Sights N Sounds Post all of your video and sounds clips here.

XFR vs. 2010 CTS-V...who wins?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 09-02-2010, 11:08 PM
VetteOwner's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Aspen Hill, Maryland
Posts: 127
Received 18 Likes on 14 Posts
Default XFR vs. 2010 CTS-V...who wins?

Saw this on a Caddy forum and thought you'd enjoy it! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-Njt3xSibI
 
  #2  
Old 09-04-2010, 06:29 AM
Brunos's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Love it !!! Yeah !

Well now...watch this one : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=59fybrrUGEw&NR=1

BTW - What is the "real" 0-62MPH for the XKR ?
On the technical spec (conservative), it's 4.6s for the Coupe.

Car & Driver tested the new XKR 2010 : 4.0s ! (CTS-V is 3.9s to 4.1s depending on the tests) - So VERY close !!

"...It needed just 4.0 seconds to sprint to 60 and 8.8 seconds to reach 100 and rushed through the quarter in 12.3 seconds at 119 mph. If the car hooked up better, the times would likely have been even more impressive. Compared with the previous XKR, we achieved a shorter 70-to-0-mph stopping distance (160 feet versus 163), along with more grip on the skidpad—0.92 g, up from 0.89."
 
  #3  
Old 09-28-2010, 07:21 AM
MassiSandage's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: CA
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

They say the DCT clutch-auto transmission makes for gnarly acceleration runs from a dig. It optimizes wheel spin. 4.0sec to 60mph is incredible, and it beats the E55 and E63 previous gen models. The new suspension is reportedly vastly improved as well.
 
  #4  
Old 09-28-2010, 06:26 PM
sempire's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 75
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Looks like slow motion. Probably driven by 75 year old retirees
 
  #5  
Old 07-04-2011, 03:13 PM
TomServo's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Illinois
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Brunos
Love it !!! Yeah !

Well now...watch this one : YouTube - ‪Cadillac CTS-V vs Jag XFR - Drag Race‬‏

BTW - What is the "real" 0-62MPH for the XKR ?
On the technical spec (conservative), it's 4.6s for the Coupe.

Car & Driver tested the new XKR 2010 : 4.0s ! (CTS-V is 3.9s to 4.1s depending on the tests) - So VERY close !!

"...It needed just 4.0 seconds to sprint to 60 and 8.8 seconds to reach 100 and rushed through the quarter in 12.3 seconds at 119 mph. If the car hooked up better, the times would likely have been even more impressive. Compared with the previous XKR, we achieved a shorter 70-to-0-mph stopping distance (160 feet versus 163), along with more grip on the skidpad—0.92 g, up from 0.89."
Not bad for a car that costs about $65K before dealer discounts.

Tom
 
  #6  
Old 07-04-2011, 03:27 PM
porkenstein's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 224
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

CTS V would definitely win on a longer race such as a road race due to the fact that the Jag would have to stop many times for repairs.
 
  #7  
Old 07-05-2011, 08:32 PM
amcdonal86's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Arlington, VA USA
Posts: 6,290
Received 482 Likes on 403 Posts
Default

Surprised that the XF-R was even close! Would've thought the CTS-V would've blown it away!
 
  #8  
Old 07-05-2011, 09:01 PM
Ipc838's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Tulsa, OK, United States
Posts: 908
Received 110 Likes on 83 Posts
Default

I'm thinking the Jag is slower, but it's easier to make the Jag go fast. The CTS-V is supposed to be hard to squeeze all the performance out of.
 
  #9  
Old 07-06-2011, 04:16 AM
Cadillac's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Planetarium
Posts: 11,380
Received 637 Likes on 439 Posts
Default

Still, XFR not to be sneezed at and I think if someone like THE STIG gets in XFR and CTS-V driven by an average driver , results may vary
 
  #10  
Old 11-09-2011, 10:20 AM
hobeXFR's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: florida
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default XFR go faster, how?

Easy to make the XFR go faster? I'm all ears...
 
  #11  
Old 11-10-2011, 06:29 AM
TomServo's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Illinois
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

I sold my 07 Z06 to buy my wife the 08 Jag XK (BTW it's going to the dealer for the 5th time in 6 months on a flatbed tomorrow) and have been out shopping for a "toy" for me and found a pre-owned 11 CPO CTS-V coupe with 6K miles for $57K. That's got to be one of the best automotive deals in the performance car market on the planet.

But sadly until I get the 08 XK fixed (warranty expires on the 20th and the dealer better fix the bugs this time) I can't spend any $$ on toys.

Tom
 
  #12  
Old 11-15-2011, 07:43 AM
Brunos's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Tom, sorry to hear about your issues on your 08 XK.
I just wanted to share my personal experience...I own a 2010 XKR (new generation), and didnt get any issue so far...0
I love this car, and would buy it again.
I also add the chance to test the CTS-V coupe on a track, at Monticello.
This is indeed a beast, very powerful, and for the money...difficult for the competition.
Now, the automatic transmission is slower than the XKR, and the interior cannot compete..as far as the design is concern I really prefer the Jag, it's a personal choice, but I get questions each time I stop at the Gas station...XKR is very attractive, looks like an Ashton Martin, and we know why. I love this !
Lastly, there is no Gas guzzler on the XKR...My average is 21 miles per gallons. You won't get this with the CTS-V, more around 12 !!
Good luck for your next car
Bruno
 
  #13  
Old 11-21-2011, 11:07 PM
White Out's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location:
Posts: 64
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Wow. I am really surprised the XFR is on par with the CTSV at the 1/4. I really expected the V to pull away hard from the R. Good work Jag!
Originally Posted by ianclements
I'm thinking the Jag is slower, but it's easier to make the Jag go fast. The CTS-V is supposed to be hard to squeeze all the performance out of.
LOL
LSA needs a pulley and a tune for 600hp. Then there is the exhaust, intake, porting supercharger, etc. The LSx has such massive aftermarket support, that switching to twins is not difficult (pricey) and when the LSA internals start to become the weak point, there is the factory LS9 parts, if aftermarket boosted parts for the 6.2 aren't your fancy.

Nick
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rocky15
XJ ( X351 )
3
10-12-2015 03:42 AM
bydand
XF and XFR ( X250 )
8
09-28-2015 09:47 AM
bydand
XF and XFR ( X250 )
1
09-27-2015 12:00 PM
ChrisJay
XF and XFR ( X250 )
2
09-27-2015 09:08 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: XFR vs. 2010 CTS-V...who wins?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:55 AM.