F-Type ( X152 ) 2014 - Onwards

F Type 2.0L - FAIL or FANTASTIC ?!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 9, 2017 | 01:28 PM
  #61  
Morgan52's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 135
Likes: 19
From: Brussels area
Default

Originally Posted by ek993
I don’t feel the 2.0 cheapens the brand etc as has been said, and I know it will make for a sweeter handling car - but... there’s only so much you can do with a 4 cylinder in terms of soundtrack. Exhausts can’t work miracles. The only decent sounding 4’s I have heard are flat 4’s in Subaru’s.
It's not the noise that makes the car!
 
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2017 | 01:52 PM
  #62  
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 16,948
Likes: 4,727
From: Maryland, US
Default

Originally Posted by Morgan52
It's not the noise that makes the car!
Maybe not entirely, but it's a huge part of the equation.
 
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2017 | 05:07 PM
  #63  
NBCat's Avatar
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 6,067
Likes: 2,982
From: Newport Beach, California
Default

Originally Posted by ek993
...there’s only so much you can do with a 4 cylinder in terms of soundtrack. Exhausts can’t work miracles. The only decent sounding 4’s I have heard are flat 4’s in Subaru’s.
What Subarus have a decent sound? Some of the boy-racer types here put different exhausts on them. Not very impressive, I'm afraid.
 
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2017 | 05:34 PM
  #64  
ek993's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 772
Likes: 183
From: CT
Default

Originally Posted by NBCat
What Subarus have a decent sound? Some of the boy-racer types here put different exhausts on them. Not very impressive, I'm afraid.
Subaru Impreza WRX - without boy racer exhaust (I hate those exhausts on any type of car). Has a rythmic thrum and warble due to engine configuration and firing order. For a four cylinder engine I thing it’s quite nice. Other four cylinders do not sound special in any way. Sure manufacturers are adding exhausts (Alfa 4C, Fiat Abarth etc) but it’s just a raucous rasping noise with some pops and bangs engineered in.

I have had some great 4 cylinder cars. MK2 Golf GTi 16V in late eighties, Porsche 944 Turbo and Lancia Delta Integrale (I grew up in UK) in early 90’s and the last 4 cylinder I had was a supercharged Lotus Elise just before moving to US around 9 years ago. The cars were great. The engines weren’t.

Someone posted earlier about engine note not making a car. I totally disagree, for me it’s a major part of the enjoyment and a big part of the reason I love my V8S, I never tire of the soundtrack. Part of the decision making process for my car buying is how it sounds. Best sounding car I have ever owned is an F355 back in the early 2000’s, what a sound.
 
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2017 | 05:47 PM
  #65  
NBCat's Avatar
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 6,067
Likes: 2,982
From: Newport Beach, California
Default

Originally Posted by ek993
Subaru Impreza WRX - without boy racer exhaust (I hate those exhausts on any type of car). Has a rythmic thrum and warble due to engine configuration and firing order. For a four cylinder engine I thing it’s quite nice...
I'll have to notice next time one goes by. I was never very impressed with Subaru; seems very much like the typical Japanese 'appliance' vehicle. I drove a manual version of the Toyota variant of their brz 'sports car' and it was definitely underwhelming in every respect.
 
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2017 | 10:27 PM
  #66  
BruceTheQuail's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 4,109
Likes: 1,396
From: Gold Coast, Oz
Default

My mother has a red manual Toyota 86, it isnt very quick at all, the seats pill, the speedo has 0 at about 5 oclock so you have to really look hard to see what speed you are doing, the clutch is weak, the gearbox notchy, and with the door style you have to open the doors right out to get in or out which makes it a pain, and the suspension is spongey.

That said, it sounds pretty good for a NA 4 and the steering is beautifully direct.
 
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2017 | 09:04 AM
  #67  
SinF's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 6,986
Likes: 2,157
From: Canada, eh
Default

Originally Posted by NBCat
What Subarus have a decent sound? Some of the boy-racer types here put different exhausts on them. Not very impressive, I'm afraid.
Again, I disagree. WRXs are rally cars. To fully appreciate one you have to take one fast on a gravel road. While you could take WRX on a track, it is not a track car.

