MKI / MKII S type 240 340 & Daimler 1955 - 1967

Exhausted

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-10-2018, 09:49 AM
JohnnyMacc's Avatar
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2016
Location: US, RI
Posts: 27
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Exhausted

Having trouble fitting a bell stainless kit to my 1960 Mark2. My manifolds are the angled type. I bought the bell kit for the early MK2. The downpipes that came with the kit don't seem to line up right. Also it doesn't seem studs will be long enough. Arg!!! Thoughts?
 
  #2  
Old 03-10-2018, 02:19 PM
TilleyJon's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Bath UK
Posts: 1,654
Received 437 Likes on 363 Posts
Default

Have a read of this thread, it hopefully helps, or post the part numbers for the exhaust you have bought and your engine and chassis numbers and we can see what we can do to help further.

https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/m...xhaust-189313/
 
The following users liked this post:
JohnnyMacc (03-10-2018)
  #3  
Old 03-10-2018, 03:26 PM
JohnnyMacc's Avatar
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2016
Location: US, RI
Posts: 27
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Car and Bell exhaust info

1960 Mark 2 3.8
Chassis# P212391 DN
Engine# LA4512-9

Bell down tubes # JR 59 & 60
 
  #4  
Old 03-10-2018, 03:30 PM
JohnnyMacc's Avatar
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2016
Location: US, RI
Posts: 27
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Im thinking i might have the wrong downtubes. They seem to be angled for the straight manifolds.
 
  #5  
Old 03-10-2018, 05:07 PM
csbush's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 809
Received 223 Likes on 127 Posts
Default

Jr 59 and 60 are the right part numbers. That is what I have for mine, but not at the point of installing them yet.
 
  #6  
Old 03-10-2018, 07:06 PM
Jose's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 8,608
Received 2,429 Likes on 1,828 Posts
Default

wow, I have a Bell stainless system in my S type, beautifully polished, I installed it myself with the car raised on blocks and a trolley to slide under it. everything fits perfectly. Sounds like a XK-120.
 
Attached Thumbnails Exhausted-bell-jaguar-exhaust.jpg  
The following users liked this post:
JohnnyMacc (03-12-2018)
  #7  
Old 03-11-2018, 01:10 AM
TilleyJon's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Bath UK
Posts: 1,654
Received 437 Likes on 363 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JohnnyMacc
1960 Mark 2 3.8
Chassis# P212391 DN
Engine# LA4512-9

Bell down tubes # JR 59 & 60
They seem to be the correct parts for your car, question now is may be the manifolds been changed ?

Can you see the part numbers on the manifolds they should be C16191 and C16192, if they are C18398 and C18399, they are the later manifolds, the earlier manifolds are no longer available so they may have been changed in which case the downpipes will be wrong and should be JR70 and JR71
 
The following users liked this post:
JohnnyMacc (03-12-2018)
  #8  
Old 03-11-2018, 07:36 AM
dmericas's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 118
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JohnnyMacc
... Also it doesn't seem studs will be long enough. Arg!!! Thoughts?
I had the same issue with the length of the studs. Longer replacements are readily available. I think I got mine from McMaster-Carr.
 
The following users liked this post:
JohnnyMacc (03-12-2018)
  #9  
Old 03-12-2018, 02:50 PM
JohnnyMacc's Avatar
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2016
Location: US, RI
Posts: 27
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I had 1" 3/4 studs installed last week and just ordered JR70 and JR71 from SNG. Hope to have good news later this week.
 
  #10  
Old 03-13-2018, 05:34 PM
Jose's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 8,608
Received 2,429 Likes on 1,828 Posts
Default

I have two manifolds for a 3.4 or 3.8 liter with long studs if anybody needs a pair.
 
Attached Thumbnails Exhausted-01-manifolds-3.8.jpg  
  #11  
Old 03-18-2018, 06:29 AM
JohnnyMacc's Avatar
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2016
Location: US, RI
Posts: 27
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The new Bell downpipes came in and fit like a glove. Crushable gasket that comes with the kit is still to thick, but I found a thin pair at a local auto parts store that seemed to do the trick. We'll have to see how it all works when its running. Hope to get the rest of the kit installed today. Thanks to everyone for the help.
 
