XJ XJ6 / XJ8 / XJR ( X350 & X358 ) 2003 - 2009

Another Transmission Fluid Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 12, 2016 | 04:19 AM
  #41  
Box's Avatar
Box
Veteran Member
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 648
From: Up, Planet Earth
Default

Originally Posted by Don B
BTW, that kinematic viscosity at 40C of 26.8 is the lowest I've seen stated for Mercon SP. Most references specify 28 and at least one specifies a range of 28-32. Most of the Lifeguard 6 MSDS I've seen specify 26.8 with one or two specifying 28.
Since the Blackstone analysis of both fluids are so similar, I'm not sure 1 point is that relevant. Anyway, lines showed up yesterday, so I will attempt to get them installed this weekend.
 

Last edited by Box; Aug 12, 2016 at 08:23 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2016 | 05:08 PM
  #42  
Don B's Avatar
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 20,511
Likes: 15,282
From: Crossroads of America
Default

Originally Posted by WinterJag
Changed the fluid in the trans (and the pan) for both my SV8 and the wifes STR with Castrol Import multi-vehicle ATF (meets the right specs) at about $7 CDN per liter. My SV8 - been just over a year and about 20,000 kms, nothing but perfect operation. Wife's STR - changed about 4 years and 100,000kms ago, again, nothing but perfect, if not better, operation. Argue fluids makes all you want, to me, if it meets the specs, it'll work.

Hi WinterJag,

I know I sound pedantic on this subject, but according to the MSDS for Castrol Import Multi-Vehicle ATF, its kinematic viscosity at 40C is 35.57 mm2/s, or nearly 33% "thicker" than Shell M-1375.4/Lifeguard 6. The spec for LG6 is just 26.8 mm2/s, which is among the lowest viscosities of all commonly-available transmission fluids. I'm not sure how Castrol can get away with claiming their fluid "meets the right specs" when its viscosity is 33% higher than "the right spec."

Here's the Castrol MSDS:

http://msdspds.castrol.com/ussds/amersdsf.nsf/Files/9A4E918EE19C88CE80257D98000EEF5E/$File/BP%20GHS%20US%20SDS%20-%20US%20US-Lubes%20Americas-Castrol%20%28Wayne%2C%20NJ%20US%29467634-US12English%20%28US%29.pdf

When ZF first announced the 6HP26 in 2000, they stated that the new transmission was designed to be lighter and more fuel efficient compared to the 5-speed boxes it replaced, and that it was designed with "minimal tolerances," or the smallest possible clearances between moving parts. Using a fluid that is less flowable than specified by ZF could increase internal resistances and undermine the improved fuel economy the transmission was designed to promote. Even worse, it could lead to elevated internal pressures and temperatures and pose a risk of transmission damage over the long-term.

This is a good example of why I've become skeptical of the claims of third-party fluid makers/ marketers regarding the compatibility of their products in my Jags.

Cheers,

Don
 

Last edited by Don B; Aug 12, 2016 at 09:56 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2016 | 07:07 AM
  #43  
Partick the Cat's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,055
Likes: 307
From: Gloucestershire, England
Default

We've been through this all before. Mercon SP's viscocities are within 2% of LG6's, other's are way out. It's all in the file I attached to this post
 
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2016 | 12:16 PM
  #44  
WinterJag's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 477
Likes: 133
From: Butler, PA
Default

Don B

Well, it was supposed to meet the right specs! lol

Either way, as you can see, it's been in there for a long time with absolutely no ill effects, so it's obviously working. I don't know how much difference that 33% thicker really makes under normal driving conditions. Another thing I think has to be considered is the climate in which I live. These transmissions have to be able to work in temps from +50C to -50C, so I bet they can handle a wide range of viscosity (right or wrong, I would base that on my experience). While I have never measured it, I would bet there are times when my tranny fluid never gets above say 10 or 20 C if the car is on a short trip at -40C (yes, I have actually maxed out our external temp sensors, they only go to -40C). On the flip side, just the other week it was almost +40C. Another consideration is the age/mileage on the car. I bet with over 250,000kms on the clock, any changes in the fluid specs won't cause any more issues than the normal wear in the tranny. But this is just based on my thinking, which has been known to be a little crazy sometimes!

Now, when I did this the Castrol I used said in the spec sheets it met the shell M-1375.4 requirements, HOWEVER, that was the first time I used it years ago. When I changed my car last year, I never bothered to check the specs again, and I had noticed the back label had changed on the bottle. Maybe the fluid composition was altered or something since the first time I used it. Either way, it's in there, it's working fine. I'm not going to rush out and change out all my fluid now. What I will probably do now, based on this info, is use different stuff when I do the next drain and refill on the cars (wife's is due for it this fall).
 
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2016 | 12:29 PM
  #45  
Mac Allan's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,892
Likes: 982
From: California
Default

One other point to add to this, is that when I was researching whether Mercon SP was an alternative (not just for me, but all of us), was going through the archives of all the other car brand forums that also used the same ZF unit.

As you can imagine, this conversation has been had on all those forums multiple times. However, I went a step further and did extensive site searches for any evidence that anyone who had switched to Mercon SP ever suffered any ill effects. I couldn't find a single instance.

If you waste as much time as I did, you'll estimate that hundreds of people, if not thousands, have used Mercon SP in place of LG6 or the car maker labeled version. Logically, if there was *any* issue with the switch, it would have been reported by now.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
thedugger1
XJ6 & XJ12 Series I, II & III
5
Mar 20, 2016 10:02 AM
Shelorr
XK8 / XKR ( X100 )
4
Mar 9, 2016 08:46 PM
trav2010xf
XF and XFR ( X250 )
2
Mar 9, 2016 01:02 PM
klfong
XJ XJ6 / XJ8 / XJR ( X350 & X358 )
2
Mar 6, 2016 12:08 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:35 PM.