XJS ( X27 ) 1975 - 1996 3.6 4.0 5.3 6.0

V12 Tappets Camshaft

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 12-21-2015, 07:34 AM
xjsv12's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Moscow Russia
Posts: 1,082
Received 354 Likes on 214 Posts
Default V12 Tappets Camshaft

I've a problem with tappets gap. My mashinist asked about oversize. Does somebody know about this?
NAC2543AA is still available, but is STD.
The engine is very noisy as the diesel


And further. What is the difference between 5.3 and 6.0 camshafts
 
Attached Thumbnails V12 Tappets Camshaft-20151221_161533.jpg  

Last edited by xjsv12; 12-21-2015 at 11:44 AM.
The following users liked this post:
ronbros (12-21-2015)
  #2  
Old 12-21-2015, 03:36 PM
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Adelaide Stralia
Posts: 27,306
Received 10,312 Likes on 6,822 Posts
Default

Never heard of oversize buckets for these engines.

Most of the noises are due to the wrong shim sizes UNDER those buckets.

I realise that the buckets can wear the tappet block on the V12, due to lack of oil flow, but I have never heard noises from that complaint.

If its worn that bad, a new alloy tappet block would be needed.
 

Last edited by Grant Francis; 12-22-2015 at 04:11 AM.
The following users liked this post:
xjsv12 (12-22-2015)
  #3  
Old 12-21-2015, 06:06 PM
ronbros's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Austin tx and Daytona FL.
Posts: 7,362
Received 1,231 Likes on 939 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by xjsv12
I've a problem with tappets gap. My mashinist asked about oversize. Does somebody know about this?
NAC2543AA is still available, but is STD.
The engine is very noisy as the diesel


And further. What is the difference between 5.3 and 6.0 camshafts
.


i have heard of copper plating OD outside diameter, a few thou. if it is to big just light hone of carrier bore, sounds doable to me

but not the lope contact surface , chilled iron hard.

also there were some much larger diameter for race only camshafts!

donno about 5.3 VS 6.0 camshafts, but seems the pre 5.3 and HE 5.3 cams are different, must be so, lot more low end torque with HE 5.3. altho logic says, FORD engineers would alter cam specs for the 6.0 for emission reasons!

also timing numbers are different, HE reduces overlap, and lowers rpm potential, HE drops hi-rpm torque peak earlier than pre-he peak.

now on my pre i loosened the tappets/follower clearence couple thou. some old go-fast idea! no problem , i have nice noisey lash clearance anyway. RACE CAMS.
 

Last edited by ronbros; 12-21-2015 at 06:09 PM.
The following users liked this post:
xjsv12 (12-22-2015)
  #4  
Old 12-21-2015, 08:22 PM
superchargedtr6's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Greer SC
Posts: 1,078
Received 398 Likes on 302 Posts
Default

Are you sure you don't have a dropped valve seat or two? Jag V12s get more quiet as they wear. Being a overhead cam engine, the valve face wear, along with the valve seat wear, cause the valve stem to get closer to the shim, not further away. If anything, a Jag V12 would be more likely to burn a valve, drop a valve seat, not have the cam followers loosen up. But, as already mentioned, the lare diameter cam followers were for all out race engines using VERY high lift cams, which required the larger cam followers. Very rare, and VERY expensive.
 
The following 2 users liked this post by superchargedtr6:
ronbros (12-23-2015), xjsv12 (12-22-2015)
  #5  
Old 12-22-2015, 04:14 AM
xjsv12's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Moscow Russia
Posts: 1,082
Received 354 Likes on 214 Posts
Default

My research, how was modify tappets on V12.
+ Tappet
C7213 5.3 preHE long skirt
C44010 5.3 preHE and HE
↳ EBC8110 5.3 HE
↳ NAC2543AA 5.3 and 6.0 including 6.0 X300 -
-
Barrat offer AEM C44010 FE12561 with dimensions 38.10 x 25.40mm
Original sizes is approx 35.0X 21.5mm
 
  #6  
Old 12-22-2015, 06:59 PM
warrjon's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Vic Australia
Posts: 4,638
Received 2,576 Likes on 1,712 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by xjsv12
And further. What is the difference between 5.3 and 6.0 camshafts
The 6.0L has 1thou less lift and a slower ramp than the 5.3L HE according to my ROM
 
The following users liked this post:
xjsv12 (12-23-2015)
  #7  
Old 12-23-2015, 02:27 PM
ronbros's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Austin tx and Daytona FL.
Posts: 7,362
Received 1,231 Likes on 939 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by superchargedtr6
Are you sure you don't have a dropped valve seat or two? Jag V12s get more quiet as they wear. Being a overhead cam engine, the valve face wear, along with the valve seat wear, cause the valve stem to get closer to the shim, not further away. If anything, a Jag V12 would be more likely to burn a valve, drop a valve seat, not have the cam followers loosen up. But, as already mentioned, the lare diameter cam followers were for all out race engines using VERY high lift cams, which required the larger cam followers. Very rare, and VERY expensive.
.

tr6,, i am quite sure there are no dropped seats,LOL.

been running great for 21yrs, valve clatter is normal for my valve train setup, have checked a few times with stethoscope for unusual noise all is fine!
compression test just last yr, all within 10-15psi of each other.

and the hard shims can wear some and be looser than new setup

solid valve train will never be as quiet as hydraulic system.

and most motorheads like the sound(to each his own).
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
farmertk
XJ XJ6 / XJR6 ( X300 )
7
01-09-2016 03:48 PM
kamalislamof
XJ XJ8 / XJR ( X308 )
5
12-22-2015 06:10 PM
johnlw100
XK8 / XKR ( X100 )
7
12-20-2015 07:20 AM
davidladewig
S-Type / S type R Supercharged V8 ( X200 )
0
12-17-2015 08:47 PM
murphman
XJ XJ6 / XJ8 / XJR ( X350 & X358 )
3
12-17-2015 02:57 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: V12 Tappets Camshaft



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:53 PM.