HE v12 versus pre HE
#1
Guest
Posts: n/a
HE v12 versus pre HE
I am very interested in getting into a Jaguar XJS, and then putting some time and work into the engine. I have read that the HE engines from 81 on are not the best platforms for building a powerful engine with, as the exhaust valve is recessed and and smaller to increase fuel efficiency.
As it looks, I think the only XJS's that would be feasible for me to get are the late 80s early 90s ones.
My question is, since the primary difference between the HE and non HE engines is the recessed valve, would it be possible to simply swap the head from an older engine, to effectively get a pre-he v12?
Thank you
Matt
As it looks, I think the only XJS's that would be feasible for me to get are the late 80s early 90s ones.
My question is, since the primary difference between the HE and non HE engines is the recessed valve, would it be possible to simply swap the head from an older engine, to effectively get a pre-he v12?
Thank you
Matt
#2
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest USA
Posts: 24,743
Received 10,757 Likes
on
7,101 Posts
#3
In short you are right you’ll need to use early pistons with the early head. Or go for custom pistons.
The first batch of engines had the word Jaguar cast into the valve cover. Later ones had a decal over the flat spot where Jaguar was cast. Those first ones had 9.0-1 compression no matter where they went. The ones with decals were 7.8-1 if shipped to America and 9.0-1 for the rest of the world.
From mid 1980 to mid 1981 English bound engines had 10.0-1 compression.
If you are going all out racing Cosworth builds a light forged piston worth additional horsepower over the factory pistons. While many people will sell you alternatives you’ll need to be very careful about specing them out.
#4
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Austin tx and Daytona FL.
Posts: 7,362
Received 1,231 Likes
on
939 Posts
11.5 cosworth piston forged!
pic of the 11.5 to1 comp. ratio forged piston for PreHE by Cosworth UK, cost donno!
pic shows it looks convex but thats camra angle, it is actually a flat top piston , the small bowl in middle is just below the sparkplug, i suppose to keep pressure in the middle so as to not tilt the piston and increase drag friction,(a lot of engineering in that piston)!
ron
The following users liked this post:
Mguar (09-29-2019)
#5
11.5 cosworth piston forged!
pic of the 11.5 to1 comp. ratio forged piston for PreHE by Cosworth UK, cost donno!
pic shows it looks convex but thats camra angle, it is actually a flat top piston , the small bowl in middle is just below the sparkplug, i suppose to keep pressure in the middle so as to not tilt the piston and increase drag friction,(a lot of engineering in that piston)!
ron
#6
I am very interested in getting into a Jaguar XJS, and then putting some time and work into the engine. I have read that the HE engines from 81 on are not the best platforms for building a powerful engine with, as the exhaust valve is recessed and and smaller to increase fuel efficiency.
As it looks, I think the only XJS's that would be feasible for me to get are the late 80s early 90s ones.
My question is, since the primary difference between the HE and non HE engines is the recessed valve, would it be possible to simply swap the head from an older engine, to effectively get a pre-he v12?
Thank you
Matt
As it looks, I think the only XJS's that would be feasible for me to get are the late 80s early 90s ones.
My question is, since the primary difference between the HE and non HE engines is the recessed valve, would it be possible to simply swap the head from an older engine, to effectively get a pre-he v12?
Thank you
Matt
The HE head was designed first to meet California upcoming smog laws and 2nd to improve fuel efficiency. There was nothing to improve power.
It improved mileage for a tiny bit but the other improvements made at the same time did most of the fuel mileage improvements. Going from either a 3:30 or 3:07 final drive to a 2:88 helped the most.
Plus the slightly earlier switch from the Borg Warner to theGM Turbo 400 transmission got almost the rest of the way.
improvements to the fuel injection brought it the last bit.
Fuel injection for the HE is on the edge of too lean if used in the earlier Flathead. It was set for the stratified charge used in the HE and will normally lead to burned valves if used on the Flathead unless the mixture is adjusted to the rich side.
Racing the HE’s unless mixture is dealt with will lead to blown head gaskets, and likely burned valves.
One final point. British and continental cars got decent compression 9.0-1 except the last year of the Flathead which went to 10.0-1
Most American engines were 7.8-1 pistons with a tiny handful of the earliest V12’s the exception. Those will be recognized by Jaguar cast into the valve covers rather than the decal that says Jaguar. Those are 9.0-1
Last edited by Mguar; 10-21-2019 at 11:51 AM.
#7
Trending Topics
#8
I’d assume the same as England 9.0-1 with 289 hp. The last iteration of the “Flathead” was 1980 with 10.0-1 compression and 299 horsepower. ( one year only)
#9
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest USA
Posts: 24,743
Received 10,757 Likes
on
7,101 Posts
I think I found and posted the VIN breaks for the cars having this little-known and desirable engine. I recall that production actually ran less than one full year, from mid-1980 into spring of 1981. I'll try to verify that and/or find the info
Cheers
DD
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)