XJS ( X27 ) 1975 - 1996 3.6 4.0 5.3 6.0

Hypothetical question (intake manifolds)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 10-18-2018, 12:49 PM
VancouverXJ6's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,235
Received 537 Likes on 364 Posts
Default Hypothetical question (intake manifolds)

If the V12 intake manifold & filter assembly could be redesigned from the ground up and offered as a drop in replacement for the stock unit what characteristics (technical or cosmetic) should it have?

I know AJ6 Engineering used to offer enhanced versions with flow matched runners and trumpets added inside but this service was discontinued due to health/age issues.

There was also a fellow here awhile ago with Group A? manifolds he was making which had several improvements but no doubt cost a fortune to build, but I'd rather explore options for something better rather then reinvent a poorly made wheel.
 
  #2  
Old 10-18-2018, 01:38 PM
Daim's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Bremen, Germany
Posts: 5,906
Received 2,180 Likes on 1,583 Posts
Default

Personally, they look pretty. But they aren't as efficient as they could be. I'd see if it would be possible to form them like the Volvo B6304S1 intake manifold is. All runners are equal length and start from a ball. Like that all air is taken in correctly and perfectly. Or another way, have 6 individual throttle bodies right in front of the head ports.

Maybe even a switchable intake runner, like many smaller 4 cylinders have to up the torque at lower rpms and up the hp at higher rpms.
 
  #3  
Old 10-18-2018, 05:38 PM
JigJag's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,331
Received 580 Likes on 361 Posts
Default

Significant cost and complexity with little upside to performance? Sounds like someone’s ideal project.

All opinion from here...

Uneven runner lengths are not bad. They distribute the peak flow over a range of RPMs rather than stack them up at one. Who can take advantage of that in actual use?

Plenums are undersized, but not drastically, enlarging these may offer the best bang for your many bucks.

Adding inlet bells inside the plenums is not going to significantly impact performance.

Tying the two banks plenums together more effectively may be an untried mod that could be significant. Effectively doubling the plenum size for both banks, tying both plenums air masses and both throttle bodies together could have significant benefit. A throttle neck sized alluminum runner connecting the front of each plenum together should do.

Heads still sit there like the bouncer at the club door.

 

Last edited by JigJag; 10-18-2018 at 05:40 PM.
The following users liked this post:
ronbros (10-18-2018)
  #4  
Old 10-18-2018, 07:32 PM
VancouverXJ6's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,235
Received 537 Likes on 364 Posts
Default

Thanks,

I have a set of manifolds sitting on my coffee table...thats normal right? ...anyway after spending an entire saturday polishing them I wondered if it was worth extruding/flow match and ceramic coating them or having a CNC shop design something better or some improved variation. My original plan was to have the spare set enlarged and smoothed out then coated because it's only $200 here to do them, and there were proven hp gains when heat shielding was used under the manifolds in track/race applications.

As with most Jaguar things if your going to spend $xxxx for questionable gains, why not spend abit more and go all the way? There are a handful of shops in north america and australia that could easily fabricate something better its just a matter of setting the parameters for the design.

Tying the two banks plenums together more effectively may be an untried mod that could be significant. Effectively doubling the plenum size for both banks, tying both plenums air masses and both throttle bodies together could have significant benefit. A throttle neck sized alluminum runner connecting the front of each plenum together should do.
I have a spare set of crossover pipe fittings I could add a second pipe on the front of my car and see, if nothing else it would make for a saturday well spent.


Another question I had was what exactly are the design changes through the years with these manifolds? there are multiple part numbers on the jaguarclassicparts website diagrams but aside from overrun valves and other non-critical stuff it isn't immediately apparent.
 

Last edited by VancouverXJ6; 10-18-2018 at 07:42 PM.
  #5  
Old 10-18-2018, 07:34 PM
ronbros's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Austin tx and Daytona FL.
Posts: 7,362
Received 1,231 Likes on 939 Posts
Default

cylinder heads are the main air flow restrictions, the Jag V12 was never designed as a REAL Hi-performance engine!

it was designed to be smooth ,no vibration, and have 12 cylinders, (Ferrari ,etc). all selling points back 40/50yrs ago!

i still love the damn things , one of my 1st cars was a 12 cylinder Lincolns.

ron
 
  #6  
Old 10-18-2018, 08:45 PM
LongJohn's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Houston
Posts: 189
Received 49 Likes on 32 Posts
Default



like this...
 
  #7  
Old 10-18-2018, 10:29 PM
VancouverXJ6's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,235
Received 537 Likes on 364 Posts
Default

Thats abit more complicated then what I was thinking, but it is one of the images that inspired my quest. A universal easy drop-in solution that plugs into the existing throttle/fuel assembly is more marketable.
 
  #8  
Old 10-19-2018, 02:55 AM
warrjon's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Vic Australia
Posts: 4,638
Received 2,576 Likes on 1,712 Posts
Default

The GRPA manifolds are useless on a 5.3L road car, they don't make power until 4500rpm+, so unless you plan on a min of 7500rpm redline do not go this big with the runners.

A friend of mine has built a lot of high power Jag V12 race engines including engines for Roddy, his advice to me for intake manifolds was, use the stock runners and add a larger plenum, 100mm (4") square and move the TB's to the front.
 
The following users liked this post:
Jsquared (02-06-2024)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
orangeblossom
XJS ( X27 )
41
12-07-2018 08:35 PM
MooseJag
PRIVATE For Sale / Trade or Buy Classifieds
0
05-16-2017 04:05 AM
krswen
E type ( XK-E )
5
02-13-2017 06:31 PM
chilefish
S-Type / S type R Supercharged V8 ( X200 )
4
07-14-2015 11:09 PM
juliovega914
XJ XJ8 / XJR ( X308 )
10
02-19-2014 03:45 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: Hypothetical question (intake manifolds)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:22 PM.