the best Model year S-type Supercharged?

In your opinions, what is the best model year STR and why?
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2012 | 09:08 AM
  #2  
GT42R's Avatar
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,295
Likes: 252
From: Canada
Default

In terms of styling, 2003-2004 were the best.

2005 they did the refresh, which added some chrome and incorporated less aggressive front and rear bumpers, but there were other improvements made. I think 2005 could be considered the best year of STR.

2006-2008 similar to 2005, but they got rid of the big brembo's, which to me is one of the major selling features of this car.

For me personally, 2003-2004 STR's are the best.

This thread is very good.
 

Last edited by GT42R; Jul 13, 2012 at 09:11 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2012 | 10:26 AM
  #3  
Sslah's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 34
Likes: 1
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

2005 of course. the newly updated exterior and address cooling issue of the 03-04 model. The last year of big BREMBO brake kit
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2012 | 10:59 AM
  #4  
Tijoe's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,558
Likes: 592
From: Kalispell, Montana
Default

The 2005 STR had an aluminum hood and Brembos? Does seem like the 2005 was the best of the rest.
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2012 | 12:49 PM
  #5  
JagV8's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 27,519
Likes: 4,910
From: Yorkshire, England
Default

Originally Posted by SSLAH
2005 of course. the newly updated exterior and address cooling issue of the 03-04 model. The last year of big BREMBO brake kit
Which cooling issue?
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2012 | 12:51 PM
  #6  
tbird6's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,899
Likes: 803
From: Home
Default

I have a 2005 STR but the differences were pretty small overall. In fact I have a real hard time seeing the body updates on the 2005 unless a 2003/3004 is right next to it.

For me removing the Brembo's was a big step backwards but Jaguar claimed that the 2006-2008 front brakes were better than the Brembo's!
.
.
.
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2012 | 04:20 PM
  #7  
93XJR-S's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 166
Likes: 9
From: Houston, TX
Default

03/04 (ok I'm biased and have an 03) differences are relatively subtle, only cooling issue I had was some hardening of the old rubber hoses hardly unique to this car. as much as a pain in the rear it has been on a few occasions it would take ALOT for me to part ways
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2012 | 05:46 PM
  #8  
MyBlackCat's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 552
Likes: 61
From: Texas
Default

Have any of you actually had an 06 sitting next to a Brembo caliper 03-05
The difference in size is almost nothing. The Brembos might be a little prettier but the Jag calipers are also huge, most people who see my Jag and don't no the difference always mention how big the front calipers are. The 06-08 brakes are much simpler and cheaper to work on and the price of pads is lower, no added parking brake caliper to worry about and the added cost of those little pads is crazy.
The 06-08 also had 20 more HP. Most guys will debate that as some Government wizardry but it was added none the less. VVT was also added which might be where the extra horses comes from.
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2012 | 07:12 PM
  #9  
rasputin's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 547
Likes: 101
From: USA USA
Default

I prefer the front fascia and the wheels of the 2005+ models, but like the rear bumper/tail lights of the 03/04's. Did the 2005's have the short shift issue? My 03 definitely does. 2006 and up are out of my price range.

I wouldn't necessarily hunt for a specific year, I think it all depends on whether or not the owner took care of the car and if for whatever reason the car is holding together really well. Best of luck and happy hunting.
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2012 | 07:33 PM
  #10  
Bad Cattitude's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 9,084
Likes: 569
From: Florida, USA
Default

Another biased review... I did my research here among other sources and chose my 05 for all the previous reasons mentioned. The Brembo brakes are a snap to service, no need to remove the calipers. The only concession would be the 08 models got 19" wheels.
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2012 | 10:32 PM
  #11  
Under Pressure's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 407
Likes: 70
From: Palm Beach Gardens, FL
Default

Originally Posted by MyBlackCat
The 06-08 also had 20 more HP. Most guys will debate that as some Government wizardry but it was added none the less. VVT was also added which might be where the extra horses comes from.
They had variable valve timing even in the 03 models (see links to road tests and car reviews below confirming same)....

2003 Jaguar S-type R - Road Test - Car Reviews - Car and Driver

2003 Jaguar S-Type R - Road Test & First Drive - Motor Trend

And in 2005, the SAE Certified Power went into effect which revised the way horsepower output was measured, and according to the below linked Wikipedia article, Cadillac's V8 jumped from 440hp to 469hp under the new test (with no changes to the engine)....

Horsepower - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I read on this forum that higher shift points were introduced in 05 or 06, but I have yet to see anything that confirms that. Under sport mode in the 03-04 models (just like 05-08 models), you already get a higher shiftpoint and using J gate you can take it well into the redline. Would anyone have anything that confirms any claims of Jaguar increasing the shift points?

As far as I can tell, the changes throughout its entire glorious reign were cosmetic only.
 

Last edited by Under Pressure; Jul 14, 2012 at 08:04 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2012 | 04:29 AM
  #12  
JagV8's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 27,519
Likes: 4,910
From: Yorkshire, England
Default

Read the reviews very carefully but armed with the knowledge the 4.2 NA did have VVT yet the STR did not. It really didn't. (Easy to check from JTIS and of course just look at where the wires are on the later STR and the blanks are on the 03-04 STR.) Motor Trend get it wrong

The HP was I believe not changed except due to the SAE change. Had they added 20HP Jaguar would have made it VERY clear and they do not or at least I've not found it even by searching their many brochures.

