XJS ( X27 ) 1975 - 1996 3.6 4.0 5.3 6.0

V12 stalling out

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 05-29-2017, 07:37 AM
Doug's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest USA
Posts: 24,743
Received 10,757 Likes on 7,101 Posts
Default V12 stalling out

My recent 160+ mile shakedown cruise when very well but one problem did crop up.

On three separate occasions the engine died while driving. In each case the situation was identical:

- Hard acceleration (like 75% or more throttle opening) in first gear, then sudden closing of throttle
- Engine dies instantly; no sputtering or 'fading away'. It just flat-out stops as soon as the throttle is released.
- Tachometer drops out instantly
- Engine restarts instantly (just click into "N", turn key, restart, resume driving)
- Engine fully warmed


I'm fairly certain that I have loose wire/connector that is responding to the movement of the engine so my first course of action is inspection and jiggle testing of all relevant wiring.

The die-out is so instantaneous that I really don't feel I have a fuel system issue. But....?

Any additional ideas?

Cheers
DD
 
  #2  
Old 05-29-2017, 07:47 AM
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Adelaide Stralia
Posts: 27,306
Received 10,312 Likes on 6,822 Posts
Default

Bugga.

TPS dropping too far on the sudden closed throttle movement???, not sure it a dead out would happen, but maybe.

Coming from 75% hard accel to zero, would see a huge vac surge "hit" the MAF inside the ECU, maybe enough to stall it out, coz we know Hi vac = less fuel (shorter injector pulse).

Fiddle factor, good move.
 
The following users liked this post:
Doug (05-29-2017)
  #3  
Old 05-29-2017, 08:16 AM
Doug's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest USA
Posts: 24,743
Received 10,757 Likes on 7,101 Posts
Default

Thanks Grant.

Fortunately I have a known-good spare ECU to swap out, if needed.

The TPS is new so I'm less suspicious of that.

Getting back to the ECU.....

Item #1 in this pic is the vacuum canister thingy that is mounted in the vacuum pipe immediately ahead of the ECU.....

https://www.jaguarclassicparts.com/u...pipe-5-3-litre

.....Jaguar calls this a "reservoir".

Hmmm. If it's a reservoir (I thought it was a filter) then I have to wonder if it's there to sort of cushion/buffer the MAP sensor from sudden vacuum changes?

I don't know how to test it. I'll do some experimenting with a hand-held vacuum pump, I guess, and see what happens.

Cheers
DD
 
The following users liked this post:
Greg in France (05-29-2017)
  #4  
Old 05-29-2017, 08:19 AM
Greg in France's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: France
Posts: 13,336
Received 9,089 Likes on 5,352 Posts
Default

Doug
You know the ECU closes the injectors down under these circumstances until the revs fall to below about 1400 rpm. I wonder if the ECU for some reason is not starting them up again? Maybe worth a connector clean all through, including the resistor pack, ECU and injector loom plugs?
If yours is a Lucas car, there is not a lot of relative movement possible between the amp and the coil, but the low tension feed to the coil could be the culprit. The copper does fracture inside the OEM coil connectors.
Greg
 
The following users liked this post:
Doug (05-29-2017)
  #5  
Old 05-29-2017, 08:22 AM
Greg in France's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: France
Posts: 13,336
Received 9,089 Likes on 5,352 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Doug
Thanks Grant.

Fortunately I have a known-good spare ECU to swap out, if needed.

The TPS is new so I'm less suspicious of that.

Getting back to the ECU.....

Item #1 in this pic is the vacuum canister thingy that is mounted in the vacuum pipe immediately ahead of the ECU.....

https://www.jaguarclassicparts.com/u...pipe-5-3-litre

.....Jaguar calls this a "reservoir".

Hmmm. If it's a reservoir (I thought it was a filter) then I have to wonder if it's there to sort of cushion/buffer the MAP sensor from sudden vacuum changes?

I don't know how to test it. I'll do some experimenting with a hand-held vacuum pump, I guess, and see what happens.

Cheers
DD
Doug
Mine ran like a dog with that canister in the line. I say dump it. Mine did not have one originally, but a spare ECU I had came with one and I tried it.
Greg
 
The following users liked this post:
Doug (05-29-2017)
  #6  
Old 05-29-2017, 08:32 AM
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Adelaide Stralia
Posts: 27,306
Received 10,312 Likes on 6,822 Posts
Default

My understanding of that "cannister" was a moisture trap in that vac line, not sure on that one, just what I was told very early in the V12 days.

Others stated it was a pulse damper for the early HE, so I reckon 6CU cars.

Knowing what I know now, it would take some SERIOUS moisture build up in that line all the way from the engine bay to actually get to the ECU.

Blocked/restricted vac pipe under the car I have seen a few times.

Mine had it, it cracked, NLA, went without, no issues with the 16CU, but the 6CU was a tad doggy.

