XK / XKR ( X150 ) 2006 - 2014
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DashLynx

Let's Talk Wheel Gap

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 02-09-2019, 04:48 PM
viper1996's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: CT
Posts: 764
Received 237 Likes on 139 Posts
Default Let's Talk Wheel Gap

Lots of threads on lowering, wheel spacers, springs, etc. I would like to hear the consensus of XK owners that are happy with the "LOOK" of the standard ride height...Ride, camber, rubbing, scraping facia, etc to be excluded in topic. Base your thoughts on looks only! My thoughts are the stock height is to high and degrade the look of the sleek elegant body style...Your thoughts please.
 
  #2  
Old 02-09-2019, 05:12 PM
pwpacp's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Georgia
Posts: 1,335
Received 545 Likes on 364 Posts
Default

I could see mine a bit lower for that sleeker look, however; that would present an issue for my ground clearance which makes it a no-go for me.
 
  #3  
Old 02-09-2019, 05:23 PM
Sean W's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 8,334
Received 4,168 Likes on 2,336 Posts
Default

I'm happy with the OEM design Viper1996. Lower looks great but it's not for me.
 
  #4  
Old 02-09-2019, 05:36 PM
ralphwg's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Los Angeles CA
Posts: 4,891
Received 1,183 Likes on 895 Posts
Default

It is standard height is good for me. would look a little better lower but then ground clearance would be negatively effected.
 
  #5  
Old 02-09-2019, 06:15 PM
09XFSuper's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Charlotte, NC USA
Posts: 434
Received 136 Likes on 93 Posts
Default

OEM ride height on my ‘09 XKR Portfolio is just right in my eyes and I usually lower my cars with Eiback Pro-Kit springs as I consider their Sport Lines too low. I like about 2 finger with clearance between fender lip to tire.



Stock springs
 

Last edited by 09XFSuper; 02-10-2019 at 07:44 AM.
The following users liked this post:
Queen and Country (02-10-2019)
  #6  
Old 02-09-2019, 08:16 PM
u102768's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 2,941
Received 1,484 Likes on 907 Posts
Default

I prefer the wheel arch to neatly frame the wheel. To my eye lowered X150's look odd.
 
  #7  
Old 02-09-2019, 08:24 PM
capitol1's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: claremont, CA
Posts: 72
Received 23 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

My Personal Preference.................. A Lower Profile.
 
  #8  
Old 02-09-2019, 08:30 PM
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 8,638
Received 4,436 Likes on 2,421 Posts
Default

XKR-S springs in mine which are supposedly 10mm lower at the front and 15mm lower at the rear. Looks just about right to me.

Let's Talk Wheel Gap-photo184.jpg
 
The following users liked this post:
Queen and Country (02-10-2019)
  #9  
Old 02-09-2019, 08:32 PM
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 8,638
Received 4,436 Likes on 2,421 Posts
Default

Also

 
  #10  
Old 02-09-2019, 08:38 PM
capitol1's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: claremont, CA
Posts: 72
Received 23 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Your Right! Here's Mine!
 
  #11  
Old 02-09-2019, 09:00 PM
Sean W's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 8,334
Received 4,168 Likes on 2,336 Posts
Default

Here's mine from the dealer before I bought it - stock set up


 
  #12  
Old 02-09-2019, 09:11 PM
Stuart S's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Atlanta suburbs
Posts: 9,161
Received 6,141 Likes on 3,384 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cambo
XKR-S springs in mine which are supposedly 10mm lower at the front and 15mm lower at the rear. Looks just about right to me.

Attachment 217628
By comparison, mine is stock. I don't see much of a difference. And, yes they're both Shadow Grey, just a difference in exposure.

 

Last edited by Stuart S; 02-09-2019 at 09:18 PM.
  #13  
Old 02-10-2019, 12:17 AM
Queen and Country's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Hastings
Posts: 7,420
Received 2,380 Likes on 1,607 Posts
Default

This car is not designed like a BMW M3.
Its a throwback to the etype, and they have mimicked the massive 'in-set' the front wheels had on the Etype.
No way will you ever fix that and keep the steering geometry.
BTW the Etype had no gap.











