XK / XKR ( X150 ) 2006 - 2014

Replaced coolant temperature sensor, now car won't start - RESOLVED

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 4, 2023 | 04:08 PM
  #1  
Biff Baxter's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
10 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 89
Likes: 56
From: Danville, CA
Default Replaced coolant temperature sensor, now car won't start - RESOLVED

2007 Jaguar XKR. The coolant temperature sensor at the top front of the engine is leaking. I went to replace it. It takes 1 or 2 minutes in total to complete the job.

With the new sensor in place, the car does not start. The starter spins endlessly. If I put the old one back in, the car starts right up. I have now been to two auto parts stores and tried two sensors. They both are from the brand “Standard” and they both have the part number TX104.

https://www.oreillyauto.com/detail/c...sor/std0/tx104

Both the old and the new sensor are push in, not screw in. Both the old and the new sensors look the same.

I searched the forum and did not see any reference to this problem.

Does anybody have any idea why my car won’t start with the new sensor?

Biff
 

Last edited by GGG; Nov 10, 2023 at 03:55 AM. Reason: Add "RESOLVED" to thread title
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2023 | 04:52 PM
  #2  
kj07xk's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 5,320
Likes: 2,596
From: Naperville, Illinois USA
Default

New sensor could be bad. Did you read the 1-star reviews on that site?


 
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2023 | 07:39 PM
  #3  
Biff Baxter's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
10 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 89
Likes: 56
From: Danville, CA
Default

Maybe. I got one from O'Reilly's and one from Monument Auto Parts. I was thinking the odds of getting two bad sensors was probably small.

BIff
 
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2023 | 11:12 PM
  #4  
kj07xk's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 5,320
Likes: 2,596
From: Naperville, Illinois USA
Default

With all three sensors on your work bench (so the ambient temp is the same for all), use an ohm meter and measure the resistance across the contacts on each, are they the same?
Guessing the new ones don’t match the original.
 
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2023 | 11:19 AM
  #5  
panthera999's Avatar
Senior Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 826
Likes: 684
Default

NTK also makes the sensor. Big name reliable brand. New one works on my '07 4.2.



 

Last edited by panthera999; Nov 5, 2023 at 11:42 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2023 | 11:27 AM
  #6  
McJag222's Avatar
Veteran Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 857
From: Vancouver BC
Default

I bought a spare from Jag - resistance was the same with both at ambient temp.
 
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2023 | 01:38 PM
  #7  
Biff Baxter's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
10 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 89
Likes: 56
From: Danville, CA
Default

panthera999, the part you are showing is screw in. Mine is push in.It turns out that the part listed by many auto parts stores is wrong (https://www.oreillyauto.com/detail/c...sor/std0/tx104). The contact prongs are shorter on the TX107, probably never complete the connection. The correct part number is AJ88655.

Thanks to everyone for all of the help.

Biff
 
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2023 | 02:40 PM
  #8  
sony2000's Avatar
Senior Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2023
Posts: 496
Likes: 163
From: Montreal, Canada
Default

Is it easily accessible? Is it near the thermostat. Is there a tool to slide under the rim, that will pry it up?
 
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2023 | 11:10 AM
  #9  
panthera999's Avatar
Senior Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 826
Likes: 684
Default

The only commonality (other than something being wrong with the ECU's interpretation of the temp signal) is the sensor ground point at PIS52. But I see that the sensor grounds also go back to the ECU, as well as chassis ground points.



 
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2023 | 08:10 AM
  #10  
JagV8's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 27,546
Likes: 4,923
From: Yorkshire, England
Default

Post #7 - it's fixed I think.
 
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2023 | 10:11 AM
  #11  
Biff Baxter's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
10 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 89
Likes: 56
From: Danville, CA
Default

Yes, it is fixed.
 
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2023 | 11:03 AM
  #12  
panthera999's Avatar
Senior Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 826
Likes: 684
Default

Originally Posted by Biff Baxter
Yes, it is fixed.
What was the fix? Another part, or something else?
 
