XK8 / XKR ( X100 ) 1996 - 2006
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Coupe XKR weight distribution

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-03-2016, 02:00 AM
User 070620's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,462
Received 301 Likes on 148 Posts
Default Coupe XKR weight distribution

any of you know the exact percentage of weight distribution between front and rear axles of the XKR 4.2 Coupe x100?

Many thanks
 
  #2  
Old 03-03-2016, 02:38 AM
GGG's Avatar
GGG
GGG is online now
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Durham, UK
Posts: 120,406
Received 16,766 Likes on 12,154 Posts
Default

Axle weights from the Vehicle Care Handbook for your MY:

Coupe XKR weight distribution-weights.jpg
(click on the image to enlarge it)

Graham
 
The following users liked this post:
User 070620 (03-03-2016)
  #3  
Old 03-03-2016, 05:36 AM
User 070620's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,462
Received 301 Likes on 148 Posts
Default

52% front
48% rear

thank my friend Graham
 
  #4  
Old 03-03-2016, 10:00 AM
scardini1's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Gainesville, VA
Posts: 1,245
Received 334 Likes on 221 Posts
Default

Isn't that curious: The Coupe is significantly lighter than the Convertible. The extra bracing and hydraulics weigh that much more than the roof and that huge rear window? How interesting. I like my coupe even more now!
 
The following users liked this post:
User 070620 (03-04-2016)
  #5  
Old 03-03-2016, 12:08 PM
Ungn's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Southlake, TX
Posts: 1,177
Received 375 Likes on 309 Posts
Default

If XKR's are 52/48, XK8 Coupes must be closer to 50/50, right?


My '97 owners book doesn't have such detailed info.
 
  #6  
Old 03-03-2016, 01:57 PM
Johnken's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: New Jersey USA
Posts: 5,458
Received 1,808 Likes on 1,115 Posts
Default

Isn't this listed on the sticker on your driver's door jam? It is on my 1998 XK8. Right about the manufacture date as I recall.

John
 
  #7  
Old 03-03-2016, 03:33 PM
Ungn's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Southlake, TX
Posts: 1,177
Received 375 Likes on 309 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Johnken
Isn't this listed on the sticker on your driver's door jam? It is on my 1998 XK8. Right about the manufacture date as I recall.

John
I think that is GVW and not empty weights.
 
  #8  
Old 03-03-2016, 03:39 PM
brgjag's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: SW OH
Posts: 2,904
Received 364 Likes on 327 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by scardini1
Isn't that curious: The Coupe is significantly lighter than the Convertible. The extra bracing and hydraulics weigh that much more than the roof and that huge rear window? How interesting. I like my coupe even more now!

I thought most all Converts were lighter then the h/t versions of the same car.
 
  #9  
Old 03-03-2016, 07:54 PM
Ungn's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Southlake, TX
Posts: 1,177
Received 375 Likes on 309 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by brgjag
I thought most all Converts were lighter then the h/t versions of the same car.
Nope. From Car and Driver:



Wind Damage
 
The following users liked this post:
User 070620 (03-04-2016)
  #10  
Old 03-03-2016, 08:22 PM
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Wise County,TX
Posts: 11,877
Received 7,862 Likes on 4,752 Posts
Default

Coupes are also generally more RIGID.
I remember driving my buddies 'E'Type OTS and how LOOSE it felt cornering compared to my 1966 'E'Type Coupe.

Jaguar also claimed better aerodynamics for the 'E'Type Coupe.

I don't know about the aerodynamics for the XK8/R.

bob gauff
 
The following users liked this post:
User 070620 (03-04-2016)
  #11  
Old 03-03-2016, 10:33 PM
Ungn's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Southlake, TX
Posts: 1,177
Received 375 Likes on 309 Posts
Default

All Very true, Bob.

The funny thing about convertibles is the weight distribution for traction improves with the top down vs. top up.

Back in the 1990's I used to race my mustang convertible at the 1/8 mile track with the top down because the 60ft times were consistently .1 seconds faster with street tires while the added Aero drag of the top down didn't show up on the time slip @ 80mph

In a 1/4 mile, top down would definitely hurt mph, but by the 1990's most 1/4 mile track didn't allow top down with out a rollbar/4 point harness, anyway.
 
  #12  
Old 03-04-2016, 03:39 AM
GGG's Avatar
GGG
GGG is online now
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Durham, UK
Posts: 120,406
Received 16,766 Likes on 12,154 Posts
Default

As engineering a Convertible from a Coupe design always requires considerable stiffening (and consequently additional weight), several of the 'prestige' vehicle manufacturers now begin with a Convertible design concept and then create the Coupe version from that.

I recall reading about Jaguar taking this approach with the X150 and Bentley with the Continental GT.

Graham
 
The following users liked this post:
User 070620 (03-04-2016)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mhamilton
XJ XJ6 / XJ8 / XJR ( X350 & X358 )
24
06-15-2017 03:51 PM
LedZepplin
XK8 / XKR ( X100 )
1
02-21-2016 07:28 AM
Kopi
XJ XJ6 / XJR6 ( X300 )
7
02-19-2016 08:41 AM
tommac
XK8 / XKR ( X100 )
13
02-17-2016 06:00 PM
nasomi
XK / XKR ( X150 )
14
02-16-2016 10:35 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: Coupe XKR weight distribution



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:59 PM.