XK / XKR ( X150 ) 2006 - 2014

5.0L XKR/XKR-S induction Design

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 2, 2018 | 05:42 PM
  #1  
FrickenJag's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Former Sponsor
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 847
Likes: 185
From: Charlotte
Default 5.0L XKR/XKR-S induction Design

Decided to go ahead and start the process on designing everything for the custom induction.
I figured you guys would like to see what the induction setup looks like from the scan data.
 
Attached Thumbnails 5.0L XKR/XKR-S induction Design-xkrs-induction-inplace.jpg   5.0L XKR/XKR-S induction Design-xkrs-induction-inplace-top.jpg   5.0L XKR/XKR-S induction Design-xkrs-induction-tubes.jpg  
Reply
Old May 2, 2018 | 06:14 PM
  #2  
Cee Jay's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 11,890
Likes: 6,401
From: Kaysville, Utah, US
Default

Wow, that's a lot of weird crap on that thing.
 
Reply
Old May 2, 2018 | 10:03 PM
  #3  
Stuart S's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 10,116
Likes: 7,123
From: Atlanta suburbs
Default

Originally Posted by Cee Jay
Wow, that's a lot of weird crap on that thing.
It's understandable by a gastroenterologist.

(subscribed to thread)
 
Reply
Old May 3, 2018 | 08:04 AM
  #4  
Ranchero50's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 2,936
Likes: 978
From: Hagerstown MD
Default

Originally Posted by Cee Jay
Wow, that's a lot of weird crap on that thing.
Noise cancelling 1/4 wave chambers.
 
Reply
Old May 3, 2018 | 10:11 AM
  #5  
10XKR's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 422
Likes: 232
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by Ranchero50
Noise cancelling 1/4 wave chambers.
One would guess they would have liked to have done one large chamber, but they made the best of the room they had. Sure looks like a LOT of thought went into that, by a bunch of smart engineers.

Dave
 
Reply
Old May 3, 2018 | 11:19 AM
  #6  
Cee Jay's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 11,890
Likes: 6,401
From: Kaysville, Utah, US
Default

The 4.2s had a bunch of blower whine, which isn't necessarily a BAD thing, and the 5.0s don't have any noticeable whine at all, which isn't necessarily a BAD thing......... There should be some servos or something somewhere that block off the chambers when in DYNAMIC MODE, for extra fun noises.
 
Reply
Old May 3, 2018 | 12:00 PM
  #7  
Mandrake's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 463
Likes: 313
From: South Ogden, UT
Default

How's those 5.0L headers coming along?
 
Reply
Old May 3, 2018 | 12:04 PM
  #8  
Mandrake's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 463
Likes: 313
From: South Ogden, UT
Default

Originally Posted by Cee Jay
The 4.2s had a bunch of blower whine, which isn't necessarily a BAD thing, and the 5.0s don't have any noticeable whine at all, which isn't necessarily a BAD thing......... There should be some servos or something somewhere that block off the chambers when in DYNAMIC MODE, for extra fun noises.
Eurotoys upper and lower pulleys = enough whine to make it obvious it's blown, but not so much that it sounds like a drill. There is a servo that adjusts the whine... it's called the throttle body. Lol...
 
Reply
Old May 3, 2018 | 12:37 PM
  #9  
FrickenJag's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Former Sponsor
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 847
Likes: 185
From: Charlotte
Default

Originally Posted by Mandrake
How's those 5.0L headers coming along?
Investing in couple projects at moment, 5.0L highflow cats first, then I'll finish the header. Flanges made, collecters are fabbed, just need to lift and start fabbing. Just have had a lot of other client projects slowing me down.
 
Reply
Old May 3, 2018 | 03:11 PM
  #10  
Queen and Country's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 7,420
Likes: 2,396
From: Hastings
Default

Originally Posted by 10XKR
One would guess they would have liked to have done one large chamber, but they made the best of the room they had. Sure looks like a LOT of thought went into that, by a bunch of smart engineers.
One large chamber would be counterproductive.
Flow destroying resonance and standing waves occurs at different frequencies and at different points in a tube. So you need chambers tuned to specific frequencies at different points. The science is harder than 3dimensional chess to me, in just getting air to flow through a tube, but this tube is attached to an air pump (the engine), and they are using these cylinders on the intake to take pulses out of the engine primarily.
 
Reply
Old May 3, 2018 | 03:23 PM
  #11  
Ranchero50's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 2,936
Likes: 978
From: Hagerstown MD
Default

Originally Posted by 10XKR
One would guess they would have liked to have done one large chamber, but they made the best of the room they had. Sure looks like a LOT of thought went into that, by a bunch of smart engineers.

Dave
Doesn't work that way, different volume / length / diameter to cancel different frequencies and God save you if resonance or harmonics come into play. The small chambers effect higher pitches noises. I'd bet there's more testing and design into Noise / Vibration / Harshness versus any other dynamic on a chassis. Gentlemen want a quiet hot rod and so does the government. Passing the drive by noise levels can be difficult for econoboxes much less grand touring supercars.
 
