New to Jags - Here are the issues!
#1
New to Jags - Here are the issues!
I am new to this forum and new to Jags in general. Just picked up a 1993 XJS 4.0 convertible (about a month ago) and am slowly sorting out the issues.
There are a few I am having a hard time searching for because they are hard to describe and get results, so I am hoping that is where the forums come in!
If anyone has any suggestions or similar experiences, any help would be greatly appreciated.
Brakes:
1) when I first press the brake pedal after driving for a while, it feels like there is a "gap" before the pedal connects to the brake system (maybe a 1/2" of travel). Subsequent presses feel normal, then after a few minutes of driving the first press has that gap again.
2) more recently, after driving for a while and then stopping and holding the brakes (like at a red light) occasionally the pedal will stick. When I let up, the pedal does not and the brakes remain engaged until I touch the gas (or tap the brake again) and I can feel the brakes release and the pedal pops up.
Suspension and steering:
1) at highway speeds (70+) I get a bit of a shake and if I let go of the wheel I can see it moving back and forth. Car drives straight, no pull, and just had new tires on, balancing, and alignment.
- my plan of attack is steering rack bushings, then control arm bushing, then wheel hubs. Any other suggestions?
2) anyone know what replacement springs to use? I did the front shocks because they were shot and the rears are pretty bad, but I'd like to do those with new springs. 1993 XJS Conv 4.0 (not 1993.5).
I am also enjoying issues with a hot start problem, inaccurate fuel reading, relays that stop working when hot, etc. Usual Jag stuff, but info on all that is readily available and easy to search.
Again, any insight is always appreciated!
There are a few I am having a hard time searching for because they are hard to describe and get results, so I am hoping that is where the forums come in!
If anyone has any suggestions or similar experiences, any help would be greatly appreciated.
Brakes:
1) when I first press the brake pedal after driving for a while, it feels like there is a "gap" before the pedal connects to the brake system (maybe a 1/2" of travel). Subsequent presses feel normal, then after a few minutes of driving the first press has that gap again.
2) more recently, after driving for a while and then stopping and holding the brakes (like at a red light) occasionally the pedal will stick. When I let up, the pedal does not and the brakes remain engaged until I touch the gas (or tap the brake again) and I can feel the brakes release and the pedal pops up.
Suspension and steering:
1) at highway speeds (70+) I get a bit of a shake and if I let go of the wheel I can see it moving back and forth. Car drives straight, no pull, and just had new tires on, balancing, and alignment.
- my plan of attack is steering rack bushings, then control arm bushing, then wheel hubs. Any other suggestions?
2) anyone know what replacement springs to use? I did the front shocks because they were shot and the rears are pretty bad, but I'd like to do those with new springs. 1993 XJS Conv 4.0 (not 1993.5).
I am also enjoying issues with a hot start problem, inaccurate fuel reading, relays that stop working when hot, etc. Usual Jag stuff, but info on all that is readily available and easy to search.
Again, any insight is always appreciated!
#2
I have steering wheel jutter just like you at those speeds, question is does hard acceleration even it out? That will narrow it down.
I'm just doing ALL front bushings/subframe and eng mounts in polyurethane to cure it, I chose to do so after seeing another post here similar issue turned out to be the subframe mounts, was it Daim? I remember the pics but not who posted - might be worth jacking the car up and inspecting every mount/bushing?
I'm just doing ALL front bushings/subframe and eng mounts in polyurethane to cure it, I chose to do so after seeing another post here similar issue turned out to be the subframe mounts, was it Daim? I remember the pics but not who posted - might be worth jacking the car up and inspecting every mount/bushing?
Last edited by VancouverXJ6; 09-15-2018 at 12:33 PM.
#3
Hi and welcome to the forum.
Brakes - I would suspect sticking pistons. If I was you I would pull the calipers off and rebuild/replace with changeover units, flush the brake fluid and replace it.
Steering shake, Greg has this problem and is in process of replacing subframe mounts to see if this cures it. The XJS front suspension and rack are fixed to the subframe so if the mounts are bad then you can get steering issues. I would replace rack bushes with Poly and depending on how you want the to handle rubber in everything else. If you put Poly in the suspension it will significantly improve steering response but at the expense of NVH.
Brakes - I would suspect sticking pistons. If I was you I would pull the calipers off and rebuild/replace with changeover units, flush the brake fluid and replace it.
