XJS ( X27 ) 1975 - 1996 3.6 4.0 5.3 6.0

what are these...and why does everyone remove them?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 15, 2012 | 07:32 PM
  #1  
J_C_R's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 782
Likes: 182
From: central Indiana
Default what are these...and why does everyone remove them?

Seems like every web site I look at that has anything to do with making modifications to the V12 has the "cap" at the radiator end of both intake manifolds (see photo) removed.

Being a minimalist at heart (I know that conflicts with owning a V12 Jag, but what the heck) I'm more than happy to strip it of anything it doesn't need (no emission inspections here), and I can see where a cap to replace this piece would be easy to fabricate. What are the advantages of doing so?

Thanks!

John
1997 XJS V12, (supposedly) 61,000 miles
 
Attached Thumbnails what are these...and why does everyone remove them?-manifold-cap.jpg  
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2012 | 07:42 PM
  #2  
M90power's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,738
Likes: 70
From: WV
Default

those are your fuel pressure regulators. you dont want to cap anything. 8p
 
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2012 | 08:10 PM
  #3  
Grant Francis's Avatar
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 28,792
Likes: 11,270
From: Adelaide Stralia
Default

UMMMMM< WRONG.

Those are the "overrun valves", and I am surprised a '97 XJ-S has them at all.

The were originally for extra air on closed throttle overrun, such as down a hill.

If its an '87 as I suspect it may be, the ECU has a fuel cut off feature at closed throttle plate, and overrun revs above 1200rpm.

I removed them from ALL my V12's very early in the ownership.

what are these...and why does everyone remove them?-lh-inlet-no-overrun-valves.jpg

Mine run NO emission stuff at all, no testing here ever.

 
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2012 | 08:50 PM
  #4  
M90power's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,738
Likes: 70
From: WV
Default

whups, my bad. i didnt zoom in on the pic.
 
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2012 | 11:05 PM
  #5  
ATL Dave's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 87
Likes: 12
From: Atlanta, GA USA
Default

No such thing as a '97 XJS. But on a Lucas HE, there were overrun valves that prevented backfires on deceleration by allowing air into the manifolds. I'm not sure that's what you have in the picture though...I think it's on the other end of the manifold.

Dave
Atlanta
 
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2012 | 01:24 AM
  #6  
Grant Francis's Avatar
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 28,792
Likes: 11,270
From: Adelaide Stralia
Default

I am with Dave.

You say the "front" of the manifold, SO yes they are the overrun caps with the spring loaded valve inside each.

As far as I remember when I was at Jaguar, they were deleted with the Marelli cars in about '89ish.
 
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2012 | 06:06 AM
  #7  
J_C_R's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 782
Likes: 182
From: central Indiana
Default

Sorry guys, got fat-fingered with my numbers. It is a 1987 XJS.

Did they prove to be ineffective? Is that why Jaguar removed them?

Is there a reason "to remove or not to remove"? My thought is the less stuff cluttering the engine bay the better...

John
 
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2012 | 09:23 AM
  #8  
meeither's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 163
Likes: 12
From: North Carolina
Default

Think he might have meant 87 mate.
 
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2012 | 09:27 AM
  #9  
ATL Dave's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 87
Likes: 12
From: Atlanta, GA USA
Default

The later cars had the overrun fuel cutoff done in the ECU. The fuel injectors won't fire above ~1200 RPM if the throttles are closed.

You can block them off. I did it on my '83.

Dave
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dsnyder586
XJ XJ8 / XJR ( X308 )
56
Dec 29, 2024 07:39 PM
aholbro1
XJ XJ6 / XJR6 ( X300 )
18
Dec 29, 2024 06:46 PM
mrsimpson
XF and XFR ( X250 )
2
Sep 15, 2015 01:10 PM
SeanU
XK / XKR ( X150 )
0
Sep 14, 2015 04:31 PM
doctordeuce
F-Type ( X152 )
1
Sep 12, 2015 08:30 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:44 AM.