XJS ( X27 ) 1975 - 1996 3.6 4.0 5.3 6.0

V12 group44 heads project

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 27, 2016 | 03:21 PM
  #101  
FerrariGuy's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 257
Likes: 199
From: Columbia SC
Default

Originally Posted by xjr5006
Well its all down to cost and as Mr Davis (EX TWR Manager) said to me, where's your market!
I have brand new TWR head castings on the shelf and the problem is the cost of turning these into usable cylinder heads.
I'm getting there but I wont put my house into it!
I wonder if there are any 5 axis machines that can turn your heads into near-usable blanks in a single device. If each purchaser of the heads did not have to replicate that programming (if the heads came with a digital machine-work file) it would make purchase more bearable. I'm still hopeful with the advent of 3d printing that the cost of low-volume replica parts will continue to decline. Digital versions of a product might end up being more marketable than the physical item itself (especially if having said-items produced locally becomes more doable).

XJR5006, I assume when you mention £100K for top quality sand molds you're speaking of making them in the traditional methods. (I'm making some assumptions here about cost reduction, but what are your thoughts about the following example.) Reconstructing cylinder heads
 
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2016 | 04:50 PM
  #102  
Paul_59's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 832
Likes: 328
From: https://t.me/pump_upp
Default

Very interesting thread, posts from people with more experience and knowledge than me seem to be suggesting that costs are going to be astronomically large with the end result being improved volumetric efficiency via better cylinder filling from much larger ports, valves and camshaft timing / lift.

If more power and torque are being sought from V12 Jaguar engine my guess is this could be achieved less expensively via fitting modern turbocharger (extremely low lag), suitable charge intercooler with boost limited to 0.5bar (7psi approx).

Should with good map and larger fuel injector give easy 450 to 530bhp with massive usable torque throughout rev range to make superbly street friendly vehicle.
Upgraded transmission obviously needed.
 
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2016 | 05:08 PM
  #103  
Jonathan-W's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,858
Likes: 366
From: Pensacola Florida USA
Default

Originally Posted by ronbros
.

there is a small company in Australia that has a V12 LS design engine up and running, posted on a YT site!

also i think some one has one up in Seattle USA area, on the net with pix.

to add back in 2007, i was at a BIG vendor show in Orlando FL, and GM had an LS cylinder head V12, along with a V12 aluminm block!

and look up GMs sweet sixteen Cadillac concept car, LS 16 cylinder engine, and it runs, beautiful work,god knows what it cost!

so seems a lot of ideas and about the LS series engines!

they are really good engines , i have owned some , and my pix in my gallery, 1985 Buick Grand National, with LS3 in it, along with built 4L80E trans, 3.73 rear LSD.
the best thing is they are low cost to buy, along with many combination of parts!

we have locally a vette with the LT5 4cam engine, but truthfully its not very fast or exciting,(shame most people dont know what they are looking at).
I have a 1992 v12 XJS I have driven a 1992 ZR1 LT5 ... if the power key is not inserted... she only has 220HP.... with the power key inserted about 400 hp... depending on which year 385 or 405... and the revs you have to get it up there... redline is 7?00 7200 or 7500 it has been a few years 1999 or 2000. now if the vacuum pump is broken it does not matter if the key is in or not.... unless like one owner did at a meet and used his wife's breast pump to sub for the broken vacuum pump.... so he could drag race it at the meet... the vacuum system opens up the secondary intake system above 3500 rpm and then that half the engine and injectors do their job...
now the impression I got from driving the car properly warmed up with the power key in place was AWESOME!... a much better car than the new 427's and the new super charged one I have driven them too and they are not as refined... a scalpel compare to a 20 pound sledge hammer. the newer ones are designed to appeal to the tire burning masses... same with the high HP dodges... the xjs I have I am just sorting out and I am finding that is handles very well in spite of the 104k miles it has on it... it will handle better as I go through all the worn out areas and address them...
 