The suggestion from Greg re the EFI shut off and restart is very sound.
 
  #7  
Old 05-29-2017, 08:39 AM
JigJag's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,331
Received 580 Likes on 361 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Greg in France
Doug
Mine ran like a dog with that canister in the line. I say dump it. Mine did not have one originally, but a spare ECU I had came with one and I tried it.
Greg
Interesting supposition. The buffer is tiny, and likely doesn't affect any vacuum changes bigger than a second. Tiny rapid variations, like a misfire, would be suppressed. I'd suspect the canister was leaking if it made any pronounced effect on performance.

But I may temporarily remove mine to see if it alters behavior. I Shouldnt make any assumptions.
 
The following users liked this post:
Doug (05-29-2017)
  #8  
Old 05-29-2017, 08:52 AM
Doug's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest USA
Posts: 24,743
Received 10,757 Likes on 7,101 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Greg in France
Doug
Mine ran like a dog with that canister in the line. I say dump it. Mine did not have one originally, but a spare ECU I had came with one and I tried it.
Greg

Ok, good, if you know the engine runs well *without* the reservoir that simplifies things for me. I can just remove it and see of anything changes.

Might be interesting to cut one open and see what's inside

Cheers
DD
 
  #9  
Old 05-29-2017, 09:05 AM
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Adelaide Stralia
Posts: 27,306
Received 10,312 Likes on 6,822 Posts
Default

Mine crumbled, and it vacant space inside it, nothing at all.
 
The following users liked this post:
Doug (05-29-2017)
  #10  
Old 05-29-2017, 09:06 AM
Doug's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest USA
Posts: 24,743
Received 10,757 Likes on 7,101 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Greg in France
Doug
You know the ECU closes the injectors down under these circumstances until the revs fall to below about 1400 rpm. I wonder if the ECU for some reason is not starting them up again?

Hmmmm. Worth pondering; I hadn't thought of that at all.

Maybe worth a connector clean all through, including the resistor pack, ECU and injector loom plugs?

Hey mister...there are no dirty connections on MY car ! Quelle horreur


If yours is a Lucas car, there is not a lot of relative movement possible between the amp and the coil, but the low tension feed to the coil could be the culprit. The copper does fracture inside the OEM coil connectors.
Greg

Which I'm hoping would be revealed with some jiggle testing.

During the conversion process I repaired/replaced all wiring that showed any visible defect. However.....who knows what lurks beyond what can be seen with the naked eye?

Cheers
DD
 
  #11  
Old 05-29-2017, 09:10 AM
Doug's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest USA
Posts: 24,743
Received 10,757 Likes on 7,101 Posts
Default

Thanks for all the fast and useful replies.

I think my steps will be....

1) Inspect and jiggle test for a possible wiring fault. If no joy.....

2) Remove canister/reservoir. If no joy.....

3) Swap out ECU

Cheers
DD
 
  #12  
Old 05-29-2017, 09:18 AM
Doug's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest USA
Posts: 24,743
Received 10,757 Likes on 7,101 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Greg in France
Doug
You know the ECU closes the injectors down under these circumstances until the revs fall to below about 1400 rpm. I wonder if the ECU for some reason is not starting them up again?

Further to this something just dawned on me.

The 1400 rpm "turning on" of injectors seems abrupt. I wonder if this might be a clue that supports your theory?

Cheers
DD
 
  #13  
Old 05-29-2017, 09:30 AM
Greg in France's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: France
Posts: 13,336
Received 9,089 Likes on 5,352 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Doug
Hey mister...there are no dirty connections on MY car ! Quelle horreur
Forgive your humble servant, O Mighty One!
 
The following 2 users liked this post by Greg in France:
Doug (05-29-2017), Grant Francis (05-29-2017)
  #14  
Old 05-29-2017, 09:44 AM
Doug's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest USA
Posts: 24,743
Received 10,757 Likes on 7,101 Posts
Default

Just a note....

Not to sound maudlin but I can't help being impressed with the amount of support, useful information, and shared knowledge Jag lovers have via discussion boards such as this. Especially XJS owners. Much more so than many other hobby car forums I've been part of.

Consider this thread. In just a few minutes good ideas came rolling in...including things that probably would never have dawned on me. Whenever a problem comes along it seems that I always learn something new from others. I doff my cap.

I am quite sure that, without the internet, far fewer old Jags would be on the road today.

Cheers and thanks to all

DD
 
The following 3 users liked this post by Doug:
Grant Francis (05-29-2017), Greg in France (05-29-2017), v1rok (05-29-2017)
  #15  
Old 05-29-2017, 11:13 AM
Greg in France's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: France
Posts: 13,336
Received 9,089 Likes on 5,352 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Doug
I am quite sure that, without the internet, far fewer old Jags would be on the road today.
Absolutely agree. And in my case it gives me the courage to get stuck in, knowing that such a safety net is in place.
 