  #12  
Old 03-22-2018, 03:37 PM
JohnnyMacc's Avatar
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2016
Location: US, RI
Posts: 27
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Tailpipes are tight against tank

Fitted up the rest of the Bell kit and the tailpipes are sitting tight against the fuel tank. Tried loosening the mounts etc but to no avail wondering if thats the normal fit?
 
  #13  
Old 03-22-2018, 04:27 PM
tedwone's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Hesperia, California
Posts: 191
Received 31 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

I recently installed the Bell system on my 1960 MK2 and noticed the same thing. The tailpipes touch the fuel tank at the rear. They also touch the body. I'm not sure if this is the normal fit, but I used all new hangers and this was the result I got.
 
  #14  
Old 03-22-2018, 04:35 PM
Jose's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 8,608
Received 2,429 Likes on 1,828 Posts
Default

in my inexperienced opinion with the MK-2 tailpipes. I would say no, they should not touch the body and certainly not the tank. There should be enough clearance.

Maybe the hangers are the problem.
 
The following users liked this post:
cat_as_trophy (03-22-2018)
  #15  
Old 03-22-2018, 04:47 PM
tedwone's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Hesperia, California
Posts: 191
Received 31 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

The hangers I installed with my Bell system are identical to the originals. I am wondering if the Bell system dimensions are wrong. I agree with Jose. I doesn't make sense for the tail pipe to touch any part of the body or fuel tank. Heat should not be applied to a fuel tank via the exhaust system.
 
The following users liked this post:
Jose (03-22-2018)
  #16  
Old 03-22-2018, 04:52 PM
cat_as_trophy's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Inverell, NSW, Australia
Posts: 3,014
Received 1,410 Likes on 876 Posts
Default

+1. Jose is absolutely correct.

Aim for 1/2" (12mm) minimum clearance. Vibration is a normal feature of any engine mounted component but especially exhaust pipes. That's why they are mounted with flexible hangers. Any rattling against the body will transmit noise into the cabin and result in premature wear . . . the thought of such abrasion of a hot exhaust beating a hole into a fuel tank could quickly result in a rear end barbeque noone needs.

Cheers,

Ken
 
The following 2 users liked this post by cat_as_trophy:
Jose (03-22-2018), tedwone (03-22-2018)
  #17  
Old 03-22-2018, 05:06 PM
Jose's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 8,608
Received 2,429 Likes on 1,828 Posts
Default

yes, I do not like the idea of a hot tailpipe touching the gas tank or anything else for that matter.

when I installed a new Bell exhaust in my '65 S type there were no fitting or clearance problems, and I did it all by myself, piece by piece, everything just "fell" in place, and the S type has two tanks, two rear resonators near them, but the clearances were fine.

Since there are two of you with the same issue, and this is obviously a serious concern, I would contact the seller and ask for a contact person at Bell Exhausts UK.

I am sure others are having the same problem.
 
The following users liked this post:
cat_as_trophy (03-22-2018)
  #18  
Old 03-22-2018, 05:31 PM
tedwone's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Hesperia, California
Posts: 191
Received 31 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

I just went back to my garage, disconnected the rear hanger and "bent" the pipes down at the rear of the mufflers. I intend to make a small extension that will keep the rear hanger low enough to provide for about a 1/2" clearance from the fuel tank and rear body. I also had a problem with the installation of the Bell system and sent an email to Bell asking about their quality control, but received no response. I had to do some cutting and "adjusting" to the Bell parts to make them fit together and to fit my car.
 
  #19  
Old 03-22-2018, 05:38 PM
Jose's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 8,608
Received 2,429 Likes on 1,828 Posts
Default

Ted,
document it with pictures, it might help others. And what is a 1933 Standard?
 
  #20  
Old 03-22-2018, 05:42 PM
cat_as_trophy's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Inverell, NSW, Australia
Posts: 3,014
Received 1,410 Likes on 876 Posts
Default

Ted, your experience of Bell's poor customer communications really is a concern and again, I commend Jose's sound advice to write direct to Bell's top brass . . . yes, there really still is a place for old fashioned snail mail. Email may be fast, but it is unlikely you will hit the boss, so it becomes "not my problem".

Certainly sounds like a QC problem. You should not have to go cutting pipes to fit, or making up special hanger brackets. Having said that . . . Ted, you did as I would have also . . . whatever it takes to gain and maintain that essential clearance.

Best wishes,

Ken
 
The following users liked this post:
Jose (03-22-2018)


Quick Reply: Exhausted



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:35 AM.