Most Subarus are appliances, but not WRX.
 
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2017 | 11:22 AM
  #68  
Queen and Country's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 7,420
Likes: 2,394
From: Hastings
Default

Originally Posted by BruceTheQuail
My mother has a red manual Toyota 86, it isnt very quick at all, the seats pill, the speedo has 0 at about 5 oclock so you have to really look hard to see what speed you are doing, the clutch is weak, the gearbox notchy, and with the door style you have to open the doors right out to get in or out which makes it a pain, and the suspension is spongey.
Have a heart and at least get her some seat covers or bottle of car wax for Christmas mate.
 
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2017 | 11:51 AM
  #69  
NBCat's Avatar
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 6,067
Likes: 2,982
From: Newport Beach, California
Default

Originally Posted by SinF
Again, I disagree. WRXs are rally cars. To fully appreciate one you have to take one fast on a gravel road. While you could take WRX on a track, it is not a track car.

Most Subarus are appliances, but not WRX.
It is certainly your right to disagree as much as you'd like.

I was at the Honda test track in Marysville Ohio a while back watching Honda drivers and engineers evaluate a Subaru WRX. We were all underwhelmed even before the engine suffered catastrophic failure from a connecting rod coming through the block.
 
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2017 | 12:50 PM
  #70  
SinF's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 6,986
Likes: 2,157
From: Canada, eh
Default

Originally Posted by NBCat
I was at the Honda test track in Marysville Ohio a while back watching Honda drivers and engineers evaluate a Subaru WRX. We were all underwhelmed even before the engine suffered catastrophic failure from a connecting rod coming through the block.
This is like complaining that you took F-type offroading and ended up ripping transmission out.

I looked it up, and that track is one big paved oval. You probably ended up sucking air into sump during high speed sloped turns. Unless it was STI trim, WRX oil pan doesn't have sump design and baffles to survive this. Nor is this an issue in rally driving, where turns are short and sharp. The same design limitation applies to most Honda cars.

See relevant info on WRX pan here: http://www.superstreetonline.com/how...ystem-upgrade/

---

I owned both Hondas and Subarus. Aside from one-off gems like S2000, Honda only makes appliances. Subaru on other hand always offered performance cars in addition to standard offerings.
 

Last edited by SinF; Dec 10, 2017 at 01:03 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2017 | 01:07 PM
  #71  
NBCat's Avatar
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 6,067
Likes: 2,982
From: Newport Beach, California
Default

Originally Posted by SinF
I looked it up, and that track is one big paved oval. You probably ended up sucking air into sump during high speed sloped turns. Unless it was STI, oil pan doesn't have sump design and baffles to survive this. Nor is this an issue in rally driving, where turns are short and sharp. The same design limitation applies to most Honda cars.

See here: Subaru Oil System Upgrade - Import Tuner Magazine

This is like complaining that you took F-type offroading and ended up ripping transmission out.
The track was set up like a gymkhana-style with short quick turns and manoeuvres, not 'one big paved oval.'

Hopefully the Subaru engineers designed the sump deep enough and the oil pump pick up low enough that 'sucking air into sump during high speed sloped turns' is not possible.

I certainly would not buy a Subaru, nor drive a Jaguar of any type 'offroading' as you call it.

I hope the X152 2.0 litre is a success and brings more and younger buyers to the Jaguar brand despite it being a four cylinder car.
 
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2017 | 01:21 PM
  #72  
JagRag's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 292
From: Earth
Default

All the Design, R&D and factory tooling monies for the F-Type have been invested. Thus introducing the 2.0L will add only a minimal over-all cost factor and JLR will in turn get an up-tick of xx% in F-Type sales.
It's makes very good business sense from that perspective, as well as possibly getting younger, less affluent buyers into the brand. Over-all a very good business strategy to increase both market share and brand awareness.
 
