XJ6 & XJ12 Series I, II & III 1968-1992
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Reducing Power steering sensitivity

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 12-08-2017, 07:22 AM
iramphal's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Lincoln Ontario
Posts: 602
Received 222 Likes on 120 Posts
Question Reducing Power steering sensitivity

Morning,
Just awoke from a night dreaming of whether it is possible to slightly reduce the level of power steering sensitivity on a SIII XJ6.

Is there any reason that a slight reduction in pump regulated fluid output pressure could not be utilized to reduce the effective boost level of steering assist?

I believe these pumps were used on a whole range of different cars, so there must be an output pressure regulating valve that can be swapped or reset to a lower output pressure. Or am I just dreaming? Ian
 
  #2  
Old 12-08-2017, 07:48 AM
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Adelaide Stralia
Posts: 27,301
Received 10,309 Likes on 6,819 Posts
Default

Not dreaming.

GM, Ford, Toyota, and others all used that Saginaw pump.

Some pump outlet valves are o/ring seal, others are a flare seal, so would pay to check your pipe first.

Memory, HAHA, is the Ford circa 1978ish is a lower pressure valve. We used to sell them under different preseures at work, but that was 25+ years ago, and I dont remember 100%.

Any rebuild hydraulic people will know what is what.

The later, 1992ish V12 XJS had a less sensitive steer, and the rack and pump are the same, just a different valve.
 
  #3  
Old 12-08-2017, 07:48 AM
Doug's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest USA
Posts: 24,743
Received 10,757 Likes on 7,101 Posts
Default

I know it can be done but am not familiar with the specifics.

If nobody chimes in with an answer try Googling "Saginaw power steering pump modifications" or something like that.

Cheers
DD
 
  #4  
Old 12-08-2017, 08:35 AM
iramphal's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Lincoln Ontario
Posts: 602
Received 222 Likes on 120 Posts
Default

Thanks guys - at least I'm on the right track. Just trying to get a bit more feedback/feeling into the steering. I like to feel the road a bit, as opposed to the "floating above the ground" that I currently get. Time to do some research - another winter project - I'll be an expert by springtime!
 
  #5  
Old 12-08-2017, 08:47 AM
JagCad's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Walnut Creek, California
Posts: 6,796
Received 2,399 Likes on 1,880 Posts
Default

Yes.


I recall reading of alterations in an off road magazine. Can't cite it, but Doug's suggestion just might hit it. It involves spring tension and orifice sizing.


And, Andrew Weinberg's site, Jaguar-Specialties touches on the issue.


And, somewhere in cyberspace on hydraulics, just might be a valve to introduce into the hoses to adjust the PSI delivered to the rack.


The later LT1 PS pump on my car works just about right as to steering input. But, it is a completely different pump. Adaptation ???


Carl
 
  #6  
Old 12-08-2017, 08:54 AM
Doug's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest USA
Posts: 24,743
Received 10,757 Likes on 7,101 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by iramphal
Thanks guys - at least I'm on the right track. Just trying to get a bit more feedback/feeling into the steering. I like to feel the road a bit, as opposed to the "floating above the ground" that I currently get.

In addition to investigating reducing the amount of assist also check you alignment settings.

Lack of positive caster can give a sort of loosey-goosey feeling to the steering.... as can worn steering rack bushings.

I always ask the alignment guy to come as close as he can to maximum allowable positive caster and negative camber.

Cheers
DD
 
  #7  
Old 12-08-2017, 09:00 AM
JagCad's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Walnut Creek, California
Posts: 6,796
Received 2,399 Likes on 1,880 Posts
Default

Yup. I've noted an extreme "slant" on Mercedes and Bimmer wheels when at full lock. Indicative of lots of caster.


Oddly, my IHC Scout II had negative caster, a lot it. Odd looking wheels when at full lock. Steered just fine !!! And it seemed to enable a very tight turning radius. Why, beats me....
Carl
 

Trending Topics

  #8  
Old 12-08-2017, 09:31 AM
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Wise County,TX
Posts: 11,891
Received 7,878 Likes on 4,762 Posts
Default

I don't remember the exact Castor specs for the sedan but the XJ-S was about 1 or 2 degrees MORE positive and the steering effort was increased.

You can set the Castor to 4.5 degrees? like the XJ-S instead of the 3 degrees? for the sedan.

bob
 
  #9  
Old 12-08-2017, 09:50 AM
Doug's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest USA
Posts: 24,743
Received 10,757 Likes on 7,101 Posts
Default

There are two (maybe three) specs for the Series III sedans: 12 cylinder, early 6 cylinder, late 6 cylinder. It might be that the V12 and late 6 cylinder were the same or very close.

The 'late' 6 cylinder specification coincides with the change in upper control arms...circa 1983. The control arms were changed to the same ones used on the V12s and the XJS. Slightly different geometry.

Cheers
DD
 
  #10  
Old 12-08-2017, 11:08 AM
icsamerica's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: New York City
Posts: 2,200
Received 1,359 Likes on 790 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Doug
There are two (maybe three) specs for the Series III sedans: 12 cylinder, early 6 cylinder, late 6 cylinder. It might be that the V12 and late 6 cylinder were the same or very close.

