XF and XFR ( X250 ) 2007 - 2015

XFR Dyno revisted today

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 06-19-2012, 01:24 PM
BigCat09's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Orlando, Florida
Posts: 1,051
Received 357 Likes on 174 Posts
Arrow XFR Dyno revisted today

So , I thought I would revist the Dyno today to do some more research.
This time I decided to use a DynoJet Dyno to see how much variance there is from Dyno to Dyno. With all things compared in the end this particual DynoJet made 5whp more than the SuperFlow I tested prior.

I did forget to add the tail pipe A/F sniffer but we already know the readings. Do notice that each of these 3 runs were made back to back without any cooling time and the numbers kept rising each time. Usually the number go lower after each pull.

 
The following 2 users liked this post by BigCat09:
Bruce H. (06-20-2012), WRXtranceformed (06-07-2014)
  #2  
Old 06-20-2012, 07:07 AM
Bruce H.'s Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Dunsford, Ontario
Posts: 1,262
Received 325 Likes on 201 Posts
Default

That is one very impressive powerband! Do you have any further plans to unleash more power? Thanks for sharing, and helping to blaze a trail to the Holy Grail of power for the few of us that are keenly interested.

Bruce
 
  #3  
Old 06-20-2012, 07:23 AM
BigCat09's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Orlando, Florida
Posts: 1,051
Received 357 Likes on 174 Posts
Default

If I feel the need to make another 100whp I can do the snake bite kit and the killer chiller . Then change the pulley to add 1 more psi of boost and then have it remapped. That will get it to the 600whp mark undoubtably as it has been proven on a similiar engine already. From there things will start t ofatigue and takes loads of stress but I figure that would be the max I would do.Remember, my tune and mods are very conservative at this point, there is no added stress added to the motor ,yet
 
  #4  
Old 06-20-2012, 07:26 AM
BigCat09's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Orlando, Florida
Posts: 1,051
Received 357 Likes on 174 Posts
  #5  
Old 06-21-2012, 01:29 PM
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 34
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Stop this. You're making me want to trade in my SC for an R haha.
 
  #6  
Old 06-21-2012, 02:01 PM
BigCat09's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Orlando, Florida
Posts: 1,051
Received 357 Likes on 174 Posts
Default

^ Just tune yours and save the money you would on a R model^. I bet you would be satisfied with modding the one you have now, and youll save money in the end.
 
  #7  
Old 07-11-2012, 10:36 PM
Kraatz's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Houston
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 2010 XF S/C dyno results

Dyno'd my stock XF S/C and got 431.4 rwhp. Seamed high for a car that is 470 at the engine. The second pull was 423 rwhp.

Anyone else get numbers like this?

I wanted to check the hp and afr before I started working on the upgrades.
 
  #8  
Old 07-11-2012, 10:43 PM
Bruce H.'s Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Dunsford, Ontario
Posts: 1,262
Received 325 Likes on 201 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kraatz
Dyno'd my stock XF S/C and got 431.4 rwhp. Seamed high for a car that is 470 at the engine. The second pull was 423 rwhp.

Anyone else get numbers like this?

I wanted to check the hp and afr before I started working on the upgrades.
What type of dyno did you use? Can you post post it along with AFR?
 
  #9  
Old 07-12-2012, 12:18 AM
avos's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,615
Received 1,063 Likes on 759 Posts
Default

Can you post the dyno slip, and also tell what correction has been used (ie DIN, SAE STD)?
 
  #10  
Old 07-12-2012, 06:34 AM
cwood's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Aurora Ontario
Posts: 331
Received 35 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kraatz
Dyno'd my stock XF S/C and got 431.4 rwhp. Seamed high for a car that is 470 at the engine. The second pull was 423 rwhp.

Anyone else get numbers like this?

I wanted to check the hp and afr before I started working on the upgrades.
Does sound a bit high. 15% driveline loss would be expected...which would leave you about 400.
 
  #11  
Old 07-13-2012, 12:37 PM
Jason S.'s Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You really can't use a percentage for driveline loss as a rule of thumb. I.e. a 1000rwhp car isn't losing 150hp to the trans, and only 75 hp at 500. Modern transmissions are extremely efficient. My xfr dyno'd 460 to the tires stock, my m5 447 to the wheels. I have dyno'd autos and manual trans' in the same type car with the same engine with nearly identical results, so I think a lot of that percentage loss is out the window with the newer transmissions.
 