Steering shake, Greg has this problem and is in process of replacing subframe mounts to see if this cures it. The XJS front suspension and rack are fixed to the subframe so if the mounts are bad then you can get steering issues. I would replace rack bushes with Poly and depending on how you want the to handle rubber in everything else. If you put Poly in the suspension it will significantly improve steering response but at the expense of NVH.
#4
Steering wheel shimmy
Hi and welcome to the forum.
Steering shake, Greg has this problem and is in process of replacing subframe mounts to see if this cures it. The XJS front suspension and rack are fixed to the subframe so if the mounts are bad then you can get steering issues. I would replace rack bushes with Poly and depending on how you want the to handle rubber in everything else. If you put Poly in the suspension it will significantly improve steering response but at the expense of NVH.
Steering shake, Greg has this problem and is in process of replacing subframe mounts to see if this cures it. The XJS front suspension and rack are fixed to the subframe so if the mounts are bad then you can get steering issues. I would replace rack bushes with Poly and depending on how you want the to handle rubber in everything else. If you put Poly in the suspension it will significantly improve steering response but at the expense of NVH.
Most recently I have beefed up the six shots by filling the holes with acrylic glue-like stuff called Stixall, which is very durable and does not set 100% solid. This has cured the problem at 80kph, but has produced a tiny, repeat tiny, touch at about 95pkh. Just a touch mind, nothing I would probably concern myself with if I was not sensitised to it.
I have a hot country spec 3 row radiator and dual SPAL fans, all of which are mounted (in effect) on the front crossmember, which is about 18 inches in front of the axle line. I have a idea that this extra weight (as OEM it is a two-row rad, and the main fan is on the engine) has something to do with the inability of the six shots to control the oscillation. I am in the process of reducing the weight of this by (I hope) around 20 kilos, and will post with my findings.
But based on what I have so far, faced with a persistent shimmy at a certain speed range, and with no catastrophic wear present on the other components (rack bushes, wishbone bushes, bearings, subframe mounts) I would replace the front 6 shots with poly ones - which (eg) Manners sell for a bit less than OEM ones - as a first step. I have certainly proved in my case (by my beefing up the OEM ones) that too compliant six shot bushes, has been a major cause of my shimmy, and making them more solid has gone almost all the way to eliminate the problem. I suspect poly ones, rather than hone-made harder ones, would have done it completely.
More when my weight reduction tests are done.
The following users liked this post:
orangeblossom (09-16-2018)
#5
I would think everything you're doing to eliminate the shimmy is actually just masking an issue that is there. Have you checked your front wheel bearings for excessive play?. Swapped your rear wheels to the front, to suspect wheel out of round or bent slightly? Wheel/tire balance?
Beefing up the mounts are all good but may just be a way to isolate what may still be there.
Beefing up the mounts are all good but may just be a way to isolate what may still be there.
#6
I would think everything you're doing to eliminate the shimmy is actually just masking an issue that is there. Have you checked your front wheel bearings for excessive play?. Swapped your rear wheels to the front, to suspect wheel out of round or bent slightly? Wheel/tire balance?
Beefing up the mounts are all good but may just be a way to isolate what may still be there.
Beefing up the mounts are all good but may just be a way to isolate what may still be there.
I do follow your point about symptoms and causes though, which is why I mentioned the weight reduction. It remains true, however, an undamped oscillation at a given speed being allowed by the six shots (obviously in combination with other forces and movements allowed by the rubber components in the subframe/suspension system) is an underlying cause. Thus altering the spring rate of the system to eliminate it, is not just masking the problem, but eliminating it.
#7
Trending Topics
#8
Steve
The front subframe (including therefore steering suspension, hubs and wheels, also taking the weight of the engine) is held to the body at four points, two at the rear and two at the front. The rear two called "V mounts" (2 below) take all the weight and are in compression. The front two are round rubber bushes with holes right through them, and look rather like a revolver's chamber. See 10 on the diagram
These do not take much weight but locate the subframe; fore and aft, mainly.
My problem is/was/seems to be, caused by these being too soft, although brand new OEM metalastics, and somehow allowing the subframe/body to move relative to one another (vibrate or oscillate) in a way that produced steering shimmy, at a certain speed only. I can only think the subframe somehow moved up one side and down the other (in effect rocking slightly side to side) in an unintended way. It might also be aggravated by a heavier radiator and fan package than OEM. But this problem appeared a few of years ago, very slightly, and got a great deal more noticeable a few months ago, hence my quest to track it down.
