K&N Results
#21
Vance580 boy do I think like you!! I almost got a Marauder for the reason of massive aftermarket mainly because of the Mustang and that 4.6L DOHC. Just wanted a better suspension and no stick rear end!
Good looking car. Surprised about the rust? The new cars are so much better protected these days!!!
.
.
.
Good looking car. Surprised about the rust? The new cars are so much better protected these days!!!
.
.
.
#22
A typeR with a good driver can typically do the 1/4 in 13.1 to 13.3 with a stock filter element in place. Most magazines quoted around 13.5.
Dropping .36 seconds and gaining 5.3 mph in the 1/4 takes a serious HP increase, far more than provided by an air filter change. The entire engineering team would have been put before a firing squad if they had made such a basic design mistake. There was something wrong with your 13.7 time.
Edit: A buddy of mine did some calculating with his desk top dyno for me. To achieve the quoted drop in 1/4 mile times would require an approx 50-60 horsepower increase.
Dropping .36 seconds and gaining 5.3 mph in the 1/4 takes a serious HP increase, far more than provided by an air filter change. The entire engineering team would have been put before a firing squad if they had made such a basic design mistake. There was something wrong with your 13.7 time.
Edit: A buddy of mine did some calculating with his desk top dyno for me. To achieve the quoted drop in 1/4 mile times would require an approx 50-60 horsepower increase.
#23
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Perth Ontario Canada
Posts: 11,058
Received 2,255 Likes
on
1,840 Posts
When challenged, the vendor usually launches into a pre-prepared conspiracy theory, something to do with the OEM and/or the evil government having a secret plot to screw the consumer.
Whether it's good for the economy or not, I suppose it depends on where the snake oil comes from.
#25
Yes, they are!
Good for the economy because it is better to have people employed at the air filter factories manufacturing and selling fantasies than it is to have them unemployed collecting government benefits. When they earn money they buy used Jaguars, then I get to charge them money to fix them. In turn, I can go out and buy things which employes even more workers who then go out and buy....well, you get the picture.
#26
Look, I'm not trying to sell anything. I can only give you the numbers from my six runs. three with stock and three with K&N. I understand you scepticizm. It's hard for me to believe also. I've had K&N filters in all my cars and have never had a result like this before. Ofcourse this is the only car I've owned with a supercharger. All of my reaction times were between .1 and .27 of a second.
#27
#29
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Perth Ontario Canada
Posts: 11,058
Received 2,255 Likes
on
1,840 Posts
#30
#31
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Perth Ontario Canada
Posts: 11,058
Received 2,255 Likes
on
1,840 Posts
Sorry, that makes no sense beyond abra-cadabra. Physics are physics. The weight of the car is X number of pounds. To make it go 1/4 mile in Y number of seconds requires Z horsepower. Any on-line calculator or desktop equivalent will show that the calculated times match up well with real life for a stock car.
To achieve the difference in times quoted represents a difference of 50-60 HP. The PO's best time was equal to what a typeR can do with a stock filter, in other words his K+N times were no better than stock.
That's why I wondered what was wrong with his stock filter time.
To achieve the difference in times quoted represents a difference of 50-60 HP. The PO's best time was equal to what a typeR can do with a stock filter, in other words his K+N times were no better than stock.
That's why I wondered what was wrong with his stock filter time.
#32
I'm not doubting the physics or saying that the K&N was extremely awesome but you can lower ET's with other things besides horsepower so saying he had to have 50-60hp to get the drop in ET's he did doesnt really have to be true. His tires could have been gripping better. The K&N being cleaner may have help his IAT's drop a little. My previous car you could drop 8/10's to almost a whole second with just a tune giving you about 15-20hp and a trans recal therefor causing the car to shift faster. His stock filter could have been dirty enough to throw off the ECU when putting in the K&N made it read correctly. Hell he could of also not had the airbox lid on all the way. Mine wasnt seated right for a week and when I reinstalled it and got it seated correctly I felt a little more power now that I was getting all clean air again. I just think there are alot more variables here then just hp. I do agree that there is no way a K&N is gonna give you 50-60hp.
#33
You guys slay me.........google engineer.......I'm actually a jet mechanic in the Air Force and have been for 17 years, so I know my way around tools. I worked F-16 Block 50 GE 129 motors up until 2006 and now I'm on the F-35 P&W F135 motor waiting for the GE F136 motor to come out. I KNOW you can't get 50hp out of a simple filter change but as soon as I put the K&N in the car EVERYTHING seemed to work better. I can't explain it, I can only quote my results..................and I'm done.............
#34
As I mentioned earlier, a fresh free flowing filter will cause the ECU to remap for the best, especially when coming from a dirty filter. Three days ago I went from flow-through to chambered mufflers. I literally saw the tach search up and down till it set a new idle after start up. By the way, I also gained back some low end torque too. I believe hollywoodippa lost some tenths.
#35
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Perth Ontario Canada
Posts: 11,058
Received 2,255 Likes
on
1,840 Posts
You guys slay me.........google engineer.......I'm actually a jet mechanic in the Air Force and have been for 17 years, so I know my way around tools. I worked F-16 Block 50 GE 129 motors up until 2006 and now I'm on the F-35 P&W F135 motor waiting for the GE F136 motor to come out.
#36
As I mentioned earlier, a fresh free flowing filter will cause the ECU to remap for the best, especially when coming from a dirty filter. Three days ago I went from flow-through to chambered mufflers. I literally saw the tach search up and down till it set a new idle after start up. By the way, I also gained back some low end torque too. I believe hollywoodippa lost some tenths.
#38
#39
I'll PM ChrisSTR on the switch to Dynomax Super Turbos, but I'll let yas know that she's noticeable louder in/out than the Magnaflows. The reverberation into the interior is annoyingly loud while lazily pulling up hill in higher gears. Need to pop back on the Dynomax glass packed tube pre-mufflers as a means to absorb and resonate. Did gain back some low-end torque though and she sounds real mean, LOL!
#40
hollywooddippa
Thanks for posting your install with before and after results. Hope you stay around! This forum has good repair info as well as parts sources. The S Type has been out a long time (10+ years) and most common faults have been fixed.
Not always easy to find the info either!
.
.
.
Thanks for posting your install with before and after results. Hope you stay around! This forum has good repair info as well as parts sources. The S Type has been out a long time (10+ years) and most common faults have been fixed.
Not always easy to find the info either!
.
.
.