  #12  
Old 07-13-2012, 12:54 PM
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Damon /Houston, Texas
Posts: 7,254
Received 2,184 Likes on 1,356 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jason s.
you really can't use a percentage for driveline loss as a rule of thumb. I.e. A 1000rwhp car isn't losing 150hp to the trans, and only 75 hp at 500. Modern transmissions are extremely efficient. My xfr dyno'd 460 to the tires stock, my m5 447 to the wheels. I have dyno'd autos and manual trans' in the same type car with the same engine with nearly identical results, so i think a lot of that percentage loss is out the window with the newer transmissions.
true, just change the wheels and tires to heavier and watch your numbers drop
 
  #13  
Old 07-13-2012, 02:05 PM
BigCat09's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Orlando, Florida
Posts: 1,051
Received 357 Likes on 174 Posts
Default

This is why you should use the same dyno and conditions as close as possible for stock and then modded dyno runs to see where the results lye. There are way to many factors to compare your dyno vs mine and others for these reasons. For me I could care less if my car made 410 -440- 460 rwhp stock long as I see the improvement %'s from the mods that get done.
 
  #14  
Old 07-13-2012, 04:55 PM
Jason S.'s Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just stick with a dynojet, and you will get comparable numbers.
 
  #15  
Old 07-14-2012, 12:49 AM
avos's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,615
Received 1,063 Likes on 759 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jason S.
Just stick with a dynojet, and you will get comparable numbers.
Yes, most on this forum experience issues with the dynos that have 2 small drums per wheel, better avoid them.

But without having some base info of the run, the values shown from kraatz have no meaning.

And last but not least, if you don't have this base info, you can't be sure if a next time the settings are the same.
 
  #16  
Old 07-14-2012, 02:55 PM
Kraatz's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Houston
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 2010 XF S/C Dyno

House got hit by lighting so I'm using my iPad. It will take a few days but I'll post the Dino run and find out all the other requested info. SerioudHp in Houston did the Dino.

Regards
 
  #17  
Old 07-14-2012, 04:39 PM
Kraatz's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Houston
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 2010 XF S/C Dyno

New to dyno'ing a car so let me know what info I should get....

Dyno manufacturer
Correction factor
Amb Temp?
.
.

I can always do another run if needed to so that I have a good baseline.

Thanks
 
  #18  
Old 07-18-2012, 11:06 AM
Kraatz's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Houston
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 2010 XF S/C Dyno

Find the attached dyno for the second pull. I'm still waiting on answers from SeriousHP on the correction factor and the AFR print out.

XFR Dyno revisted today-jaguardyno.jpg

This all started because I was hearing a ticking noise during full throttle. Didn't sound like pinging but Jaguar did the following bulletin JTB00241NAS1. The car still makes the ticking noise. I wanted to check the AFR to see where I was at. The car ran ~14 at idle but dropped to 9-10 during each of the pulls. I would like to replace the exhaust, install high flow cats and do an ECU tune but I want to make sure everything is 100% before I start.

Jaguar Bulletin.pdf

Any ideas on the noise? Almost sounds like the A/C fan.

Thanks,
 
  #19  
Old 08-30-2012, 11:27 PM
Jason S.'s Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Found something interesting today.....my XFR is in the shop getting some warranty work, and they gave me an 11 xf supercharged one for a loaner. So I decided to put it on my dyno and see the difference. Suprisingly, the peak hp was within 5 of the XFR, but the midrange was down about 30whp or so. I was also able to record A/f on this one and it stays about 12 to 1 all the way up until the last 500rpm then drops steady to 11.3 to 1. When I get the XFR back I am going to do some further testing and see where it's at. Does anyone know a good spot to pick up as a boost reference on these things??????
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JagBrian
F-Type ( X152 )
86
08-18-2019 05:07 PM
RaceDiagnostics
XK8 / XKR ( X100 )
20
11-10-2015 11:05 AM
SeismicGuy
XK8 / XKR ( X100 )
28
10-14-2015 09:33 AM
Johncy2000
XJ ( X351 )
0
09-16-2015 05:44 PM
Bob Gelston
XJ XJ6 / XJ8 / XJR ( X350 & X358 )
8
09-14-2015 11:08 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: XFR Dyno revisted today



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:38 AM.