XJ6 & XJ12 Series I, II & III 1968-1992
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

how reliable?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 04-14-2011, 11:53 AM
JaguarXKR's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 862
Received 59 Likes on 45 Posts
Default how reliable?

I was just wondering how reliable the 94-96 xj12 with the 6.0 v12 is?
 
  #2  
Old 04-14-2011, 12:19 PM
Fraser Mitchell's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Crewe, England
Posts: 9,391
Received 2,430 Likes on 1,940 Posts
Default

AFAIK the V12 cars were equally as reliable as the cars with the straight six engines. Not many were sold, (certainly in the UK) due to their huge thirst for fuel.

YOu mention 1994-1996, and this crosses over from the XJ40 "squared-off" look to the more shapely X300-type body which looks better and the later car was better made as Ford had finally sorted out the Jaguar factories by then. The V12 is probably a better bet than the later V8 if you want a lot of cylinders in your engine.
 
  #3  
Old 04-14-2011, 07:57 PM
dba-one's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Palm Harbor, FL
Posts: 222
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

I'd buy one as part of a personal collection so it couldn't be a daily driver.
 
  #4  
Old 04-14-2011, 08:09 PM
Doug's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest USA
Posts: 24,743
Received 10,757 Likes on 7,101 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fraser Mitchell
AFAIK the V12 cars were equally as reliable as the cars with the straight six engines. .


I agree.

And it should be pointed out that "reliable" doesn't necessarily mean inexpensive or easy to own :-)

A 15-20 y/o Jag can be very reliable but it takes some money and effort to get there.

Cheers
DD
 
  #5  
Old 04-14-2011, 09:07 PM
JaguarXKR's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 862
Received 59 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fraser Mitchell
AFAIK the V12 cars were equally as reliable as the cars with the straight six engines. Not many were sold, (certainly in the UK) due to their huge thirst for fuel.

YOu mention 1994-1996, and this crosses over from the XJ40 "squared-off" look to the more shapely X300-type body which looks better and the later car was better made as Ford had finally sorted out the Jaguar factories by then. The V12 is probably a better bet than the later V8 if you want a lot of cylinders in your engine.
Dont all of the 94-96 have the same engine in them, the 6.0? So what your saying is the x300 in more reliable even with the same engine than the xj40(the ones with the square headlights?
Thanks
 
  #6  
Old 04-14-2011, 10:02 PM
Doug's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest USA
Posts: 24,743
Received 10,757 Likes on 7,101 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JaguarXKR
Dont all of the 94-96 have the same engine in them, the 6.0? So what your saying is the x300 in more reliable even with the same engine than the xj40(the ones with the square headlights?
Thanks


I think Fraser was trying to say the the 6.0 V12 wouldn't make the car any *less* reliable. That is, the 6.0 isn't a reliability liability :-) :-)

Broadly speaking the X300 is considered more reliable than an XJ40. The last of the Xj40s were known to be pretty good, though.

To jump on my oft-repeated soapbox, reliability of a 15-20 year old Jag is gonna depend primarily on the care it has rec'd thus far...and the care it receives in the future. Weak points or defects to the *original* design and build quality are not really relevent 15-20 years down the road. If it lasted 15-20 years it couldn't have been too bad to begin with :-)

Cheers
DD
 
  #7  
Old 04-15-2011, 03:28 PM
Fraser Mitchell's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Crewe, England
Posts: 9,391
Received 2,430 Likes on 1,940 Posts
Default

Just to butt in again.......

Reliability is more than just the engine, and I think most people accept that the X300 saloons were far better specced and assembled than the XJ40 series. Improvements in the production facilities were huge over the period mentioned. Ford spent a fortune on production facilities. They had to, the Jaguar stuff was not only worn out it was decades old.

Ford then spoiled it with the early V8s
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hoodun
XJS ( X27 )
40
02-20-2023 05:52 AM
LilaJagHubby
US Lower Atlantic
5
03-01-2017 10:20 AM
wannabebuyer
XF and XFR ( X250 )
4
10-01-2015 12:34 PM
bydand
XF and XFR ( X250 )
8
09-28-2015 09:47 AM
bydand
XF and XFR ( X250 )
1
09-27-2015 12:00 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: how reliable?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:18 AM.