XK8 / XKR ( X100 ) 1996 - 2006

4.0, 4.2 and Aston Martin Compatability Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 20, 2015 | 11:12 PM
  #1  
XxSlowpokexX's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,245
Likes: 174
From: NYC
Default 4.0, 4.2 and Aston Martin Compatability Question

Questions


1) Are the 4.2 and 4.0 xkr exhaust manifolds interchangeable? Basically would the factory exhaust bolt onto the 4.2 manifolds?
2) What year Aston Martin intake manifolds (naturally aspirated) works on a 4.2 head if any?
3) As far as swapping in a 4.2 engine. I have a complete one out of an xkr to swap into my 02 xkr. Im missing only accessories. Will I need to change timing cover?...Balancer etc?? I read the post on the swap but it really didn't deal with an xkr engine for an xkr engine.


Thanks all!


Damon
 
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2015 | 09:49 AM
  #2  
P700Dee's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 80
Likes: 20
From: Ashford UK
Default

I think the manifolds are the same for a 4.0 and 4.2. Can't comment on the Aston stuff would be suprised if they were compatible. re the 4.2 swap into a 4.0 car it can be done. Easiest is just to swap all the ancillaries and electronics from your 4.0 onto the 4.2 lump, including the Mercedes 5 speed box. There are differences in the sensors between different generations of the V8 engines, the new block will work fine with the old sensors and electronics, the new engine and sensors can have issues with the old electronics. I would be surprised if there was not a thread here if you search for it. The changes have been done many times in the UK
 
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2015 | 06:05 PM
  #3  
XxSlowpokexX's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,245
Likes: 174
From: NYC
Default

I have a complete 4.2 xkr engine. I wanted to ceramic coat the exhaust manifolds from my 4.2 then swap out onto my 4.0 but wanted to make sure they were the same. The Aston martin N/A intake is a different story for another project but also for a later model 4.2. If it works on the 4.0 heads ill just have to swap heads out I just am not sure
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2018 | 08:50 AM
  #4  
phatcat67's Avatar
Member
10 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 68
Likes: 40
From: Castle Rock, CO.
Default

Well, I am trying the Aston Martin intake thing right now. Here is what I have discovered:

Intake manifold gaskets are same as 4.2L that is about as far as it gets. Nothing else is compatible! I have been working this project for over 3 months now. here is just a small sampling of what works and what doesn't:

1. Heads on the 4.3 have longer runners on them and are cast for the intake flanges to sit at a upright position, not at an angle like the jag/Lincoln heads (which have very short runners I might add) if a head swap can be done on these cars from 4.2 to 4.3 with little difficulty, you would be on to some monster power gains in the upper band! I am working on fabricating a "lower intake manifold" piece to bolt to the jag head and the AM intake (needs to be about 2" tall to clear thermostat housing.)
2. Throttle bore on AM intake is bigger than Jag. bolt holes from intake and throttle body do not line up at all, you could manufacture an adapter plate/ spacer about 1 inch thick (how I am doing it) to solve that.
3. Water piping goes through intake instead of throttle body, you could cap the throttle body or intake if you choose, ( I am thinking of running both through a tee)
4. Fuel rails need to be modified to fit. (or pony up the $400 for the AM rails) Injectors from the 4.2 fit the intake fine. I am fabricating a hold down bracket to keep it simple and use the 4.2 rail. The crossover hose has to be inverted to run under the intake instead of on top.
5. increase in overall engine height by 5 inches. this intake is TALL!!!! (dunno if the hood will clear! thank god its in a hot rod!!!)
6. egr tube runs different than 4.2 (this I don't like! it is visible versus jag which is hidden!)

I am tempted to buy a set of AM 4.3 heads and try them out to see if they are compatible with the rest of the electronics. (not sure about the cams though. I might just swap the 4.2 cams into the 4.3 head castings if they have the same journal sizes... if the cams do work, without hitting the pistons, I may just run the entire setup. that eliminates a ton of guessing work, however, it also increases the price tag by a bunch!!!!

from all I have seen to this point the entire top half of the AM would be needed to swap it cleanly. i'll get some pics going as soon as I get closer.
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2018 | 10:45 AM
  #5  
ccfulton's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,953
Likes: 1,120
From: Phoenix, AZ USA
Default

If I recall the firing order of the AM engine is different from the Jaguar so I don't think you will be able to just swap the top end without a (different) bunch of work.
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2018 | 02:59 PM
  #6  
Cambo's Avatar
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 8,637
Likes: 4,521
From: Sydney, Australia
Default

The firing order is actually the same, but the cylinder numbers were changed, just to be confusing!
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2018 | 06:51 PM
  #7  
ccfulton's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,953
Likes: 1,120
From: Phoenix, AZ USA
Default

Wow, I didn't know AM also offered bespoke cylinder numbering. Now that is differentiation worth paying for.
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2018 | 08:11 PM
  #8  
motorcarman's Avatar
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 13,678
Likes: 9,617
From: Wise County,TX
Default

