XJ XJ8 / XJR ( X308 ) 1997 - 2003

Tensioners Again!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 15, 2017 | 01:53 PM
  #1  
David Stevens's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 97
Likes: 2
From: WV
Default Tensioners Again!

I've been reading a lot about replacing the secondary tensioners on our x308's. Lately I have stumbled on a post saying sometime in 2002 they fixed the problem and if your x308 had a VIN number greater than xxxxxx you should be good. I have a x308 vdp with 121000 on the clock. I've spent the winter doing preventive and fixing things. Coil packs, shock mounts, Interiour etc. I was ready to tackle the tensioners but I'm treading lightly. Anyway my VIN ends in 40511. Can anyone shed a light before I break it apart. Is mine a factory fix or do I need to look anyway.

Thanks all for helping me.
David
 
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2017 | 02:23 PM
  #2  
Addicted2boost's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 3,125
Likes: 1,279
Default

F41862 and higher have the updated tensioners. Assuming they haven't been updated in the past, you have the plastic tensioners.
 
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2017 | 02:25 PM
  #3  
David Stevens's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 97
Likes: 2
From: WV
Default

My luck at least I was planning on that anyway.

Thank you much
 
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2017 | 05:55 PM
  #4  
ericjansen's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 3,256
Likes: 1,370
From: Taiwan, R.O.C.
Default

Originally Posted by David Stevens
My luck at least I was planning on that anyway
With that settled, a word of advise: If you opt to do the secondaries yourself with the zip-tie method, be absolutely sure you rotate the relevant camshaft in such position that ALL lobs are without tension (no valve pressed).

Only in this position you can lift the camshaft, and torque it back without putting stress in it.
Doing otherwise might result into a broken camshaft!
 
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2017 | 08:23 PM
  #5  
JBzXJ40's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 859
Likes: 321
From: Auckland NZ/ Houston, TX
Default

If you're just doing secondary tensioners, you need to make sure the flat spots on the cams are facing at 12 in relation to cylinder head position. You're going to need to hold the cams in place, loosen the bolt on the exhaust cam and remove. Take the sprocket out, and you can sneak the tensioner out without loosening any cam caps. Done it this way many many times. However its best to do the whole lot. Have seen primaries fail in the past.
 
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2017 | 08:56 PM
  #6  
Amphicar770's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 259
Likes: 60
Default

Others may beg to differ but renting the tools makes the job very easy and eliminates the risks associated with the zip tie method.
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2017 | 03:29 AM
  #7  
Daim's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 5,906
Likes: 2,182
From: Bremen, Germany
Default

Originally Posted by Amphicar770
Others may beg to differ but renting the tools makes the job very easy and eliminates the risks associated with the zip tie method.
Especially as the lower tensioners are most likely cracked as well.
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2017 | 11:06 AM
  #8  
RJ237's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 8,833
Likes: 2,920
From: Douglasville Ga.
Default

The primaries are not subjected to the high temp from the cylinder heads and are likely to last a lot longer.
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2017 | 11:27 AM
  #9  
Daim's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 5,906
Likes: 2,182
From: Bremen, Germany
Default

Originally Posted by RJ237
The primaries are not subjected to the high temp from the cylinder heads and are likely to last a lot longer.
Tell my former tensioners then, that they shouldn't crack They did. As well as the guides... The guides were actually falling apart.
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2017 | 06:31 PM
  #10  
ericjansen's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 3,256
Likes: 1,370
From: Taiwan, R.O.C.
Default

I do agree that it is better to have them all exchanged, they might not fail as fast as the secondaries, but their plastics disintegrate in the same fashion.

However, the big difference is that the secondaries can fail catastrophically without warning, where the primaries should (..) start giving an indication by rattling without such catastrophe.

I myself only changed the top ones so far, with the primaries and new chains still in the box ..
Basically because I don't have the facilities to do them all myself, and as I still did not find the person I trust to do it for me.
 

Last edited by ericjansen; Mar 17, 2017 at 06:34 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2017 | 07:41 PM
  #11  
nilanium's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,462
Likes: 515
From: MD, USA
Default

Bought the car at 98k with a rattle caused by the primary guide failing. Secondaries were the original plastic style, with a slight cracking but no obvious failure yet. Not sure if either were replaced in the car's past. That middle piece on the right was fished out of the oil pan. Luckily it was the guide side and not the tensioner side that failed, if it had been the tensioned side then it's possible the chain could have skipped.
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2017 | 08:00 PM
  #12  
RJ237's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 8,833
Likes: 2,920
From: Douglasville Ga.
Default

It's possible the engine had overheated in the past. But I'm not disagreeing with you in that it's better to change everything. If I hear a rattle at startup I will certainly be ordering the parts, but until then I have other things to take up my limited budget.
 
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2017 | 09:29 AM
  #13  
Brutal's Avatar
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 7,255
Likes: 2,209
From: Damon /Houston, Texas
Default

updated style tensioners does NOT MEAN BULLETPROOF!!!
 
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2017 | 09:27 AM
  #14  
yeldogt's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,887
Likes: 344
From: NE
Default

Brutal: Have you ever seen any documentation from Jaguar regarding the final metal tensioners?

I was told many years ago that no x308 got the final metal .. only the second generation. When I discussed the August 2001 changeover -- my friend (a long time Jaguar parts manager told me ... no) he even confirmed with the head mechanic that they had replaced many 2002's.
 
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2017 | 11:04 AM
  #15  
motorcarman's Avatar
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 13,646
Likes: 9,583
From: Wise County,TX
Default

From Engine (0108130000) onward.... ALL 4.0 engines had Silent Running Primaries and all metal bodied tensioners!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The newer style oil pump was used with the newer chain setup.

bob
 
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2017 | 02:08 PM
  #16  
Sean B's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 4,878
Likes: 1,424
From: Sunny Southport UK
Default

Yep as Bob states from August 13th 2001 starting with chassis number F41862 all AJ27 were upgraded to AJ27S with the forthcoming stroked 4.2 timing gear and pump. There aren't many compared to prior units but they are about.
The 2002MY in the UK are MY2001 and it'd have to be a late USA MY02 to have that version of the engine. The USA MY03 cars will have them, but they'll be rare as the production in the UK finished summer 2002 with the forthcoming X350 and changeover of factory from Brown's to Whitley.
 

Last edited by Sean B; Mar 19, 2017 at 02:11 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2017 | 09:16 PM
  #17  
yeldogt's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,887
Likes: 344
From: NE
Default

The 02 XJR I bought new has a late August 01 production date -- F45829. My other one is much later .....

41863 was the start of 02 production in 8/01

Got the engine number from the dealer years ago -- In my files ..... someplace.
 
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:40 AM.