Making the bushes less compliant, by filling the holes, has had a huge effect - but sadly and expensively only after renewing everything else! Nobody thought the six shots could be a problem, including me. I reckon poly ones will fix it permanently, but I also wish to reduce the weight in that area ahead of the front axle line; as I am pretty sure I am getting some sort of unintended harmonic effect, and reducing weight will change it. We are talking some sort of sympathetic resonance-type effect, I am pretty sure, which a smallish weight change may well cure, by altering the frequency to eliminate the effect.
The front subframe (including therefore steering suspension, hubs and wheels, also taking the weight of the engine) is held to the body at four points, two at the rear and two at the front. The rear two called "V mounts" (2 below) take all the weight and are in compression. The front two are round rubber bushes with holes right through them, and look rather like a revolver's chamber. See 10 on the diagram
These do not take much weight but locate the subframe; fore and aft, mainly.
My problem is/was/seems to be, caused by these being too soft, although brand new OEM metalastics, and somehow allowing the subframe/body to move relative to one another (vibrate or oscillate) in a way that produced steering shimmy, at a certain speed only. I can only think the subframe somehow moved up one side and down the other (in effect rocking slightly side to side) in an unintended way. It might also be aggravated by a heavier radiator and fan package than OEM. But this problem appeared a few of years ago, very slightly, and got a great deal more noticeable a few months ago, hence my quest to track it down.
Making the bushes less compliant, by filling the holes, has had a huge effect - but sadly and expensively only after renewing everything else! Nobody thought the six shots could be a problem, including me. I reckon poly ones will fix it permanently, but I also wish to reduce the weight in that area ahead of the front axle line; as I am pretty sure I am getting some sort of unintended harmonic effect, and reducing weight will change it. We are talking some sort of sympathetic resonance-type effect, I am pretty sure, which a smallish weight change may well cure, by altering the frequency to eliminate the effect.
Last edited by Greg in France; 09-16-2018 at 10:58 AM.
#9
Thanks Greg, just unfamiliar with the term.
I have been chasing a squeak for ages that proved very difficult to trace; had the car up on a lift with no weight on the wheels a few times and pry barred everything but no movement anywhere.
Checked all exhaust hangers, everything rotational and replaced the front shock sponge washers all to no avail.
Eventually the local garage had me drive slowly over some bumps with the bonnet up whilst they peered in to the engine bay; the noise was definitely coming from the left front suspension area. (the whole cradle was replaced about 4 years ago with new bushes).
The put it up on the ramp again, this time with the wheels taking the weight of the car, and started trying to tighten things up.
The big bolts (number 16 in the diagram I think) were completely slack so the whole cradle was moving around; there was enough movement to scrape paint off!
After tightening them up the squeak has finally gone away.
Part of the problem over here is that the roads are so bloody awful that any suspension play is masked by the continual bouncing and jarring.
Anyway, I can hear the engine better now!
Aren't poly bushes more rigid than the OEM ones? I would have thought that any vibration would be transmitted even more?
I have been chasing a squeak for ages that proved very difficult to trace; had the car up on a lift with no weight on the wheels a few times and pry barred everything but no movement anywhere.
Checked all exhaust hangers, everything rotational and replaced the front shock sponge washers all to no avail.
Eventually the local garage had me drive slowly over some bumps with the bonnet up whilst they peered in to the engine bay; the noise was definitely coming from the left front suspension area. (the whole cradle was replaced about 4 years ago with new bushes).
The put it up on the ramp again, this time with the wheels taking the weight of the car, and started trying to tighten things up.
The big bolts (number 16 in the diagram I think) were completely slack so the whole cradle was moving around; there was enough movement to scrape paint off!
After tightening them up the squeak has finally gone away.
Part of the problem over here is that the roads are so bloody awful that any suspension play is masked by the continual bouncing and jarring.
Anyway, I can hear the engine better now!
Aren't poly bushes more rigid than the OEM ones? I would have thought that any vibration would be transmitted even more?
#10
Thanks Greg, just unfamiliar with the term.
I have been chasing a squeak for ages that proved very difficult to trace; had the car up on a lift with no weight on the wheels a few times and pry barred everything but no movement anywhere.
Checked all exhaust hangers, everything rotational and replaced the front shock sponge washers all to no avail.
Eventually the local garage had me drive slowly over some bumps with the bonnet up whilst they peered in to the engine bay; the noise was definitely coming from the left front suspension area. (the whole cradle was replaced about 4 years ago with new bushes).
The put it up on the ramp again, this time with the wheels taking the weight of the car, and started trying to tighten things up.
The big bolts (number 16 in the diagram I think) were completely slack so the whole cradle was moving around; there was enough movement to scrape paint off!
