XF and XFR ( X250 ) 2007 - 2015

2013 XF S/C Portfolio Package

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 29, 2016 | 10:09 PM
  #1  
Cherry_560sel's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Veteran Member
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 97
From: Plano, Texas
Default 2013 XF S/C Portfolio Package

What does it include?
 
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2016 | 10:35 PM
  #2  
10 XF Premium's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 675
Likes: 126
From: Davenport, Iowa
Default

Nice upgrade. I also went from a pre-facelift to a SC 13.

I can't answer your question but if I had to guess it has different rims than the Draco and a seat time upgrade (like colored stitching).

My non-portfolio 13 5.0SC came with the updated stereo, Sport seats 17 way driver/14 way pass (all black), rear power shade, blind spot monitor, heated wheel/front windshield.
 
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2016 | 10:39 PM
  #3  
Cherry_560sel's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Veteran Member
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 97
From: Plano, Texas
Default

the seat specs are different as far as adjustment variations. it does have the nice stitched piping on the seats, and the rear power shade, blind spot, heat/cooled seats and heated steering wheel.... but it comes with 18' wheels which is think is weird for a portfolio package.
 
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2016 | 10:42 PM
  #4  
10 XF Premium's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 675
Likes: 126
From: Davenport, Iowa
Default

If you are buying a V8 SC, it can't have 18" wheels.

The rotors (both front and back) cant fit anything less than 20"

If your car has the V6, I am not sure that exhaust will work on your new car.
 
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2016 | 10:55 PM
  #5  
Cherry_560sel's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Veteran Member
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 97
From: Plano, Texas
Default

The exhaust will likely need to get re-routed by the shop, but it will fit, the boxes are smaller than stock.

Yeah..i am getting the V6 S/C
 
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2016 | 11:00 PM
  #6  
10 XF Premium's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 675
Likes: 126
From: Davenport, Iowa
Default

I was confused for a bit.

I have driven plenty of the loaner v6SC cars (and T4s) when I was fighting a noisy seat in my car. They are very close in performance from the n/a v8s of old. And much more tuner gains.

You may be able to get creative with the TCP kit and make parts of it to work. I built my own setup from scratch and that kit will be a good starting point.

Have fun with your new car.
 
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2016 | 11:04 PM
  #7  
Cherry_560sel's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Veteran Member
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 97
From: Plano, Texas
Default

Thats exactly why I went with the V6 S/C instead of the 5.0L

I think the torque gains and tuning options will make it a much more 'fun' car to have. I just couldn't do much of anything else to the N/A V8.

Now I will have a reason to get back on the forums !!!! lol
 
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2016 | 11:14 PM
  #8  
10 XF Premium's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 675
Likes: 126
From: Davenport, Iowa
Default

You may be in luck with the TCP intake.

https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/x...intake-162702/
 
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2016 | 09:56 AM
  #9  
Swimref's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 583
Likes: 109
From: Everett, WA
Default

Originally Posted by Cherry_560sel
Thats exactly why I went with the V6 S/C instead of the 5.0L

I think the torque gains and tuning options will make it a much more 'fun' car to have. I just couldn't do much of anything else to the N/A V8.

Now I will have a reason to get back on the forums !!!! lol
I don't understand why you would think the 3 liter 6 cylinder could match torque with the 5 liter 8 cylinder. The V-8 spec is 380 lb.-ft. compared to the V-6 at either 332 or 339, depending on variant. That is a substantial difference that no tuner can make up outside the world of false promises. Note that hotter tuning of the SC V-6 produces a gain of 40 hp in the upgraded engine, but only 7 more lb.-ft. of torque. Further aftermarket tuning will undoubtedly get you near or over 400 in hp, but still almost certainly below 345 in torque, which is still roughly 10% less than the NA V-8.
 
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2016 | 10:28 AM
  #10  
stmcknig's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,219
Likes: 284
From: Austin TX
Default

I think it's more along the lines that the options for N/A engines are more limited than their super/turbo charged cousins. Same happened over in the Audi camp when the 4.2L V8 transitioned to the ubiquitous SC V6 3.0L everybody seems to be using as a V8 stand in.
 
