F-Type ( X152 ) 2014 - Onwards

Tuning: Viezu Predator 670 bhp F-type

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 5, 2018 | 03:09 PM
  #1  
Arne's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Veteran Member
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 340
From: Oslo, Norway
Default Tuning: Viezu Predator 670 bhp F-type

Anyone seen this?
Seems like a hefty claim in increased power...
 
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2018 | 03:18 PM
  #2  
Paul champagne's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 384
Likes: 153
From: Montréal, Corpus Christi, Nice
Default

One observation: after all this work and expense, maybe they could have found a better badging strategy than slapping a white sticker on the hood.
 
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2018 | 05:12 PM
  #3  
Cambo's Avatar
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 8,637
Likes: 4,526
From: Sydney, Australia
Default

10 second quarter mile? Where is the slip?
 
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2018 | 05:29 PM
  #4  
Timbo's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 394
Likes: 102
From: Ruislip, London
Default

Fastest F type in the world, wheres the proof lol
 
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2018 | 06:12 PM
  #5  
powerhouse's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 2,228
Likes: 600
From: Ireland
Default

Db reading is nothing special, a bit pitiful really, this was my old xkr with modified exhaust

 
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2018 | 09:37 PM
  #6  
baldguy's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 48
Likes: 19
From: DFW
Default

I'm not sure pure decibels is a good measurement of the quality of an exhaust note...
 
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2018 | 10:29 AM
  #7  
FType17's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 926
Likes: 264
From: Connecticut
Default

Those claims are quite lofty... With Project Vengenace 640 (V6) pretty much done at 0-60 in 3.0 seconds completed I moved on to the Incubus 700 (V8) and at 690Hp it does NOT turn 2.8 0-60 nor 10 seconds on the quarter....
To achieve that, it needs to shed another 200lbs or so. It's a nice "promotional" video. Powerwise it's comparable to Lister and they have higher numbers (0-60 in 3.2)
 
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2018 | 11:47 AM
  #8  
scm's Avatar
scm
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 4,829
Likes: 1,791
From: Southampton, UK
Default

And he confuses PS with BHP.
 
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2018 | 01:54 PM
  #9  
Gibbo205's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 536
Likes: 135
From: UK
Default

Originally Posted by FType17
Those claims are quite lofty... With Project Vengenace 640 (V6) pretty much done at 0-60 in 3.0 seconds completed I moved on to the Incubus 700 (V8) and at 690Hp it does NOT turn 2.8 0-60 nor 10 seconds on the quarter....
To achieve that, it needs to shed another 200lbs or so. It's a nice "promotional" video. Powerwise it's comparable to Lister and they have higher numbers (0-60 in 3.2)
Why on the video I commented asking to see the quarter mile slip, they said ran a 10.8's in a previous project car, but no time slip and not at a drag strip, so I don't believe it, show me the timeslip I say.

Told them bring it to Santa Pod drag strip in the UK as I know its not so far from them and that they can race me. See how their supposedly 700HP compares to my stock SVR which I've ran a PB of 11.1@126 in at santa pod drag strip.

Though I am hoping for a 10.9999999s run next year, my plan to get this is slightly stickier tyres by switching to michelin cup 2's as my mates with GTR's found these shaved a tenth of 60ft time compared to PS4's, so hoping for similar, shall also remove the rear SVR wing to get car as slippery as possible, doubt it will make any difference and maybe remove passenger seat, plus some nice February cold air and maybe that can just pull me into the very high tens.

 
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2018 | 02:31 PM
  #10  
FType17's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 926
Likes: 264
From: Connecticut
Default

A sister car to mine (client) was taken on the dragstrip, while with 630hp on a lightened AWD V6 it pulled this (Canada, KPH). Personally I don't like the idea of the 1/4 mile because it's a very narrow part of what an F-Type can do so I have not taken mine to a dragstrip ever. 10 seconds would be an amazing accomplishment at 700hp and a heavy R AWD


 
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2018 | 12:18 AM
  #11  
ss23's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 203
Likes: 41
Default

Originally Posted by FType17
A sister car to mine (client) was taken on the dragstrip, while with 630hp on a lightened AWD V6 it pulled this (Canada, KPH). Personally I don't like the idea of the 1/4 mile because it's a very narrow part of what an F-Type can do so I have not taken mine to a dragstrip ever. 10 seconds would be an amazing accomplishment at 700hp and a heavy R AWD
Wow, that is a truly amazing timeslip. The trap speed is the most impressive - that's around 135 mph for all the imperial people .

I think the fastest we've seen on this forum was Philly Single with a RWD V8S using drag radials, a 70-shot, etc. He did manage a 0-60 in 2.8 seconds though (timed using a vbox). How much weight has your client managed to drop btw?

The Viezu car has carbon fibre wheels, guess they might have done some other weight saving measures as well.
 
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2018 | 01:58 PM
  #12  
FType17's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 926
Likes: 264
From: Connecticut
Default

Originally Posted by ss23
Wow, that is a truly amazing timeslip. The trap speed is the most impressive - that's around 135 mph for all the imperial people .

I think the fastest we've seen on this forum was Philly Single with a RWD V8S using drag radials, a 70-shot, etc. He did manage a 0-60 in 2.8 seconds though (timed using a vbox). How much weight has your client managed to drop btw?