After tightening them up the squeak has finally gone away.
Part of the problem over here is that the roads are so bloody awful that any suspension play is masked by the continual bouncing and jarring.
Anyway, I can hear the engine better now!
Aren't poly bushes more rigid than the OEM ones? I would have thought that any vibration would be transmitted even more?
I have been chasing a squeak for ages that proved very difficult to trace; had the car up on a lift with no weight on the wheels a few times and pry barred everything but no movement anywhere.
Checked all exhaust hangers, everything rotational and replaced the front shock sponge washers all to no avail.
Eventually the local garage had me drive slowly over some bumps with the bonnet up whilst they peered in to the engine bay; the noise was definitely coming from the left front suspension area. (the whole cradle was replaced about 4 years ago with new bushes).
The put it up on the ramp again, this time with the wheels taking the weight of the car, and started trying to tighten things up.
The big bolts (number 16 in the diagram I think) were completely slack so the whole cradle was moving around; there was enough movement to scrape paint off!
After tightening them up the squeak has finally gone away.
Part of the problem over here is that the roads are so bloody awful that any suspension play is masked by the continual bouncing and jarring.
Anyway, I can hear the engine better now!
Aren't poly bushes more rigid than the OEM ones? I would have thought that any vibration would be transmitted even more?
I expect having fitted the six shots, and tightened up the clamp bolts, someone forgot to tighten the big bolts. Very easily done! But isn't it great when at last you track something down?
As to the bush material, It is not a question of rigidity, I believe, but of the natural frequency of the bush, or the bush/subrame/body as combination. Just as the natural frequency of a glass will alter if you half-fill it with water, a less compliant bush (or a more compliant one for that matter) will alter the natural harmonic. In my case this odd harmonic has undoubtedly happened at 80kph, and hardening up the bushes has fixed it. I do not have an NVH problem of unwanted vibration being transmitted through the bush; rather what I have seems to be an unintended "bouncing" of the entire front end of the subframe, which is provoking a reaction in the steering. As I mentioned the "beat" is only 3 or 4 times a second, and it is only at a given speed, regardless of gear, acceleration or any drivetrain effects. So I am driven to the conclusion that it is the subframe/car front end vibrating at its natural frequency. As beefing up the six shots got rid of it at 80kph, I believe this is because the natural frequency of the "system" was disrupted by the change. What I am after now is weight reduction forward of the axle line, which will, or might, or should, have a similar effect in altering this undesirable harmonic.
Anyone who thinks this is unlikely might be right, obviously, but when I removed the mechanical fan, years and years ago, and replaced it (on what turned out to be poor advice) with a 12 inch electric, the turn-in of the car was really noticeably changed; the gyroscopic effect of the fan having been removed being the reason, I surmised. So if I get 20 kilos off the front end I reckon - famous last words obviously - it might well do the trick, particularly as I have a vague idea the problem might have started to show itself, however slightly to start with, when I fitted my 3 row radiator which is a great deal heavier than the normal one.
The following users liked this post:
orangeblossom (09-16-2018)
#11
#12
However, looking back, if I was starting anew, and without a workshop and not so much time as I have now, or giving advice to a new-to-XJS person, I think I would counsel keeping the mechanical.
As far as my steering shimmy problem is concerned, for years I had a large 17 inch Pacet allied to the OEM two-row rad, and it was all brilliant. For some reason I thought a 3 row would be a good plan, and the Pacet gave up and was replaced by a huge SPAL. It could be, could be, the two changes, both of which increased weight well forward of the axle line, have tipped the system into an unintended harmonic. We shall see!
The following users liked this post:
orangeblossom (09-16-2018)
#13
#14
#15
I have certainly proved in my case (by my beefing up the OEM ones) that too compliant six shot bushes, has been a major cause of my shimmy, and making them more solid has gone almost all the way to eliminate the problem. I suspect poly ones, rather than hone-made harder ones, would have done it completely.
More when my weight reduction tests are done.
More when my weight reduction tests are done.
As for your weight issue have you looked into the fiberglass hood replacement? that should shave off quite abit. Carbon canister and smog pump are like 10lb+ each to plus the associated junk, I ripped those off no problem.
The following users liked this post:
Greg in France (09-17-2018)
#16
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jaggernaut3
New Member Area - Intro a MUST
10
05-08-2019 12:06 PM
cat_as_trophy
New Member Area - Intro a MUST
6
11-21-2013 08:36 PM
Alaskamike
New Member Area - Intro a MUST
4
12-02-2012 07:02 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)