XJ XJ6 / XJR6 ( X300 ) 1995-1997

96 for an 01?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 07-17-2013, 01:35 PM
etaent's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Woodhaven, NY
Posts: 629
Received 89 Likes on 58 Posts
Default 96 for an 01?

So I have a 1996 XJ6 LHD and I've taken great care of her but I feel like its time for an upgrade. She has been nothing but dependable to me and I want to make sure that I am making the right choice so I am posing the question, would I be wrong if I sold my 96 and bought an 01? How reliable is the newer XJ8's? Is there anything I should look for when I go look at the car? Thanks for the tips guys!
 
  #2  
Old 07-17-2013, 10:08 PM
aholbro1's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Decatur, TX
Posts: 4,612
Received 1,638 Likes on 1,066 Posts
Default

I assume you've read all the pertinent threads in the x308 section? Some, not all 2001's had the final-fix for the cam chain tensioners, but I believe you must go by engine number to be sure. Not really sure about plastic water pump impellers..but seems like I've read the 03's had all the fixes in from the factory. Even so, beware the X308 thermostat is prone to stick closed, whereas ours are much more failsafe, preferring to stick open.

Interesting (and at first unbelievable) tidbit I picked up a few months ago harassing the x308 guys is that you maybe want the supercharged version for reliability. I know, right? I called 'em on it - "how does addng a supercharger increase reliability?!?" but they made a plausible case for it - don't remember it all now, but lack of VVT on SC versions, think maybe a more robust gearbox...more but I don't recall..only recall noting I'll limit my search to SC when the time eventually comes ...
Good luck in your search.
 
  #3  
Old 07-18-2013, 12:39 AM
Tirefriar's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: California
Posts: 628
Received 89 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

Besides the obvious superior performance and upgraded interior, the SC version has a 5 speed trans vs. a less reliable 4 speed, steel thermostat housing versus plastic, no vvt, etc.

The tensioners are not a big deal. I had a shop do them for me but plenty of members here did these themselves.
 
  #4  
Old 07-18-2013, 02:50 AM
GGG's Avatar
GGG
GGG is offline
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Durham, UK
Posts: 120,446
Received 16,798 Likes on 12,167 Posts
Default

Good advice above from alholbro1 and Tirefriar.

I've had both a 1996 XJ6 and a 2001 XJ8L in the past and would happily have a good example of either if I needed a four door again. Although visually similar, the X308 has an improved interior in additon to the obviously more powerful V8.

As with all Jaguars, service history is critical and any gaps should be questioned. Provided you keep in mind the two main issues of tensioners and cooling system when searching and viewing potential purchases, the X308 will give you everything you have with the XJ6 and more.

Graham
 
  #5  
Old 07-18-2013, 05:07 AM
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Adelaide Stralia
Posts: 27,301
Received 10,309 Likes on 6,819 Posts
Default

My 2 cents worth, as I also am looking at moving the MIGHTY X300 on, maybe.

The X308 has the ZF 5HP24 trans, and it is a sealed for life unit, RUBBISH.

If it has not had a trans fluid change and is over "about" 60k miles, be warned. ZF here are advising strongly towards a fluid change, at least, at the 80k kms mark.

We have a few in our little group, and reliable they are, but the trans fluid is fiddly to fill to the "full" spot, and one here was 200ml down and made some weird noises, but once topped off, quiet as it should be.

The "R versions have a much stronger trans, same as AMG cars I believe, still a sealed for life unit, but not a known issue, although trans fluid changes are still required.
 
  #6  
Old 07-18-2013, 05:31 AM
Ziggy's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 331
Received 40 Likes on 37 Posts
Default

Having driven an X308 a bit, I came to the conclusion that I'd consider one as a perfectly acceptable alternative, but not really an upgrade worth doing for the sake of it. If you're just after something with less years/miles on the clock, fine. That's comparing 3.2 with 3.2; an X308 XJR is another thing entirely!
 
  #7  
Old 07-18-2013, 11:02 AM
etaent's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Woodhaven, NY
Posts: 629
Received 89 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Thanks for all the info guys!
 
  #8  
Old 07-22-2013, 11:01 PM
Tirefriar's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: California
Posts: 628
Received 89 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

I've just sold my 2001 XJR. Aside from doing the tensioners, I really didn't have to do any other maintenance. Add oil changes to the list. The urge for a Berlina or dare I dream a Giulia sedan is too great to resist. One thing I wasn't crazy about with X308 is its electronics complexity. I do plan to return to Jaguar camp, this time with a X300 Super Charged. Although X300 R is less powerful and shorter one gear, I hold that in-line 6 in great regards. Plus you get an LSD and much simpler electronics. It may sound like a step down to X300 from X308 but I don't see it that way. Each one of these great cars has its particular strengths and appeal.
 
The following users liked this post:
etaent (07-23-2013)
  #9  
Old 07-23-2013, 07:12 AM
jjd's Avatar
jjd
jjd is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: ireland
Posts: 290
Received 33 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

I dunno, if the x300 is doing the job and is as good as you say i personally wouldn't bother with x308. I have xjr x308 and x300 sovereign and if i had to pick one to live with everyday it would be the sovereign. Unless you are getting an xjr the performance difference is negligible day to day and x300 is plenty refined as it is.looks wise there is little to distinguish the cars. But x300 is much easier maintain with almost no pitfalls associated with v8.
 

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:30 PM.