XK8 / XKR ( X100 ) 1996 - 2006
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2002 xkr question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 02-28-2016, 05:59 PM
legog's Avatar
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Kelowna BC
Posts: 29
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default 2002 xkr question

Question for you x100 experts. I am looking at a 2002 xkr for sale. Seller says it has the 4.2 engine, but I understood those didn't come in until 2003. (He is in a different city so trying to sort this out before going over to see it.) So...could he be right? We're in Canada if that helps. Thanks.
 
  #2  
Old 02-28-2016, 06:39 PM
brgjag's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: SW OH
Posts: 2,904
Received 364 Likes on 327 Posts
Default

as far as I know 4.2 started in 2003!
 
The following users liked this post:
legog (02-28-2016)
  #3  
Old 02-28-2016, 11:16 PM
avos's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,615
Received 1,063 Likes on 759 Posts
Default

4.2 engine started with the 2003 Model Year, and these started being build from September 2002, so it could be true.
 
The following users liked this post:
legog (02-28-2016)
  #4  
Old 02-29-2016, 02:07 AM
woox4's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand
Posts: 552
Received 227 Likes on 169 Posts
Default

If you ask for the VIN number and go to https://topix.jaguar.jlrext.com/topi...cle/lookupForm and look it up it will tell you the engine type fitted.
 
The following users liked this post:
legog (02-29-2016)
  #5  
Old 02-29-2016, 02:40 PM
Ragsdale's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: California
Posts: 33
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

I've seen that mistake in listings on occasion. Model Year 2002 had the 4.0 with a mercedes transmission. 2003 started the 4.2 with, I think, a zf transmission.

Could be an honest mistake.

On a side note, the 20-30 extra horsepower from the 4.2 is a lot more meaningful for the XK8 performance metrics than for the XKR. Somehow, at least from what I've seen, the XKR had about the same performance with 4.0 v. 4.2.

One thing I really like about the 4.2 is the throwback to the 60's e-type, which also had a 4.2 engine.

Similarly, there wasn't much of a performance enhancement back in the 60s when Jaguar increased the e-type to a 4.2.
 
The following users liked this post:
legog (02-29-2016)
  #6  
Old 02-29-2016, 02:47 PM
brgjag's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: SW OH
Posts: 2,904
Received 364 Likes on 327 Posts
Default

Unless I am misreading this the 4.0 to the 4.2 in the XK8 (not XKR) is only 4 more HP. 20-30 more HP is incorrect.



Originally Posted by Ragsdale
I've seen that mistake in listings on occasion. Model Year 2002 had the 4.0 with a mercedes transmission. 2003 started the 4.2 with, I think, a zf transmission.

Could be an honest mistake.

On a side note, the 20-30 extra horsepower from the 4.2 is a lot more meaningful for the XK8 performance metrics than for the XKR. Somehow, at least from what I've seen, the XKR had about the same performance with 4.0 v. 4.2.

One thing I really like about the 4.2 is the throwback to the 60's e-type, which also had a 4.2 engine.

Similarly, there wasn't much of a performance enhancement back in the 60s when Jaguar increased the e-type to a 4.2.
 
  #7  
Old 02-29-2016, 02:49 PM
legog's Avatar
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Kelowna BC
Posts: 29
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ragsdale
I've seen that mistake in listings on occasion. Model Year 2002 had the 4.0 with a mercedes transmission. 2003 started the 4.2 with, I think, a zf transmission.

Could be an honest mistake.

On a side note, the 20-30 extra horsepower from the 4.2 is a lot more meaningful for the XK8 performance metrics than for the XKR. Somehow, at least from what I've seen, the XKR had about the same performance with 4.0 v. 4.2.

One thing I really like about the 4.2 is the throwback to the 60's e-type, which also had a 4.2 engine.

Similarly, there wasn't much of a performance enhancement back in the 60s when Jaguar increased the e-type to a 4.2.

Thanks...yeah I notice that the pictures show the "2, 3, 4" down the left side of the J-gate rather than "2, 3, 4, 5", which I think seals it as well.
 
  #8  
Old 03-04-2016, 03:21 AM
tassiejag's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: NW coast Tasmania
Posts: 38
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

The MY03 commenced production in 2002. I have a XKR Coupe built in September 2002 sold as a 2003 model in Australia in 2003. It has the 4.2 engine and the ZF 6HP26 6 speed auto. So, the seller could be right. As woox4 says, easy to check if you have the VIN.
 
The following users liked this post:
legog (03-05-2016)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mitcharon
XJ XJ8 / XJR ( X308 )
3
02-24-2016 05:52 AM
tommac
XK8 / XKR ( X100 )
13
02-17-2016 06:00 PM
stingray71
XK8 / XKR ( X100 )
9
02-09-2016 10:17 AM
stingray71
XK8 / XKR ( X100 )
2
01-31-2016 05:04 AM
Larry Louton
PRIVATE For Sale / Trade or Buy Classifieds
0
01-29-2016 08:32 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: 2002 xkr question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:24 PM.