XK / XKR ( X150 ) 2006 - 2014

Replacement Tires

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 22, 2016 | 07:38 AM
  #1  
finance1's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: Orlando
Default Replacement Tires

Hi All-

About a month ago, I purchased a '12 XK convertible (32K miles). Love the car! I need new tires on the front (the rears were replaced semi-recently and are in good shape).

On the tire rack website, I see a variety of options, mainly from the $160-$220 range, but with tread wear ratings (utqg) ranging from about 220 on the OE Pirelli P-Zero to 560 on Continental's (and 500 on Michelin Pilot's). All the tires are rated 4-stars (or better). The Jag is currently wearing Dunlop's. My question is, can I intelligently select the high-wear rated tires without losing material performance/handling? I live in Florida and will never encounter snow.

Thanks in advance!
 
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2016 | 07:55 AM
  #2  
richzak's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 3,294
Likes: 1,250
Default

Continental DWS Extreme Contact would be my choice.

I have a newer 2015 Corvette C7 and replaced the OEM Michelins with the DWS and the ride is smooth, quieter and the thread pattern is excellent for Florida driving, similar to New Mexico, only you have more rain.

..
 
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2016 | 07:56 AM
  #3  
jagtoes's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 5,209
Likes: 1,847
From: NY
Default

Tires have been discussed in many threads and with many opinions. You would need to determine how you want to drive the the car. All of the tires listed will perform well and some will perform better. Also some are smoother and quieter while others will give you a more firm ride . Wear is another factor as the fronts should last maybe twice as long as the rears. Next is what size wheel do you have (19's , 20's). The other consideration is mixing the fronts and rears. Now for me and some others I use my car (2012 XKR convert) for cruising and weekend trips. At 10K miles I got an un-repairable flat on a rear OEM Dunlop. I replaced both of them with Conti DWS tires. I noticed a considerable difference in the ride and noise . I also replaced the fronts after a few thousand miles with Conti DWS 06 after I got an alignment done. The results have been perfect for me. Ride quality in all categories have been improved and trips are enjoyable. I don't track the car and the performance of these tires are more than sufficient even if you do a little spirited driving . So I would suggest you listen to others when they respond and see what fits your driving style. Oh by the way I don't drive in the snow but do drive in the rain but Conti doesn't make a DW tire. Enjoy the ride
 
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2016 | 09:34 AM
  #4  
Tervuren's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 656
From: Carolinas
Default

If you're not to particular to get a nice razor sports car feel, the Continentals have a softer quieter build. Its a trade off not of peak grip quite, but response time. There will be a little more wander.

I went from Hancook Ventus V12 Evo 2's or whatever they were called, to the Continental DW(Not DWS). The soft compound grip is absolutely amazing, but the tire construction trades crispness for less booming and a quieter ride. For a daily, its worth it. For running twisty roads, its not.

Tires dry out with time, on a car not driven regularly, I do not see a reason to go with the harder compound tire. I'd want to replace the tire before I ran out of tread.

The ultimate in performance will be Michelin's, but they have a bad reputation to get rid of with tires falling apart in far too short of time. Maybe their current generation has fixed the issues, but its unknown to me. They're fantastic while they last.
 
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2016 | 12:50 PM
  #5  
finance1's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: Orlando
Default

Originally Posted by Tervuren
If you're not to particular to get a nice razor sports car feel, the Continentals have a softer quieter build. Its a trade off not of peak grip quite, but response time. There will be a little more wander.

I went from Hancook Ventus V12 Evo 2's or whatever they were called, to the Continental DW(Not DWS). The soft compound grip is absolutely amazing, but the tire construction trades crispness for less booming and a quieter ride. For a daily, its worth it. For running twisty roads, its not.

Tires dry out with time, on a car not driven regularly, I do not see a reason to go with the harder compound tire. I'd want to replace the tire before I ran out of tread.

The ultimate in performance will be Michelin's, but they have a bad reputation to get rid of with tires falling apart in far too short of time. Maybe their current generation has fixed the issues, but its unknown to me. They're fantastic while they last.
What is the difference (in ride, etc.) between the DW and DWS? The DWS is about $20 more but has a 65% higher tread life rating.

Most of my driving is not going to be spirited/performance.
 