The 'late' 6 cylinder specification coincides with the change in upper control arms...circa 1983. The control arms were changed to the same ones used on the V12s and the XJS. Slightly different geometry.

Cheers
DD
Reducing overall power steering pressure is not the way to go. It will do something but very little for low pressure situations like changing lanes slowly or just general driving. Reducing the pressure will cause high momentary effort during emergency maneuvers like a situation where you have to avoid hitting a person or another car.

The torsen bar in the rack affects feel and is not easy for a hobbyist to get to.

It would be ideal to find a rack from a late XJS. The later the better as I don't know exactly when they increased steering effort. I use 1995 XJS rack on all my projects. They boarder on stiff in parting lot situation but on the road they are perfect. I always retain the stock pump and pressure.

It would be good to check your alignment but this is not where the difference lies. The xj6 xj12 xjs and db7 all have nearly identical alignment settings yet all drive and feel very different.
 

Last edited by icsamerica; 12-08-2017 at 11:16 AM.
The following users liked this post:
Doug (12-08-2017)
  #11  
Old 12-08-2017, 11:22 AM
Doug's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest USA
Posts: 24,743
Received 10,757 Likes on 7,101 Posts
Default

I think the XJS "sportpack" steering rack is what you're thinking of....which I believe was standard issue on USA market V12 cars 1989-later.

Some research required as to the spacers that limited maximum wheel travel used on these racks, though. I can't remember if they're removable...or what. But you probably wouldn't want the spacers on a sedan

Cheers
DD
 
  #12  
Old 12-08-2017, 12:07 PM
Doug's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest USA
Posts: 24,743
Received 10,757 Likes on 7,101 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by icsamerica
It would be good to check your alignment but this is not where the difference lies. The xj6 xj12 xjs and db7 all have nearly identical alignment settings yet all drive and feel very different.
Lot of different elements make up the overall feel of any given car.

Tweaking the alignment settings CAN provide a noticeable difference in steering feel. If, for example, the caster is set at minimum spec and then changed to maximum spec, the driver should expect to feel a difference in the way the steering feels/behaves.

Cheers
DD
 
  #13  
Old 12-08-2017, 05:31 PM
icsamerica's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: New York City
Posts: 2,200
Received 1,359 Likes on 790 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Doug
Lot of different elements make up the overall feel of any given car.

Tweaking the alignment settings CAN provide a noticeable difference in steering feel. If, for example, the caster is set at minimum spec and then changed to maximum spec, the driver should expect to feel a difference in the way the steering feels/behaves.

Cheers
DD
Absolutely. I run an non standard amount of caster on the red coupe... It's becasue I like the wheel to snap back like a 90's BMW. As a performance enthusiast I accept the tire wear implications as I'm not putting 15k a year on the tires and will likely replace them becasue of new technology or age before they wear unevenly.

With a bit more caster you get a bit more feel but some many alignment shops wont do non standard specs becasue of liability. I had to learn to do my own alignment with a string box and a camber gauge. Then I adjust caster until I get the the feel I like.
 
  #14  
Old 12-10-2017, 06:47 PM
xjfourty's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 425
Received 18 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Well I have the opposite problem. The steering wheel on my xj6 III is not sensitive as I would like ti to be, then suddenly after rotating it half way it starts to get much more sensitive. it is not linear in the behavior like perhaps it should be. I can't say for sure though because this is the only xj6 III I had in my life, so I cannot say what is the normal steering behavior.
 
  #15  
Old 12-10-2017, 07:08 PM
Doug's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest USA
Posts: 24,743
Received 10,757 Likes on 7,101 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by xjfourty
Well I have the opposite problem. The steering wheel on my xj6 III is not sensitive as I would like ti to be, then suddenly after rotating it half way it starts to get much more sensitive. it is not linear in the behavior like perhaps it should be. I can't say for sure though because this is the only xj6 III I had in my life, so I cannot say what is the normal steering behavior.
Not normal.

Check your steering rack bushings, pronto !

Cheers
DD
 
The following users liked this post:
xjfourty (12-10-2017)
  #16  
Old 12-10-2017, 07:21 PM
xjfourty's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 425
Received 18 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

thanks
 
  #17  
Old 12-12-2017, 04:20 PM
Cabel's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Maryland
Posts: 167
Received 38 Likes on 31 Posts
  #18  
Old 12-13-2017, 11:13 AM
sidescrollin's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Key West, FL
Posts: 2,456
Received 693 Likes on 562 Posts
Default

Take the pump to a machine shop and have them produce a larger pulley?
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
goingwhere
X-Type ( X400 )
20
08-31-2016 05:40 AM
BlkCat
XK8 / XKR ( X100 )
6
02-04-2011 08:48 AM
shakerxf
Jaguar Forums Feedback & Suggestion Center
4
07-28-2008 12:28 PM
shakerxf
XF and XFR ( X250 )
10
07-24-2008 01:18 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: Reducing Power steering sensitivity



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:25 AM.