'optional-extra-custom cylinder numbering'.............. Great marketing ploy.

bob
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2018 | 11:59 AM
  #9  
phatcat67's Avatar
Member
10 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 68
Likes: 40
From: Castle Rock, CO.
Default

Originally Posted by Cambo
The firing order is actually the same, but the cylinder numbers were changed, just to be confusing!
Here is where its weirder!!!!! Lincoln uses the AM firing order!!!!
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2018 | 12:00 PM
  #10  
phatcat67's Avatar
Member
10 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 68
Likes: 40
From: Castle Rock, CO.
Default

Originally Posted by ccfulton
If I recall the firing order of the AM engine is different from the Jaguar so I don't think you will be able to just swap the top end without a (different) bunch of work.
if the cams get swapped into the AM heads would that not solve that too?
 
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2018 | 10:15 AM
  #11  
Panthro's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 66
From: USA
Default

Question phatcat67, what if you didn't use the intake manifold spacers and instead mounted the intercooler to the V8 Vantage heads directly? How far off would they be?
 
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2018 | 09:31 AM
  #12  
phatcat67's Avatar
Member
10 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 68
Likes: 40
From: Castle Rock, CO.
Default

Originally Posted by Panthro
Question phatcat67, what if you didn't use the intake manifold spacers and instead mounted the intercooler to the V8 Vantage heads directly? How far off would they be?
the manifold is about 1 inch wider in stance because of how it mounts. I could fabricate an adapter that would put the mounting point where it needs to be, but it would be tubed, in other words, a mounting plate to a tube to another mounting plate. It would need to be approximately 1.5 inches high, and the bolt patterns are a little different. This is a NA engine I’m mocking it up on, so I’m not too sure. The other major hurdle is that the AM intake sits flat, where the jag/Lincoln ones sit at angles on the heads. I’ll attach a couple pics of the challenge.

update: fuel rails don’t work without modification of the crossover hose! Egr tube can be bent to fit, but not recommended.

 

Last edited by phatcat67; Dec 18, 2018 at 09:33 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2018 | 03:42 AM
  #13  
Panthro's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 66
From: USA
Default

Interesting, thank you. I kinda figured you'd need adapter/spacers to make everything line up, although the difference between the manifold widths is an eye opener. Sorry, forgot you had an XJ8 not an XJR. But, since it's a NA engine, why not the LR/RR 4.4L? Should be easier to source & cheaper
 
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2019 | 10:57 PM
  #14  
phatcat67's Avatar
Member
10 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 68
Likes: 40
From: Castle Rock, CO.
Default

Well, Got some mockups for ya! Here you can see the challenges!!!! besides the obvious of the intake port for the throttle body.....


Shows Just how tall the thing is!!!!

here is the problem #1. angle of attack...

Ports are different!!!! so are bolt patterns!!!! AM uses early 4.0 bolt pattern!

Angle mount of Jaguar on left, Straight mount of AM on right.
 
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2019 | 03:10 PM
  #15  
Panthro's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 66
From: USA
Default

Are the V8 Vantage heads now on the list?
 
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2019 | 09:07 AM
  #16  
phatcat67's Avatar
Member
10 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 68
Likes: 40
From: Castle Rock, CO.
Default

Originally Posted by Panthro
Are the V8 Vantage heads now on the list?
yep! And timing cover. Have to do both in order to use the intake.
 
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2019 | 01:52 PM
  #17  
Panthro's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 66
From: USA
Default

Cool! Might be worth the effort & patience to try to find some 4.7L heads. The valves are bigger & the combustion chamber was better, IIRC. Looks like you have the 4.3L intake, but from my searches on the subject there's no difference between the two besides the color, so could match-up pretty well
 
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2020 | 08:54 AM
  #18  
Panthro's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 66
From: USA
Default

Hey phatcat67, how goes the project?
 
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2020 | 06:08 AM
  #19  
phatcat67's Avatar
Member
10 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 68
Likes: 40
From: Castle Rock, CO.
Default

Looking for my 4.7 heads and timing cover. I’ve abandoned the spacer option as the first mixup I did made it impossible to bolt down without hitting the valve covers. Have to change heads. Thank goodness the vvt bolts on in the same position as the AM.

lots of 4.3 stuff out there though! Note: the AM has 4 knock sensor mounts in the heads compared to our 2. Have to figure out what to do with the other two... hmmm
 
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2020 | 02:07 PM
  #20  
Panthro's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 66
From: USA
Smile

Glad to hear you're still experimenting with this project. IIRC the main changes for the 4.7L cylinder heads were modified intake ports and an inlet valve size increase from 34.9mm to 35.9mm. The intake manifold was modified to match the new port, & the cam chains were widened from a 9 plate design to an 11 plate design. If you're staying with the stock displacement, it might be better to use the 4.3L heads with the 4.7L cams. There was a few sets of 4.7L camshafts & at least 1 crankshaft on eBay recently. Don't know about your budget for this project but might be worth shooting them an offer. The worst they can do is say no.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:26 AM.