XJS ( X27 ) 1975 - 1996 3.6 4.0 5.3 6.0

Balance Pipe question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 29, 2016 | 10:11 AM
  #1  
JigJag's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Veteran Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 1,333
Likes: 583
From: North Carolina
Default Balance Pipe question

I've read posts from several people that have deleted their balance pipe for one reason or another. I've also read that they do little other than ensure a balanced idle even if the throttle bodies are slightly unbalanced.

I've noted that the two intake manifolds on my 5.3L are perfectly balanced vacuum-wise. While my TBs are as in-balance as I can get them, I would still expect a slight variation side to side without the balance pipe; particularly if, like my engine, there is any irregular firing. But vacuum drops and rises again in perfect unison in both manifolds when a miss on bank B occurs. This leads me to believe that, as expected, this large diameter tube is freely carrying any pressure variation between the two plenums.

Here's my question:

If these two plenums are so well connected, then isn't an "A bank" cylinder that is on the intake stroke really breathing through both throttle bodies? If so, at high CFM flow rates does the balance pipe effectively cause the two plenums to act as one with dual TBs?

Obviously that far TB is fairly restricted by the balance pipe diameter and shape.

Very curious.
 
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2016 | 02:17 AM
  #2  
Greg in France's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 14,551
Likes: 10,737
From: France
Default

I think, but do not know, that the intake strokes are so close to each other on a V12 at anything above 1500 rpm that there is no time for the airmass to move between the two intake manifolds down such a small pipe, so any doubling effect on the plenums seems a bit unlikely.
The balance pipe ensures the ECU sees an average vacuum signal, that the engine cold start system and tickover can be controlled at one point and also that the brake servo (on non ABS cars) has vacuum available from both engine banks, which Grant told us is a requirement in some markets.
Greg
 
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2016 | 04:57 AM
  #3  
Grant Francis's Avatar
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 28,773
Likes: 11,260
From: Adelaide Stralia
Default

My write up on AAV removal years ago, This includes the removal of that balance pipe.

AAV Removal write up.pdf
 
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2016 | 10:25 AM
  #4  
JigJag's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Veteran Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 1,333
Likes: 583
From: North Carolina
Default

Thanks Dave and Grant.

I agree Dave, there's far too much restriction for there to be any significant air transferred through the balance pipe. Airstream would be limited by the speed of sound and the air in the tube would become a piston oscillating back and forth. But that oscillation would allow some additional intake as it reduces vacuum for the plenum breathing in.

The reason I asked is because I'm considering a mod to increase the volume of the plenums and I'm running mental simulations since I don't have software for it. Hard to type it all up so here's a visual aid.





Balance pipe / plenum mod concept.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Boo
S-Type / S type R Supercharged V8 ( X200 )
18
Sep 16, 2016 04:11 PM
pokaroo2
XF and XFR ( X250 )
3
Sep 8, 2016 12:19 AM
rjh
XJ XJ6 / XJ8 / XJR ( X350 & X358 )
4
Sep 6, 2016 02:19 PM
Brandon Wright
XJ XJ6 / XJR6 ( X300 )
2
Sep 1, 2016 04:38 AM
lossking_
XK8 / XKR ( X100 )
3
Aug 31, 2016 11:21 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:12 AM.