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2016 | 12:52 PM
  #6  
finance1's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: Orlando
Default

Originally Posted by jagtoes
Tires have been discussed in many threads and with many opinions. You would need to determine how you want to drive the the car. All of the tires listed will perform well and some will perform better. Also some are smoother and quieter while others will give you a more firm ride . Wear is another factor as the fronts should last maybe twice as long as the rears. Next is what size wheel do you have (19's , 20's). The other consideration is mixing the fronts and rears. Now for me and some others I use my car (2012 XKR convert) for cruising and weekend trips. At 10K miles I got an un-repairable flat on a rear OEM Dunlop. I replaced both of them with Conti DWS tires. I noticed a considerable difference in the ride and noise . I also replaced the fronts after a few thousand miles with Conti DWS 06 after I got an alignment done. The results have been perfect for me. Ride quality in all categories have been improved and trips are enjoyable. I don't track the car and the performance of these tires are more than sufficient even if you do a little spirited driving . So I would suggest you listen to others when they respond and see what fits your driving style. Oh by the way I don't drive in the snow but do drive in the rain but Conti doesn't make a DW tire. Enjoy the ride
Thanks- Tire Rack has both DW and DWS for Continental. I'm glad you had a good experience.
 
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2016 | 01:03 PM
  #7  
elindo's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 231
Likes: 30
From: Central Virginia
Default

The Conti DWS is an excellent all around tire. It handles everything I can throw at them while retaining a very good ride (comfort). For the price, I say they are a no brainer. I think the new DWS is now the DWS 06...supposedly an improvement over the previous generation DWS. I absolutely love the DWS on the XK in particular.
 
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2016 | 06:43 PM
  #8  
Tervuren's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 656
From: Carolinas
Default

Originally Posted by finance1
What is the difference (in ride, etc.) between the DW and DWS? The DWS is about $20 more but has a 65% higher tread life rating.

Most of my driving is not going to be spirited/performance.
I have not had both to know. The DW has a less compromised tread for dry/wet . The DWS has additional cuts to help it bite into slush, but this does not help it in dry or wet conditions, and perhaps causes a little more noise.

The DW has two solid bands in the center without tread pattern. I have not yet had a really cold morning to see how much the compound hates it. I got them just as the weather was warming up this year. Tread wear rating, and possibly grip at lower temperatures are the shortfalls of the DW. I do not really care about tire replacement cycle so long as I make it past a year, two years is nice. I'm on 7 months and 7K miles so far.
 
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2016 | 07:46 PM
  #9  
pk4144's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 583
From: Los Angeles
Default

Just my opinion, but... the Continentals (Extreme Contact DWS 06). Period.
As to the question of which, apologies if I'm pointing out the obvious to all reading, but... the "S" is snow. DW = Dry/Wet DWS = Dry/Wet/Snow, so more all-season by design. Not sure if a DW is available on this particualr tire; I've got the DWS.
Having said that (and given that you're in Orlando)... I recently swapped out the original Dunlops on my car. Fronts still had some life, but I wasn't happy with them, so I got a whole new set, and after lots (LOTS) of reading the Contis seemed closest to what I wanted.
Amazingly smoother, quieter, more comfortable. It's like I have a new car. Went out on a winding highway (the Angeles Crest highway, my proving ground here in LA), and they were great. I can't recommend them enough.
If it makes a difference, this is my daily driver, so I'm looking at about 14K a year on the tires, and I've got 20" wheels. Might track the car but haven't yet, so that's not a priority.
 

Last edited by pk4144; Oct 22, 2016 at 08:09 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2016 | 08:39 PM
  #10  
finance1's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: Orlando
Default

Originally Posted by pk4144
Just my opinion, but... the Continentals (Extreme Contact DWS 06). Period.
As to the question of which, apologies if I'm pointing out the obvious to all reading, but... the "S" is snow. DW = Dry/Wet DWS = Dry/Wet/Snow, so more all-season by design. Not sure if a DW is available on this particualr tire; I've got the DWS.
Having said that (and given that you're in Orlando)... I recently swapped out the original Dunlops on my car. Fronts still had some life, but I wasn't happy with them, so I got a whole new set, and after lots (LOTS) of reading the Contis seemed closest to what I wanted.
Amazingly smoother, quieter, more comfortable. It's like I have a new car. Went out on a winding highway (the Angeles Crest highway, my proving ground here in LA), and they were great. I can't recommend them enough.
If it makes a difference, this is my daily driver, so I'm looking at about 14K a year on the tires, and I've got 20" wheels. Might track the car but haven't yet, so that's not a priority.
I think based on the forum and the expected treadwear the Continental's appear to be the choice.

Thanks to everyone for their comments!
 