Slammed but front fender is a mile away

 

Last edited by Queen and Country; 02-10-2019 at 12:23 AM.
The following users liked this post:
guy (02-10-2019)
  #14  
Old 02-10-2019, 01:51 AM
peterv8's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Södra Sandby, Sweden
Posts: 988
Received 375 Likes on 248 Posts
Default


Adamesh springs!:-)
 
  #15  
Old 02-10-2019, 03:40 AM
MarkyUK's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Somerset UK
Posts: 1,628
Received 666 Likes on 451 Posts
Default

Thanks to the bodykit on mine it already sits lower, in the case of my 2014 a garage that services a friends 2010 XKR can't get mine up on their lifts because it is too low, approx 20mm lower

Will try to take a better picture, imo it's too low as keep catching the lip spoiler on curbs etc




 
The following users liked this post:
guy (02-10-2019)
  #16  
Old 02-10-2019, 10:40 AM
viper1996's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: CT
Posts: 764
Received 237 Likes on 139 Posts
Default

I have the H&Rs on mine and it sits a little to low to me...I have 15 mm spacers all the way around. I think the Amadesh or Spires at 25mm look the best to me. opinions? H&Rs 33mm
 

Last edited by viper1996; 02-10-2019 at 10:46 AM.
  #17  
Old 02-10-2019, 10:43 AM
viper1996's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: CT
Posts: 764
Received 237 Likes on 139 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by peterv8

Adamesh springs!:-)
Are you using spacers as well?
 
  #18  
Old 02-10-2019, 10:50 AM
RobGardnerBlack's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Wilton CA
Posts: 209
Received 22 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MarkyUK
Thanks to the bodykit on mine it already sits lower, in the case of my 2014 a garage that services a friends 2010 XKR can't get mine up on their lifts because it is too low, approx 20mm lower

Will try to take a better picture, imo it's too low as keep catching the lip spoiler on curbs et
Same problem here, the 2014 is just that bit lower due to the styling and makes for more issues driving it; sat beside the older XKR it does not appear lower but I have not gotten the spirit level out to check,

 
  #19  
Old 02-10-2019, 11:05 AM
peterv8's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Södra Sandby, Sweden
Posts: 988
Received 375 Likes on 248 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by viper1996
Are you using spacers as well?
Yes, 20mm front 15mm rear

Originally Posted by RobGardnerBlack
Same problem here, the 2014 is just that bit lower due to the styling and makes for more issues driving it; sat beside the older XKR it does not appear lower but I have not gotten the spirit level out to check,
YOU HAVE 2 XKR's!?
Nice!
 
  #20  
Old 02-10-2019, 01:46 PM
Old Radar's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 85
Received 76 Likes on 40 Posts
Default

I really appreciate the aesthetics of the nearly perfect concentric circles formed by the rim, tire, tire gap and wheel well rim. Lowering skews the gap and cancels the entire aesthetic effect. Besides, if I lowered it, I would risk a daily threat from the ridge in my driveway!




Of course, many will have different opinions of the aesthetics of the XK--especially the XKR-S owners--but then, their preferences lean more to the aggressive sport look than simple classic lines--otherwise they would have bought an XK (and if I leaned that way, I would own an XKR-S). In fact, I normally have difficulty picking out the lines of the XK when looking at an XKR-S.

Beyond the need to tinker, the more I read these type of threads, (lowering, larger rims, HP increases, body mods, etc.) the more I sense a certain desire to have the car seem more aggressive--to move it across the scale from XK to XKR or from XKR to XKR-S. You'll notice I said "across the scale" versus "up the scale" because, to me, the latter would imply a sense of increasing desirability that I, personally, do not feel. There is certainly nothing wrong with striving for something more/different/better/shinier than what you currently have, but at least for me and cars, I've always taken the route of finding something I truly enjoy looking at and driving the way it was designed versus trying to change it into something it wasn't.

I've owned my Toyota Supra Turbo for 30 years because it was exactly the car I wanted back in 1989. Up until a couple of years ago it was completely stock. Only when parts became virtually impossible to obtain did I do a few mods. For example, no one, and I mean no one, makes electronically adjustable shocks that work with the Toyota Electronic Modulated Suspension (TEMS), so I was forced to find an alternate solution--which turned out to be manually adjustable coil-overs. Did they lower the car? Yes. Did lowering look better? Maybe. Would I have considered lowering if I could have found TEMS-compatible shocks? Not for a second.



So, to bring this back to XKs,
If you love to tinker, then tinker.
If you would love for your XK to be/look/perform like something else, change it.
If you love your XK the way it was designed, relax and enjoy it.
 
The following users liked this post:
pwpacp (02-10-2019)


Quick Reply: Let's Talk Wheel Gap



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:25 AM.