Reply
Old May 3, 2018 | 03:37 PM
  #12  
10XKR's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 422
Likes: 232
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by Ranchero50
Doesn't work that way, different volume / length / diameter to cancel different frequencies and God save you if resonance or harmonics come into play. The small chambers effect higher pitches noises. I'd bet there's more testing and design into Noise / Vibration / Harshness versus any other dynamic on a chassis. Gentlemen want a quiet hot rod and so does the government. Passing the drive by noise levels can be difficult for econoboxes much less grand touring supercars.
Learn something new everyday, thanks!

Dave
 
Reply
Old May 3, 2018 | 04:17 PM
  #13  
Queen and Country's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 7,420
Likes: 2,396
From: Hastings
Default

Originally Posted by Ranchero50
Gentlemen want a quiet hot rod and so does the government.
This is not for noise control or quietening.
The XKR actually has a contraption for sending more sound to the cabin.
This is to increase the flow into the engine.
 
Reply
Old May 3, 2018 | 09:20 PM
  #14  
Mandrake's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 463
Likes: 313
From: South Ogden, UT
Default

Originally Posted by FrickenJag
Investing in couple projects at moment, 5.0L highflow cats first, then I'll finish the header. Flanges made, collecters are fabbed, just need to lift and start fabbing. Just have had a lot of other client projects slowing me down.
Flanges and collectors are the easy part. Did you ever put a stock manifold on a flow bench to see what you're starting out with? I'm not saying it's gods gift to manifold design, but with tuners getting 600+ HP out of these engines at relatively modest boost pressures and the stock manifolds, I question whether a low-mid four figure set of headers is going to be that much better than a set of extrude honed stockers... especially when you can pick up a spare set to send off for under $200 on eBay.
 
Reply
Old May 23, 2018 | 11:43 AM
  #15  
jwooky's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 83
Likes: 11
Default

Originally Posted by Queen and Country
This is not for noise control or quietening.
The XKR actually has a contraption for sending more sound to the cabin.
This is to increase the flow into the engine.
Disagree. They are absolutely for cancellation of a designated frequency.

For best flow, it would be perfectly smooth.

They likely wanted to pipe in the noise in the cabin after they cleaned it up.
 
Reply
Old May 23, 2018 | 12:09 PM
  #16  
Mandrake's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 463
Likes: 313
From: South Ogden, UT
Default

I think that unless you have a PhD in fluid dynamics, you really aren't in a position to speak in absolute terms regarding intake resonators and their purpose/ function. Quit speculating and posting bs based on 50 year old wives tales.

Me? I'm just a guy that knows how to research and regurgitate. Scroll down to figure 9 if you like pictures instead of words: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/288944484_Computational_analysis_of_air_intake_sys tem_for_internal_combustion_engine_in_presence_of_ acoustic_resonator
 
Reply
Old May 23, 2018 | 12:10 PM
  #17  
Queen and Country's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 7,420
Likes: 2,396
From: Hastings
Default

A smooth tube does not have the best flow- it creates standing waves. look it up.
Sends air in the opposite direction.
Too complex to explain in one post.

The remedy is to have chambers that catch/cache the pulsation.
 
Reply
Old May 23, 2018 | 12:12 PM
  #18  
Queen and Country's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 7,420
Likes: 2,396
From: Hastings
Default

Originally Posted by Mandrake
I think that unless you have a PhD in fluid dynamics, you really aren't in a position to speak in absolute terms regarding intake resonators and their purpose/ function. Quit speculating and posting bs based on 50 year old wives tales.

Me? I'm just a guy that knows how to research and regurgitate. Scroll down to figure 9 if you like pictures instead of words: https://www.researchgate.net/publica...stic_resonator
Same science in acoustic wave propagation. Perhaps even greater complexity.
That article cleared one thing up for me- there is software to help in the design.
In case anyone missed the punchline (as this comes up often):"An intake system with resonator gives a significant improvement of volumetric efficiency at medium and high speed compared to the intake system without resonator. "
 

Last edited by Queen and Country; May 23, 2018 at 12:34 PM. Reason: forgot to add
Reply
Old May 23, 2018 | 12:56 PM
  #19  
jwooky's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 83
Likes: 11
Default

Originally Posted by Mandrake
I think that unless you have a PhD in fluid dynamics, you really aren't in a position to speak in absolute terms regarding intake resonators and their purpose/ function. Quit speculating and posting bs based on 50 year old wives tales.

Me? I'm just a guy that knows how to research and regurgitate. Scroll down to figure 9 if you like pictures instead of words: https://www.researchgate.net/publica...stic_resonator

Maybe I do.
 
Reply
Old May 23, 2018 | 01:08 PM
  #20  
Queen and Country's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 7,420
Likes: 2,396
From: Hastings
Default

Originally Posted by jwooky
Maybe I do.
Hand on heart- I said to myself the joke is on Mandrake because this guy probably teaches Fluid Dynamics at doctorate level or in charge of presidential tweets.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:46 AM.