Last edited by Jonathan-W; Jul 27, 2016 at 05:12 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2016 | 08:29 PM
  #104  
ronbros's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 7,362
Likes: 1,241
From: Austin tx and Daytona FL.
Default

Originally Posted by FerrariGuy
I wonder if there are any 5 axis machines that can turn your heads into near-usable blanks in a single device. If each purchaser of the heads did not have to replicate that programming (if the heads came with a digital machine-work file) it would make purchase more bearable. I'm still hopeful with the advent of 3d printing that the cost of low-volume replica parts will continue to decline. Digital versions of a product might end up being more marketable than the physical item itself (especially if having said-items produced locally becomes more doable).

XJR5006, I assume when you mention £100K for top quality sand molds you're speaking of making them in the traditional methods. (I'm making some assumptions here about cost reduction, but what are your thoughts about the following example.) Reconstructing cylinder heads

i suppose anything can be done, if you have the money and time , plus mind set to complete a project!

only time will tell!

at the same ORLANDO vendor show back 2007, way back in a corner of the show hardly seen walking by, was this funny machine buzzing along ,back ans forth, doing something like i had never seen before.

i asked what is it , CHINESE guy said a 3D printer, it was making a plastic gear, and other small objects,, they had started a new company in China and came to show USA, but very few were interested.

i walked away and had no idea it would become an encredible new way of doing things(still dont know full potential), but it sure is coming!

i thought CAD/CNC was spaceage stuff, now look at the custom BILLET cylinder blocks being made, and endless new beautiful products!
 
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2016 | 09:18 PM
  #105  
Jonathan-W's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,858
Likes: 366
From: Pensacola Florida USA
Default

Originally Posted by ronbros
i suppose anything can be done, if you have the money and time , plus mind set to complete a project!

only time will tell!

at the same ORLANDO vendor show back 2007, way back in a corner of the show hardly seen walking by, was this funny machine buzzing along ,back ans forth, doing something like i had never seen before.

i asked what is it , CHINESE guy said a 3D printer, it was making a plastic gear, and other small objects,, they had started a new company in China and came to show USA, but very few were interested.

i walked away and had no idea it would become an encredible new way of doing things(still dont know full potential), but it sure is coming!

i thought CAD/CNC was spaceage stuff, now look at the custom BILLET cylinder blocks being made, and endless new beautiful products!
I personally have receive a cad file that can be used in a 3D printer to make a new sun visor clip for my convertible...
... and was used by the person would gave it to me to make one for his....
 

Last edited by Jonathan-W; Jul 27, 2016 at 09:49 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2016 | 07:27 AM
  #106  
xjr5006's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 183
Likes: 272
From: UK
Default

Some very interesting posts,
My lad has redesigned the race cam carriers and made a far better job than TWR ever did. Big statement that.
I now have a Le Mans engine to rebuild , mainly as I have the tooling and it needs new cam carriers etc and I have the parts; I am sure.
But and its a BIG but; I will be using castings from the original tooling, we have made boring jigs for the cam follower and made a CNC line boring machine for the caps and carrier. We have worked out what TWR did wrong and will machine the carriers correctly with vastly superior castings. I will not ,sadly, be using the new design at this time. Its all down to cost. Pattern making will be about £10K (we are working on this but thats the bottom line at the moment)
I cannot justify this cost and cannot recover it especially as I have something that although not as good is original and does the job.
Personally I find this sad.
We will however be remaking the Heidegger pumps; but folks will want the cheaper and less efficient US units like Weaver / Johnson et al.
Heads we can make and can /will redesign I have the original TWR drawings etc, later in the year BUT as Mr Davis said , where is the market. How do I even start to recover the costs?
Making files available? yes thought of that BUT what do you do when someone then sells on the files for 1/2 of what you were charging?
Its a problem.
We also cannot get away from the machining costs on heads; CNC on the ports is about £100 per port ish but there are 24!
But the other problem is the castings; if you have castings suitable for all inlet bore sizes you have a huge amount of material to remove if you go for the large ports. ie 36mm upto 42mm. This effectively almost doubles the porting costs even with CNC. Its a time thing. If you have the big ports cast in you loose the main market which is for the 'smaller' big ports. Would love to be able to print what was needed needing only light porting to clean up. Really fancy honeycomb structures for supports and to assist cooling in the waterways but the cost would be high AND the machining would still be needed. I am also told they dont last too long!!??
Machining the heads is also a huge job and we have found the original now old boys who did them. They will do new heads for a relative pocket money but its still well more than 4 figures per head and its not repeatable like on a CNC machine, but they will make changes to suit the castings if there are problems. Dont forget to factor in in the guides and seat too , make sure they are good ones as these engines deserve much better than engine recon stuff.
If you want to see where we are take a look here https://www.facebook.com/groups/1432458440324391/ really like the redesigned cam carrier vid on CAD Cam although my lad thinks its a bit corny. Cant upload the vid onto the forum , unless someone knows how?