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2017 | 02:58 PM
  #73  
Queen and Country's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 7,420
Likes: 2,394
From: Hastings
Default

In a bizarre way, the validity of the Ftype-4cyl is being addressed.
There is reality and there is delusion.
Buying a sports car for a gravel road is sheer delusional- Even in unpaved Africa you need massive oil sump, not a boxer engined sports car.

But nothing as sadistic at Bruce redlining mom's 86 Toyota 4-banger and complaining of a weak clutch.
 
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2017 | 03:13 PM
  #74  
BruceTheQuail's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 4,109
Likes: 1,396
From: Gold Coast, Oz
Default

true, though I'm gentle on that car compared to my mum. It positively bellows when she drives it away, and now she is wanting to put a spoiler on it for christmas!
 
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2017 | 09:11 PM
  #75  
uncheel's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 724
From: Chapel Hill, NC
Default

Rhymes with all hat; no cattle. If these become the mainstream F-Type, it would be a good excuse to move over to an Aston.
 
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2017 | 12:22 PM
  #76  
amcdonal86's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 6,290
Likes: 485
From: Arlington, VA USA
Default

After watching most of that video review, I think there are definite advantages to reducing the weight in the car with the 2.0L turbo engine. Most people here seem to be looking at it just from the standpoint of "cheapening" the brand. Is the 2.0 even that much cheaper than the old base V6???

I bet Jaguar would do better with a smaller 2-door roadster than the F-Type, to compete with the Miatas/Fiats on offer. This car could have more of a focus on handling and less on grunt, and built from the ground up with that in mind. F-Type seems to have been designed more to be able to handle a large V8 engine!
 

Last edited by amcdonal86; Dec 11, 2017 at 01:01 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2017 | 09:57 AM
  #77  
Burt Gummer's Avatar
Veteran Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 359
From: Portland OR
Default

Best to the point YT Comment by Lenad Johnson
2 weeks ago
This car is a beautiful girl with a terrible voice

80%+ of the videos you will find about the F-Type (S and R/SVR with dynamic exhaust) are about its amazing SOUND. Better to buy used if cost is the reason for going 2.0L (imo only).


 

Last edited by Burt Gummer; Dec 12, 2017 at 10:00 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2017 | 10:07 AM
  #78  
Queen and Country's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 7,420
Likes: 2,394
From: Hastings
Default

To some our fixation on exhaust sound is an evolved perversion, not unlike wanting our blue cheese to have more and more pungency resembling the same mold that grows between our toes. I do love my Stilton, however there are those who like Camembert.
 
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2017 | 10:11 AM
  #79  
Queen and Country's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 7,420
Likes: 2,394
From: Hastings
Default

Frankly its been a bit overdone these days with all the bloody civics and pickup trucks belonging to bubbas sounding like that. Its alright if you are trying to attract blokes. But with some birds it can stick out like a sore thumb in a world of Teslas.
 
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2017 | 10:18 AM
  #80  
buickfunnycar.com's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,924
Likes: 335
From: Monterey, CA
Default

Originally Posted by ek993
Subaru Impreza WRX - without boy racer exhaust (I hate those exhausts on any type of car). Has a rythmic thrum and warble due to engine configuration and firing order. For a four cylinder engine I thing it’s quite nice. Other four cylinders do not sound special in any way. Sure manufacturers are adding exhausts (Alfa 4C, Fiat Abarth etc) but it’s just a raucous rasping noise with some pops and bangs engineered in.

I have had some great 4 cylinder cars. MK2 Golf GTi 16V in late eighties, Porsche 944 Turbo and Lancia Delta Integrale (I grew up in UK) in early 90’s and the last 4 cylinder I had was a supercharged Lotus Elise just before moving to US around 9 years ago. The cars were great. The engines weren’t.

Someone posted earlier about engine note not making a car. I totally disagree, for me it’s a major part of the enjoyment and a big part of the reason I love my V8S, I never tire of the soundtrack. Part of the decision making process for my car buying is how it sounds. Best sounding car I have ever owned is an F355 back in the early 2000’s, what a sound.
Subaru's sound god awful...wouldn't own one strictly based on that alone.

Same with Vipers.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:42 AM.