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2023 | 06:10 PM
  #13  
Cee Jay's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 11,903
Likes: 6,415
From: Kaysville, Utah, US
Default

Originally Posted by panthera999
What was the fix? Another part, or something else?
Post #7 in this thread.
 
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2023 | 08:25 PM
  #14  
Biff Baxter's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
10 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 89
Likes: 56
From: Danville, CA
Default

Reposting the fix here.

It turns out that the part listed by many auto parts stores is wrong (https://www.oreillyauto.com/detail/c...sor/std0/tx104). The contact prongs are shorter on the TX107, probably never complete the connection. The correct part number is AJ88655.
 
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2023 | 04:02 AM
  #15  
GGG's Avatar
GGG
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 120,439
Likes: 17,014
From: Durham, UK
Default

Originally Posted by Biff Baxter
Reposting the fix here. .....
I've added RESOLVED to your thread title for the benefit of the disbelievers.

Many read the first post in a thread and then ignore subsequent replies before posting their own.

Graham
 
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2023 | 11:53 AM
  #16  
Tracee's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 226
Likes: 152
From: Sea Cliff, N.Y.
Default

A lot of the better You Tube mechanics have posted about "new-out-of-box" replacement parts not working. One guy - Diagnose Dan - scoped a circuit and found pulses present, but looking further, found data polarity reversed at the component. Proved by swapping the two wires with each other. This quality control issue seems to be on the rise; be vigilant about sourcing parts.
 
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2023 | 06:24 PM
  #17  
panthera999's Avatar
Senior Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 826
Likes: 684
Default

I was interested to know that the temp sensor was apparently in the start authorization sequence, along with the brake switch and the P/N transmission status etc. Didn't know that an unplugged temp sensor would prevent start.
 
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2023 | 07:50 PM
  #18  
Cee Jay's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 11,903
Likes: 6,415
From: Kaysville, Utah, US
Default

Originally Posted by panthera999
I was interested to know that the temp sensor was apparently in the start authorization sequence, along with the brake switch and the P/N transmission status etc. Didn't know that an unplugged temp sensor would prevent start.
Evidently that would make for a great Kill Switch to avoid theft.
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2025 | 04:41 PM
  #19  
V7Sport's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 542
Likes: 348
From: South County Rhode Island
Default

I know this thread is a couple years old, but I ran into this same issue with the ECT sensor replacement this Summer on my 2008 XKR. Thank goodness for the sharing of repair sagas by this forum's members.
I replaced most of the accessible coolant hoses (not the valley hoses) as they were 17 years old now. The ECT sensor ,although functional, was a bit of a loose fit in the thermostat housing manifold so replaced it to avoid a potential leak source. My local foreign car parts guy provided a Hella part number 6PT 009 309-781 which appeared identical to the old OEM part.
Good brand right?, so shouldn't be a problem.... WRONG! Engine would crank but not start. So now I'm chasing a some connection or wire that I broke or failed to connect during the cooling hose replacements. No obvious issue found, so looked to the forum for potential causes.
Hat's off to Biff Baxter's thread regarding the replacement ECT sensor problems. Put the original ECT sensor (with new Viton o-rings installed so now a snug fit in the thermostat manifold). Car started right up!!!
As Biff had mentioned a possible issue with the sensor electrical pin lengths not mating with the wire harness connector receptacles, I took a few measurements on the working original sensor and the non-working Hella part. See the attached picture with scribbled sketches. I did not measure the wire harness connector ,but a replacement sensor with connector measures similar to the original part might well work and be substantially cheaper than a Jaguar replacement sensor ($60 or so!). My original part part number in the picture is taken from the part and not the Jaguar P/N mentioned above..
Thanks again, Biff!

 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
93xjs6cyl
XJS ( X27 )
17
Oct 15, 2022 06:32 PM
Jagguyx300
XJ XJ6 / XJR6 ( X300 )
9
Jan 15, 2021 05:59 PM
pnhb93
X-Type ( X400 )
1
Nov 16, 2017 05:29 PM
wde86
XJ6 & XJ12 Series I, II & III
40
Jun 1, 2016 06:20 PM
srampaul
XK8 / XKR ( X100 )
1
Aug 26, 2010 10:53 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:03 AM.