XK / XKR ( X150 ) 2006 - 2014

Introduction

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 19, 2018 | 02:20 PM
  #1  
brinny's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,564
Likes: 474
From: Yorkshire U.K.
Default Introduction

Hi all, I’m a regular on the xjs forum and a previous owner of xk8 and xkr cars . Now I’m getting towards the end of my xjs restoration I’m looking more and more at the xk150 . I don’t think I need the xkr back in my life having scratched that itch and from what I’ve read the xk should suit me. I know I could research all the facts and figures but I always like to consider people’s 1st hand experiences. So specifically talking xk, are the early 4.2 ok or would you try for a 5.0? I’m fancying a coupe so is there any thing I should specifically look out for? I know it’s difficult as there are so many different things to consider but all input is gratefully received. Hope you all enjoy the holidays . Thanks bob
 
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2018 | 02:35 PM
  #2  
Brewtech's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,496
Likes: 630
From: LA
Default

Well, 5.0 is the latest with pretty updates and facelift, with built in weaknesses.
4.2 is the original design, and is pretty much bulletproof and has less built weakness.
Im into all XKs but prefer the front end in the facelift models, yet I also prefer the early cars for their originality. 4.2 is the easier one to live with, 5.0 is more power though
 
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2018 | 03:42 PM
  #3  
pwpacp's Avatar
Veteran Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 1,336
Likes: 551
From: Georgia
Default

I've owned both the 4.2l and 5.0. and would vote yes on any of the x150 model years. 2010 was the first year of the 5.0l but, by this point in time, any of them out there should have had any of the weakness points addressed already.

That said, I couldn't be happier with my '12 vert.
 
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2018 | 10:55 PM
  #4  
tberg's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 5,008
Likes: 2,622
From: Los Angeles
Default

Whether the XK or XKR, the leather dash is potentially an expensive issue with either. The leather becomes separated from the foam and frame since it was only glued not anchored with staples. The result is that many X150 owners have loose leather flappin' around or bubbles all around the dash. In comparison to the X100 (i have both), the X150 platform, especially the 5.0L cars, are head and shoulders more enjoyable to drive, more stable, more planted, handle and ride better, and is far more reliable. And the speed of the X150 XKR is explosive and intoxicating. Obviously, look for a car with a service history.
Good luck!
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2018 | 07:59 AM
  #5  
09XFSuper's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 434
Likes: 148
From: Charlotte, NC USA
Default

I recently sought out and purchased an ‘09 XKR Portfolio for the following reasons :
- 4.2 supercharged engine
- JGate shifter
- red stitching on the dark leather
- Shadow Gray color

The proven nature of the 4.2 combined with the supercharger gives the car all the power it needs. I personally think the JGate is much cooler than the later rotary knob. Red stitched leather, oh yeah, gotta have it! The color is exceptionally well suited to the XKR.
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2018 | 10:42 PM
  #6  
Brewtech's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,496
Likes: 630
From: LA
Default

Jgate does it for me!
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2018 | 11:41 PM
  #7  
ralphwg's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 4,959
Likes: 1,240
From: Los Angeles CA
Default

I would suggest you drive both before you make a decision. IMO the 5L is different better vehicle with one caveat. Be aware that the water pump has been an issue on the 5L. they tend to give out somewhere around 35k+ miles unless they have been updated with the latest design.
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2018 | 01:33 PM
  #8  
Mufc's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 315
Likes: 142
From: NC
Default

Even the new updated 5.0 water pumps fail. Just had mine replaced again, last updated one lasted all of 7000 miles. I had the prior pump changed at Jaguar and had a 1 year warranty so they replaced it free of charge. That being said, the 5.0 is a superior car dynamically. The only reason to get the 4.2 is because its cheaper to purchase.
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2018 | 05:11 PM
  #9  
AlexJag's Avatar
Sponsor
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 451
From: San Diego CA
Default

Just fyi , you can have just as much power out of 4.2 XKR as the stock 5.0, with basic bolt on and a proper tune. Speaking from experience
 
__________________
2008 XKR Convertible, (mods: AlphaJagTuning ECU Tune , 1.5lb pulley, (200cel cats( are now melted), xpipe, Bosch 001 pump, 180 Thermostat.
Drag strip : 7.9sec 1/8mi 90 MPH . 1/4 mile 12.55 at 112.98mph
432rwh Dyno on Mustang Dynometer , Approx 511 crank HP.
2013 XJ 5.0 SC (Alpha Jag ECU, TCU tune, crank pulley), 600+ HP, 11.6 sec 1/4th mi 122mph, 7.6sec 1/8th mi
2018 Jaguar F-Type (AlphaJag ECU TCU, lower upper pulleys intake) 10.77 ,131mph ,700hp
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2018 | 06:18 PM
  #10  
NBCat's Avatar
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 6,068
Likes: 2,983
From: Newport Beach, California
Default

I personally prefer the early, pre-facelift cars as the design is less cluttered. I also wanted the AJ133 for its proven reliability as the timing chain issues associated with the 4.0 litre unit in the X100 had been sorted.

As for maintenance and items to pay attention to:
  • Water outlet on the AJ133 is plastic and should be replaced as an assembly every time the coolant is changed.
  • The evaporator drain can become blocked causing water to accumulate in the RH front footwell. There are several fixes such as trimming the 'duckbill' to allow better drainage.
  • Battery condition and age as the X150 requires consistent current with a minimum of 12.6 volts or electrical 'gremlins' and random DTCs are the result.
  • Suspension bushes can perish and affect handling.
  • MoT advisories, if any on the vehicle you're considering.
I cannot comment on the cost of maintenance and repair as I perform all my own work on both my X150 and X200. Others may be able to advise.
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2018 | 06:19 PM
  #11  
NBCat's Avatar
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 6,068
Likes: 2,983
From: Newport Beach, California
Default

One additional item is the ZF 6HP26/28 gearbox, which should have a fluid change and new filter/pan every sixty thousand miles.
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2018 | 06:42 PM
  #12  
Zahmed1094's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 57
Likes: 4
Default

Did the water pump issue one also with the XK?
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2018 | 07:46 PM
  #13  
Stuart S's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 10,107
Likes: 7,118
From: Atlanta suburbs
Default

All Jaguar and Land Rover models with 5.0L engines (normally aspirated and supercharged) are prone to water pump failure. While anything mechanical can break, the water pump in the 4.2L engine has been far more reliable.

You worry too much about your new 2007 XK.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
StereoType R
New Member Area - Intro a MUST
5
Jun 3, 2008 07:59 PM
Jaguar XJ8 2000
New Member Area - Intro a MUST
5
May 30, 2008 10:34 AM
JaguarX
New Member Area - Intro a MUST
7
Feb 13, 2008 11:16 AM
ovalmark
New Member Area - Intro a MUST
7
Feb 8, 2008 09:38 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:10 PM.