  #16  
Old 05-29-2017, 11:26 AM
Mac Allan's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: California
Posts: 1,741
Received 814 Likes on 515 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Doug
Just a note....

Not to sound maudlin but I can't help being impressed with the amount of support, useful information, and shared knowledge Jag lovers have via discussion boards such as this. Especially XJS owners. Much more so than many other hobby car forums I've been part of.
Cheers to that Doug. I've on two different occasions passed on some interesting car purchases because when I went looking for the relevant forums, they were either not DIY friendly or the volume of posts were too small to make the archives valuable.

I can say for certain, if it weren't for all the helpful advice and information of other XJS owners, I would have sold off the XJS at least a dozen years ago.
 
  #17  
Old 05-29-2017, 11:51 AM
Mac Allan's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: California
Posts: 1,741
Received 814 Likes on 515 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Doug
- Tachometer drops out instantly
I believe that is an important clue. Wouldn't that indicated that the electronic ignition system has been shut down? The engine didn't stop rotating, only the signal cut out -- that either the ECU sees a condition to shut it off, or some other fault is cutting it out.

Given that it is repeatable bug, loose connections or bad contacts seem unlikely. Is it a possibility that the ECU isn't getting all right info at the right time? What I mean does the ECU require A,B, and C to make the right decision in a certain circumstance, but in that particular situation it's only getting A and B? I don't have the schematics in front of me, but it might be worth reviewing what are all the key signal inputs to the ECU under your scenario where it fails.

The only other thing I can think of is does that situation cause a vacuum line to collapse?
 
  #18  
Old 05-29-2017, 04:09 PM
warrjon's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Vic Australia
Posts: 4,638
Received 2,576 Likes on 1,712 Posts
Default

Mac is correct if it was loose connections then the problem would most likely not be as repeatable as you mentioned. He has a good point with the Tacho.

To test this theory pull the fuse to the main EFI relay with the engine running, I have never tried this but as the ignition uses separate supply I would not expect the tacho to do drop instantly, worth a try.
 
  #19  
Old 05-30-2017, 06:47 AM
Doug's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest USA
Posts: 24,743
Received 10,757 Likes on 7,101 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mac Allan
I believe that is an important clue.

Right, as it pretty much eliminates a fuel supply problem. If the pump was giving out, or the filter clogged, or a pressure regulator was faulty...something like that....the engine would splutter for a moment of two and the tachometer wouldn't instantly go to zero.

Wouldn't that indicated that the electronic ignition system has been shut down?
Yes, specifically the primary side of the system such as: ignition switch, wires to the "-" and "+" coil posts, wiring to/from the amplifier....something along those lines.


The engine didn't stop rotating, only the signal cut out
More specifically like the key was turned 'off'


-- that either the ECU sees a condition to shut it off, or some other fault is cutting it out.

Since the ECU depends on a trigger signal from the primary side of the ignition system it (the ECU) would shut down simultaneously, yes.


Given that it is repeatable bug, loose connections or bad contacts seem unlikely.


Accelerating hard and then releasing the throttle creates a fair amount of engine movement. I'm envisioning a faulty wire or faulty connection reacting to that movement....shifting a tiny bit each time that movement occurs. Similar to, let's say, a loose connection at the back of your radio that causes the radio to cut out every time you go over railroad tracks or that certain bump near your house.

Is it a possibility that the ECU isn't getting all right info at the right time? What I mean does the ECU require A,B, and C to make the right decision in a certain circumstance, but in that particular situation it's only getting A and B? I don't have the schematics in front of me, but it might be worth reviewing what are all the key signal inputs to the ECU under your scenario where it fails.

Certainly possible, yes. This could shut down the injectors and cause an engine stall.


The only other thing I can think of is does that situation cause a vacuum line to collapse?
Which is possible, especially since the scenario involves a sudden transition from low to high vacuum. The MAP sensor in the ECU operates off a vacuum signal so there's a possible tie in. However, the result of no vacuum to the MAP sensor is a very rich mixture....which would typically cause a spluttering and chugging. Not so sure that it would instantly kill the engine.

Hopefully we'll all know what went wrong in a day or two!

Cheers and thanks for the input

DD
 
  #20  
Old 05-30-2017, 06:54 AM
Doug's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest USA
Posts: 24,743
Received 10,757 Likes on 7,101 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by warrjon
Mac is correct if it was loose connections then the problem would most likely not be as repeatable as you mentioned.
I can envision a poor connection giving a repeatable fault

He has a good point with the Tacho.

To test this theory pull the fuse to the main EFI relay with the engine running, I have never tried this but as the ignition uses separate supply I would not expect the tacho to do drop instantly, worth a try.

Worth a try, yes. And I agree that the tach is not likely to drop out instantly. The tach does not operate off the ECU. However, both the tach and the ECU rely on the primary ignition system to operate.....which is an easy place to begin an investigation

Wish me luck

Cheers
DD
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:42 PM.