Just out... Type 00
Yeah, I tend to agree. It’s certainly not offensive in any way if you ask me. I feel that it’s just so different that it sorta shocks the senses a bit.
Nice - but from a practical standpoint will get dirty fast - those alabaster pedals and foot well will be the first to get marred. The seats and trim next.
I guess you could drive it wearing socks, gloves, and white clothes to avoid the inevitable. And not on a rainy day.
I guess you could drive it wearing socks, gloves, and white clothes to avoid the inevitable. And not on a rainy day.
Nice - but from a practical standpoint will get dirty fast - those alabaster pedals and foot well will be the first to get marred. The seats and trim next.
I guess you could drive it wearing socks, gloves, and white clothes to avoid the inevitable. And not on a rainy day.
I guess you could drive it wearing socks, gloves, and white clothes to avoid the inevitable. And not on a rainy day.
It certainly is unique, but I’m gonna bang my elbow on that brass spine thingy “spanning the length of the cabin”.
Thanks for posting, Valerie.
Thanks for posting, Valerie.
Trending Topics
Nice - but from a practical standpoint will get dirty fast - those alabaster pedals and foot well will be the first to get marred. The seats and trim next.
I guess you could drive it wearing socks, gloves, and white clothes to avoid the inevitable. And not on a rainy day.
I guess you could drive it wearing socks, gloves, and white clothes to avoid the inevitable. And not on a rainy day.
Last edited by randyb; Aug 11, 2025 at 06:21 PM.
Right…the chances of any of this representing the production car are near zero.
Nice - but from a practical standpoint will get dirty fast - those alabaster pedals and foot well will be the first to get marred. The seats and trim next.
I guess you could drive it wearing socks, gloves, and white clothes to avoid the inevitable. And not on a rainy day.
I guess you could drive it wearing socks, gloves, and white clothes to avoid the inevitable. And not on a rainy day.
I think Cadillac copied the Type 00 with their new concept.
https://www.nbcnews.com/business/aut...car-rcna225088
https://www.nbcnews.com/business/aut...car-rcna225088
There's not a single redeeming quality about that interior. Stupid beam down the middle (are you in a fight with your passenger?). Brake pedal designed for looks instead of ease-of-use. Giant theater of screens to watch instead of the road. Stupid awkward oval steering wheel . Annoying motorized glove box that has you waiting for its dramatic opening just to get a napkin for your spilled coffee. Polished brass that makes a reflective glare in the windshield. NO ARM RESTS.
If this was Lady Penelope's new FAB 1 for an upcoming Thunderbirds reboot, I'd be interested. I have no desire to purchase or operate this wheeled living room in the real world.
If this was Lady Penelope's new FAB 1 for an upcoming Thunderbirds reboot, I'd be interested. I have no desire to purchase or operate this wheeled living room in the real world.
Last edited by schuss; Aug 18, 2025 at 09:19 AM.
I think Cadillac copied the Type 00 with their new concept.
https://www.nbcnews.com/business/aut...car-rcna225088
https://www.nbcnews.com/business/aut...car-rcna225088
It's weird they don't look at interior designs that people actually love and admire - Pagani Huayra, Bentley Mulsanne, Ferrari 250GT California - and style concept cars after those instead.
I remember reading that there were at least two (three comes to mind) with the most detailed one for close-up work only having a four gallon tank. When I was a broke student, or perhaps a broke no-longer-student, I saw one listed for $40K, probably one of the ones for longer shots. The fancy one sold a couple of years ago at auction for about $4.5M. I expect that's what you saw, although there were kits to build replicas.