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2016 | 09:55 PM
  #11  
kj07xk's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 5,313
Likes: 2,584
From: Naperville, Illinois USA
Default

Originally Posted by finance1
I think based on the forum and the expected treadwear the Continental's appear to be the choice.
That's the conclusion I came to as well, and have a set waiting to be mounted in 2 weeks (on 20" wheels that are going in for refinishing next week).
Hope we like them!
 
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2016 | 09:11 PM
  #12  
axr6's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,367
Likes: 601
From: California
Default

I have been very disappointed with the Conti DWS 06 tires on the XKR. I traded the original Dunlops after reading all the positive reviews on the DWS.

Grip is far inferior to the Dunlops and the sidewall is much softer, resulting in mushy handling and a definite loss of precision in the steering. After putting them on the car and doing the normal break-in procedures, I thought that something was wrong with the car. As I started pushing it harder through the tight, winding roads of my local canyons I kept noticing the traction control light flashing on all the time. The tires were loosing traction at speeds that even the old Dunlops were gripping just fine.

Yes, the ride quality had improved, except... I had to raise tire pressures to nearly 40 psi to regain some precision in the steering by stiffening up the sidewalls by the higher pressures. So, what I gained in ride improvements, I lost it back to the higher pressures. I would not purchase these tires again for any performance driving.
 
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2016 | 09:36 PM
  #13  
Sean W's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 8,933
Likes: 4,741
From: USA
Default

I currently have Potenza's on mine. I'm satisfied with them. Conveying your thoughts about tires is about as easy as describing what shade of red you prefer.

I've also had Pilots on an SV8 - didn't like them. Handled OK, not great. I'm hearing impaired and I thought they were too loud.

On this forum, Conti's seem to get the most up votes.
 
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2016 | 10:34 PM
  #14  
pk4144's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 583
From: Los Angeles
Default

Originally Posted by Sean W
Conveying your thoughts about tires is about as easy as describing what shade of red you prefer.
Ha! Perfectly put.
 
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2016 | 01:52 PM
  #15  
mosesbotbol's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 6,286
Likes: 1,208
From: Boston, USA
Default

Been digging the Pirelli P-Zero Nero's on my last two cars. Great performance and doesn't break the bank.
 
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2016 | 02:22 PM
  #16  
jagtoes's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 5,209
Likes: 1,847
From: NY
Default

Originally Posted by axr6
I have been very disappointed with the Conti DWS 06 tires on the XKR. I traded the original Dunlops after reading all the positive reviews on the DWS.

Grip is far inferior to the Dunlops and the sidewall is much softer, resulting in mushy handling and a definite loss of precision in the steering. After putting them on the car and doing the normal break-in procedures, I thought that something was wrong with the car. As I started pushing it harder through the tight, winding roads of my local canyons I kept noticing the traction control light flashing on all the time. The tires were loosing traction at speeds that even the old Dunlops were gripping just fine.

Yes, the ride quality had improved, except... I had to raise tire pressures to nearly 40 psi to regain some precision in the steering by stiffening up the sidewalls by the higher pressures. So, what I gained in ride improvements, I lost it back to the higher pressures. I would not purchase these tires again for any performance driving.
It seems your experience is exactly what the summary of Conti users have been . All of the post that I have seen talk to quiet , smooth and comfortable ride. None discussed performance as the main criteria. It has always been abut the ride and usually because the owners enjoyed either cruising or long drives. Other then being to old to challenge the twisties I would have not selected the Conti's if I were looking for performance. Then again maybe there aren't enough folks who are driving these cars that have performance tire recommendations. Maybe others with these needs could chime in here and give the form their feedback.
 
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2016 | 02:32 PM
  #17  
Rey's Avatar
Rey
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 449
Likes: 144
From: Salem, OR
Default

My two cents: Most Floridians will never experience a winding road other than freeway cloverleafs. Even the worst handling tire will handle quite well for the average driver. There are two factors I think are really important for Floridians: tire noise (which no one likes) and anti-hydroplaning. Florida can experience tropical downpours that really flood; and one needs the best rain tire out there to handle the unexpected.
TireRack is an excellent site for reviews; and it doesn't cost anything to talk with one of their sales reps.
 
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2016 | 02:49 PM
  #18  
mosesbotbol's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 6,286
Likes: 1,208
From: Boston, USA
Default

Originally Posted by Rey
Florida can experience tropical downpours that really flood; and one needs the best rain tire out there to handle the unexpected.
Bridgestone has some amazing rain tires like the S0* Pole Positions.
 
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:10 PM.