Supercharged six?
#2
Yep, pretty rare, only one I could find: 1969 Series II Jaguar E-Type XKE 2+2 4.2 - European Car Magazine
#3
Thats a neat car in the article.
It seems so odd to me that back in the day there wasn't a kit by someone.
It was always cams and webers.
British cars had always been supercharged from the Blower Bentley onwards.
The stock, reliable XK six is all about torque, so a blower would be perfect. Even 5 lbs of boost would be awesome and reliable.
JWW
It seems so odd to me that back in the day there wasn't a kit by someone.
It was always cams and webers.
British cars had always been supercharged from the Blower Bentley onwards.
The stock, reliable XK six is all about torque, so a blower would be perfect. Even 5 lbs of boost would be awesome and reliable.
JWW
#4
#5
I was a Jaguar mechanic (part time) back in the 1970s and there just wasn't that much interest in blowers aftermarket. I expect because the aftermarket was mostly focused on drag racing and putting them on sports cars just wasn't something people considered. My own XKE back then had the side draft Webbers. Cars weren't anywhere near as reliable as they are now and the blower added complexity, a lot of it. Then we had the smog insanity and getting an aftermarket blower approved would have been damn near impossible. The only blown car I recall from back then was the turbo charged Corvair which put out a whopping 180 ponies, about 80 less than what you could get in an XKE of the time (both were 6s) and it wasn't exactly a poster child for reliability or not leaking a ton of oil. I think a combination of improved technology/reliability, relaxing of the smog rules, and the eventual recognition that blowers weren't just good for quarter mile runs changed the market. That's my guess anyway.
#6
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Inverell, NSW, Australia
Posts: 3,052
Received 1,442 Likes
on
898 Posts
Back in the day, most racing XKs were modified to run triple dual side-draft DCOE Weber carburetors using then popular Lynx manifolds, but we went down a different route using 6 individual "fuel injection" units. These did not use an injector in the modern, electronic sense. Instead, each unit held an air butterfly (IIRC 2" bore) fed by a ram tube, with each vertical spindle linked on top to its neighbour(s). As the spindle rotated, a conical needle & seat on the lower end of the spindle metered high pressure fuel into the engine. All were individually adjustable, but a right pain to tune . . . we used purpose made pressure gauge to match air flow at each ram tube. IIRC, the use of aggressive cams, light weight flywheel, and with this induction system, held the idle at a very "lumpy" 1800-2000 rpm . . . but provided instant engine acceleration . . . hardly tolerable in a road car.
Cheers,
Ken
#7
Yep to say my old '64 with the Webers was lumpy was an understatement. But man could it run flat out. Damn car almost broke me though. Taught me never to buy a car, particularly an English car that was abused (it had been thrashed to near death). But it had a racing cam those Weber carbs, and would regularly snap spokes off the wider rear wheels on acceleration. Basically the reason I had to work as a mechanic was to pay to keep that damn car running. Ah the stupidity of youth...
Trending Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Wayne1357
XF and XFR ( X250 )
10
09-25-2018 02:31 AM
darrellleece
XF and XFR ( X250 )
12
08-25-2017 10:56 PM
XJsc-guy
XJ XJ8 / XJR ( X308 )
3
06-14-2015 03:49 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)