The Viezu car has carbon fibre wheels, guess they might have done some other weight saving measures as well.
All of our cars have lightweight forged wheels (17.8 to 19.9 lbs), Another 157lbs was dropped by replacing nearly every steel subframe/bracing with aluminum and 2 piece rotors. The car starts off at 3732lbs dry vs. 3814 for the R version.

If you are familiar with the speeds in each gear you can see/hear how it actually moves from this video



Or on this quick airport runway blast

 
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2018 | 05:12 PM
  #13  
Gibbo205's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 536
Likes: 135
From: UK
Default

Originally Posted by FType17
All of our cars have lightweight forged wheels (17.8 to 19.9 lbs), Another 157lbs was dropped by replacing nearly every steel subframe/bracing with aluminum and 2 piece rotors. The car starts off at 3732lbs dry vs. 3814 for the R version.

If you are familiar with the speeds in each gear you can see/hear how it actually moves from this video

https://youtu.be/upCqBdJPW0s


Or on this quick airport runway blast

https://youtu.be/COpEV23P96A

That bloody moves well! Love how aggressive it bounces and launches.
These aluminum subframe bracing, thats a big weight saving, where can one buy this stuff as thats a damn nice bit of weight to save.
 
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2018 | 10:36 PM
  #14  
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 16,950
Likes: 4,729
From: Maryland, US
Default

FType17, how much wheel hp are you getting from that 3.4 liter engine?
 
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2018 | 09:24 AM
  #15  
FType17's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 926
Likes: 264
From: Connecticut
Default

Originally Posted by Unhingd
FType17, how much wheel hp are you getting from that 3.4 liter engine?
557WHP on Mustang AWD1750 on regular street tune
 
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2018 | 09:34 AM
  #16  
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 16,950
Likes: 4,729
From: Maryland, US
Default

The Mustang reads a bit high but still significantly more than a 5.0 SVR. Very impressive.
 
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2018 | 09:44 AM
  #17  
FType17's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 926
Likes: 264
From: Connecticut
Default

Originally Posted by Unhingd
The Mustang reads a bit high but still significantly more than a 5.0 SVR. Very impressive.
Actually that model Mustang, maybe because of the setup, reads lower than a DynoJet.
Thank you for supporting a discussion based on Wheel power. Too many people get scammed with adjusted flywheel power gains when in reality without a baseline under replicable conditions and using unadjusted readings they can easily believe in greater gains than actual. A stock SVR on that Dyno comes to 483WHP, I just tested one before working on it last week
 
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2018 | 10:13 AM
  #18  
Gibbo205's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 536
Likes: 135
From: UK
Default

Originally Posted by FType17
Actually that model Mustang, maybe because of the setup, reads lower than a DynoJet.
Thank you for supporting a discussion based on Wheel power. Too many people get scammed with adjusted flywheel power gains when in reality without a baseline under replicable conditions and using unadjusted readings they can easily believe in greater gains than actual. A stock SVR on that Dyno comes to 483WHP, I just tested one before working on it last week
Working on an SVR?
What did you get out of it out of interest?

Also these lightweight aluminum bracing components, any update on those I'd be very happy to shave 157lbs from my SVR if at all possible, I thought I'd gone as far as I could go with the lipo battery and 2PC rotors, as I don't want to touch interior or move away from factory wheels or body panels I dismissed I could not reduce weight any further.
 
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2018 | 10:28 AM
  #19  
FType17's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 926
Likes: 264
From: Connecticut
Default

Originally Posted by Gibbo205
Working on an SVR?
What did you get out of it out of interest?

Also these lightweight aluminum bracing components, any update on those I'd be very happy to shave 157lbs from my SVR if at all possible, I thought I'd gone as far as I could go with the lipo battery and 2PC rotors, as I don't want to touch interior or move away from factory wheels or body panels I dismissed I could not reduce weight any further.
What did I get out of it? I get paid among other things ;-)
Custom parts such as wheels, subframe parts, control arms, sway bars etc. are not for retail sale, they are part of full car upgrade packages. $ for Lbs the battery isn't that high on the list but in the weight saving, many small things also factor in from items such as titanium connecting rods and lighter pistons to 52lbs saved just from swapping wheels and tires. Nothing is removed from the inside of the car, stripping the car would be a sacrilege, but if oe wanted, the seats are very heavy, they can be swapped, the rear glass can be replaced with Lexan. At that point however, the F-Type is not what I like it to be and many of my clients.
 
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2018 | 06:50 AM
  #20  
ss23's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 203
Likes: 41
Default

Does anyone know which pulleys they changed? I'm wondering whether it makes more sense to install the 62mm upper pulley (along with my 177mm crank pulley) and spin the supercharger at ~18,600 RPM at 6,500 crank RPM or whether I should get the TCU tuned to shift in auto at 7,000 RPM (supercharger would then spin at 19,100 RPM) and keep the stock upper pulley.

Please correct if my pulley diameters are wrong, I believe the stock crank pulley is 159mm and the upper pulley is 65mm (62mm on the V6).

I believe there could be issues with the fueling and ignition systems with both the upper and lower pullies fitted so curious if Viezu made any further changes. The smaller upper pulley would also shift some torque earlier but not sure a RWD V8 really needs that
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:26 AM.