XJ6 Series 1 - Fuel tank - why not?
Dear fellowmen and women, - novise on this forum, happy to join and learn/share experiences.
Now - fuel tanks and water..., we've read and experienced all, water entering our fuel tanks, drain pipes clogged, o-rings dried out, rusty tanks, engine struggling etc etc.
So - I am thinking where does all this water actually enter the tanks?
I am no hydrologist or plumber -not even technically skilled, but it struck me that (least on my own 69 series 1 - see image) the top of the neck of the tank filler hole (A on image) appears to be positioned far too low - at (or even below) level of the wing (B) - it simply allows water "flowing" in...
Therefore - I'd be happy if it could be explained to me why the height of the the neck of tank the fill hole (still A) - is not higher - more elevated relative to the wing (B) - obviously because I think this would simply prevent water from "flowing" directly in.
Would a possible solution be to increase the height of the neck (A) at least 1, maybe 2 centimetres above level og B, and would this prevent (or minimize) the amount af water entering tank? (All the above remedies of drain pipies, O-ring etc etc in addition of course).
Happy to hear comments.
Now - fuel tanks and water..., we've read and experienced all, water entering our fuel tanks, drain pipes clogged, o-rings dried out, rusty tanks, engine struggling etc etc.
So - I am thinking where does all this water actually enter the tanks?
I am no hydrologist or plumber -not even technically skilled, but it struck me that (least on my own 69 series 1 - see image) the top of the neck of the tank filler hole (A on image) appears to be positioned far too low - at (or even below) level of the wing (B) - it simply allows water "flowing" in...
Therefore - I'd be happy if it could be explained to me why the height of the the neck of tank the fill hole (still A) - is not higher - more elevated relative to the wing (B) - obviously because I think this would simply prevent water from "flowing" directly in.
Would a possible solution be to increase the height of the neck (A) at least 1, maybe 2 centimetres above level og B, and would this prevent (or minimize) the amount af water entering tank? (All the above remedies of drain pipies, O-ring etc etc in addition of course).
Happy to hear comments.
@Jose - may be you re onto something. For sure something not all right. The wing is original (only one-owner car...), however the tank might have been replaced (series II tank?) - could that possibly explain "gap"?
@Roger - dont know, but guessing-if tank has been replaced-a serie III ank would not fit a series I-right?
Norboy
@Roger - dont know, but guessing-if tank has been replaced-a serie III ank would not fit a series I-right?
Norboy
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dleckste
XJ6 & XJ12 Series I, II & III
15
Sep 2, 2021 07:23 PM
Undertaker
XJ6 & XJ12 Series I, II & III
1
Feb 24, 2014 01:19 AM
jdoc84
XJ6 & XJ12 Series I, II & III
9
Oct 15, 2012 06:28 AM
amcdonal86
XJ6 & XJ12 Series I, II & III
38
Jan 19, 2012 10:00 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)