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2016 | 10:24 PM
  #11  
Cherry_560sel's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Veteran Member
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 97
From: Plano, Texas
Default

holy ****...is that your new F Type?

Yes...I did everything that can be done to a N/A V8 short of messing with major engine work. I just think that with the available tunes and pulley upgrades I will be able to have a more customized car and get better enjoyment...I love my V8, but I also know that it is getting up there in miles and in age, so it's time to let it go. I can;t really say that I would be able to utilize all of the power from a newer S/C V8 even though those cars carry more prestige and give power bragging rights to their owners. My goals for this car are:

1. having a 'custom' aspect to it.
2. Being able to keep pace or outpull a IS350 or a C Class or a 335i.
3. The fact that it is NOT one of those cars is pretty cool.
4. I can take the leggy blond to the opera and scare people in the parking garage
with a freakish sound!!!
5. Have something newer to drive.

I hope to eventually move into a new XFR, but I can't take the new car depreciation hit right now and jumping into a new car every four years won't accomplish anything towards getting into that XFR
 
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2016 | 11:16 PM
  #12  
stmcknig's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,219
Likes: 284
From: Austin TX
Default

Originally Posted by Cherry_560sel
holy ****...is that your new F Type?
Yes it is. Heart signed the papers whilst head was looking the other way...took a hit on the XFR considering what I had invested in her recently (new tires, brakes, rotors etc) but sometimes you have to just say WTF...


 
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2016 | 12:19 AM
  #13  
Cherry_560sel's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Veteran Member
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 97
From: Plano, Texas
Default

:icon_ clapclap::icon_clapc lap:
 
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2016 | 10:41 AM
  #14  
Injekter's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 515
Likes: 72
From: ORYGON
Default

MY guess, is that a tuned S/C v8 would blow away a tuned S/c v6....... just my guess. ive looked at the zero to 60 times un tuned between to v6 and v8 and they are not even in the same ball park im sure a more knowledgeable member will chime in but if i had a NA v8 and wanted something faster a S/C v6 i dont think is gonna do it imo
 
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2016 | 10:55 AM
  #15  
stmcknig's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,219
Likes: 284
From: Austin TX
Default

My tuned and pulleyed 5.0 V8 XFR was putting out 500WHP so the F-Type is probably slower but I've never had a coupe before and wanted to ditch the sensible rear seats ;-)

I've got the VelocityAP tune on the way though...
 
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2016 | 03:34 PM
  #16  
OzXFR's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 9,016
Likes: 3,657
From: Adelaide, South Australia
Default

I went from a tuned XFR (XKR-S tune plus a few other tweaks) to a V6S F-Type, and yes the XFR is quicker and faster. But not much quicker 0-60, traction and wheelspin are still a problem. It's the mid-range and throttle response where the XFR kills the V6 F-type, at anything over 60 mph the XFR walks away from it and the instant "shove in the back" is much stronger.
 
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2016 | 05:10 PM
  #17  
Injekter's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 515
Likes: 72
From: ORYGON
Default

Originally Posted by stmcknig
My tuned and pulleyed 5.0 V8 XFR was putting out 500WHP so the F-Type is probably slower but I've never had a coupe before and wanted to ditch the sensible rear seats ;-)

I've got the VelocityAP tune on the way though...
same motor in the F, but i was referring to the op thats going from a NA v8 XF to a S/C v6 XF and i agree on the tuned v8 XF fastest car ive ever had.... thats not saying too much i know....but its pretty fast
 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2016 | 12:48 AM
  #18  
Cherry_560sel's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Veteran Member
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 97
From: Plano, Texas
Default

Its obviously not going to go head to head with a V8 blown engine. But it's SUPERCHARGED !!! It will be my first !!!
 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2016 | 10:08 AM
  #19  
Injekter's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 515
Likes: 72
From: ORYGON
Default

Originally Posted by Cherry_560sel
Its obviously not going to go head to head with a V8 blown engine. But it's SUPERCHARGED !!! It will be my first !!!
WELL....tune it and enjoy
 
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:58 PM.