Some people want front fogs so don't want the 05+ as they were removed.

I think the shift points are in the calibration (software version) but would love true (factual) details, preferably from Jaguar.

Buy whichever you can afford and like - they're great
 

Last edited by JagV8; Jul 14, 2012 at 04:33 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2012 | 06:28 AM
  #13  
Under Pressure's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 407
Likes: 70
From: Palm Beach Gardens, FL
Default

Originally Posted by JagV8
Read the reviews very carefully but armed with the knowledge the 4.2 NA did have VVT yet the STR did not. It really didn't. (Easy to check from JTIS and of course just look at where the wires are on the later STR and the blanks are on the 03-04 STR.) Motor Trend get it wrong
I'm not so sure . I think Motor Trend is a very reputable publication, and I am pretty sure they get their specification information directly from the manufactorer. Besides, variable valve timing is ancient technology, even in 2003. For instance, back when I was younger and a bit more handsome (lol), I used to have a 1993 model year Honda Prelude VTEC. The "VTEC" is an acronym for "Variable valve timing and Lift electronic control."

And one can't help but to ask, why would Jaguar have the non-performance, naturally aspirated variants of the S-Type come with VVT, yet elect to forego having it in their performance oriented S Type R? Would seem odd if they want to compete with the E55, M5, and S6 to give their S Type R the handicap of an inability to change the timing of the intake/valves while under throttle.
 
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2012 | 08:04 AM
  #14  
JagV8's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 27,519
Likes: 4,910
From: Yorkshire, England
Default

I actually have one of the cars from the 03-04 years and it does not have VVT.

As I posted, it's easy to check.

Further, the Jaguar Technical Guide for the later years specifically details the changes which added VVT. You can get the various Guides from Jaguar e.g. from TOPIx (I did).

Just look in a few engine bays.
 
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2012 | 08:21 AM
  #15  
Norri's Avatar
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 121,050
Likes: 6,652
From: PHX some of the time
Default

Originally Posted by JagV8
Which cooling issue?
Maybe the 2005+ cars were just simply cooler?
 
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2012 | 08:26 AM
  #16  
Michael Star's Avatar
Veteran member
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,327
Likes: 251
From: Bowling Green, KY
Default

Wasn't it in 05 that they changed over to the double ribbed belt? I thought that actually created ~10hp due to less belt slippage
 
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2012 | 09:16 AM
  #17  
MyBlackCat's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 552
Likes: 61
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by Tijoe
I am looking into purchasing a 2004 STR and became curios as to what the forum members think is the best Model year S-type Supercharged?

In your opinions, what is the best model year STR and why?
Hey Tijoe, great thread, nice to have a friendly debate on here from time to time,with no right or wrong answers. All STR's are great.. get one FAST.

My question to you.. What happened to your project of throwing a new Camero engine in a 2000 S Type? You seemed to have thrown tons of money at it and I am hoping that you have not given up. Or is the STR part of the mix now?
You had mentioned suspension and brake upgrades to the old car but are you now going in a different direction.
Let us know.
 
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2012 | 09:55 AM
  #18  
JagV8's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 27,519
Likes: 4,910
From: Yorkshire, England
Default

Originally Posted by Michael Star
Wasn't it in 05 that they changed over to the double ribbed belt? I thought that actually created ~10hp due to less belt slippage
It was to fix a squeal on cold starts. It doesn't create 10HP (as if!!)
See JTB00045v4
 
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2012 | 09:58 AM
  #19  
Michael Star's Avatar
Veteran member
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,327
Likes: 251
From: Bowling Green, KY
Default

Originally Posted by JagV8
It was to fix a squeal on cold starts. It doesn't create 10HP (as if!!)
See JTB00045v4
Ya but I could have sworn I read somewhere that the increased grip actually created a bit more horsepower since it wasn't slipping anymore on the supercharger.
 
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2012 | 10:16 AM
  #20  
MyBlackCat's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 552
Likes: 61
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by JagV8
Read the reviews very carefully but armed with the knowledge the 4.2 NA did have VVT yet the STR did not. It really didn't. (Easy to check from JTIS and of course just look at where the wires are on the later STR and the blanks are on the 03-04 STR.) Motor Trend get it wrong

The HP was I believe not changed except due to the SAE change. Had they added 20HP Jaguar would have made it VERY clear and they do not or at least I've not found it even by searching their many brochures.

Some people want front fogs so don't want the 05+ as they were removed.

I think the shift points are in the calibration (software version) but would love true (factual) details, preferably from Jaguar.

Buy whichever you can afford and like - they're great
Hey John, great points. No VVT until 06 Those car magazines sure can make tons of mistakes and oversites.

I have my 06 factory brochure in hand as I write. No mention of 20 extra HP but they do say 400 HP on the page with the large words EXHILERATION midway through the brochure.

Also instead of saying VVT in the specs section at the back under Stype R they state Variable Cam Phasing. This is also mentioned under all the S type engines. Don't know if this is the same as VVT or some other feature.

Just more mud to muddle things LOL.

As as side note on the Exhileration page the photo of the STR is a indigo blue color and states that is a special order only car.

I have seen an 03-05 STR in my hood in this color and it is spectacular looking color.. maybe because it is so rare?? I keep an eye on that car and if I ever see a for sale sign I might go after it.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:54 AM.