couple of CAD cam renderings for your viewing,



 

Last edited by xjr5006; Jul 28, 2016 at 08:38 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2016 | 02:41 PM
  #107  
Paul_59's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 832
Likes: 328
From: https://t.me/pump_upp
Default

Fascinating stuff on the facebook site, if only my pocket were much deeper!
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2016 | 11:22 PM
  #108  
xjr5006's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 183
Likes: 272
From: UK
Default

Just a quick update on the problems with Jag/Group 44/TWR V12 heads and remaking them.
Seriously looking at a new method where I can design and make individual pairs of heads, port size designed in, not made with so much metal you can cut the ports to what you want, cast to what is required with a deigned in wall thickness. This can be different from one pair to another. Gonna take quite a while, its got to slot in behind 3 very special engines I have to rebuild, I say rebuild but the 1st one is so bad it may be more correct to call it build!
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2016 | 06:00 AM
  #109  
superchargedtr6's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,078
Likes: 398
From: Greer SC
Default

Long live the Jag V12. They may not be the best engine one could use to make power, but for those of us who love mechanical things, the Jag V12 is maybe as big a draw to us crazies as good bait is to a fish. Once hooked, its hard to get away, lol.
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2016 | 02:57 PM
  #110  
ronbros's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 7,362
Likes: 1,241
From: Austin tx and Daytona FL.
Default

speaking about V12 engines , check out LSV12.com

totally amazing this new age casting and machining!
 
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2016 | 02:53 PM
  #111  
daddycool454's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 61
Likes: 43
From: Sydney Australia
Default yes they are expensive

V12 on hold atm. just rebuilding the 496BBC for my boat. even though everything is ex us for this motor its sooo much cheaper than my costings for the V12. Still going to embark upon the project but soooo many things to pay for not enough coming in...
finish the boat, get some summer enjoymenthave a look at the Jaguar again mid to late next year.
Love the renderings xjr5006 your boy is talented... still want to talk to you re your manifolds and cam carriers... will call after christmas. They keep deleting my facebook accounts which annoys me to no end...so ill call you when time and resources allow...
 
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2016 | 06:18 PM
  #112  
ronbros's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 7,362
Likes: 1,241
From: Austin tx and Daytona FL.
Default

Originally Posted by ronbros
speaking about V12 engines , check out LSV12.com

totally amazing this new age casting and machining!
.

correction; V12LS.com
 
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2016 | 10:53 PM
  #113  
Jonathan-W's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,858
Likes: 366
From: Pensacola Florida USA
Default

Originally Posted by ronbros
.

correction; V12LS.com
kool deal as the other was kind of iffy...
 
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2017 | 12:29 AM
  #114  
xjr5006's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 183
Likes: 272
From: UK
Default

Well at the risk of resurrecting an old post we have decided to go the new CAD head route. The why is very simple; with proper port flowing to TWR works spec going to cost £1800 per head + the initial cost of a program to do the work we have managed to find a route to make new heads with ports custom manufactured to what a customer wants, No machining just a nice run over with flap wheels and extension shafts. With this goes the chance to re design the waterways inside the head to increase surface area and hence cooling. We are also looking at water flow analysis to get those 6 outlets made to balance flow along the head; I am working towards removing the possibility of entrapping air inside the heads by design rather than having additional bleed pipes to clear such hot spots, we shall see if this is possible as the project develops.
One thing is apparent, the head construction is not so very well thought out, we have copied the original design but now will have to re do this having realized how poor the water system actually is.
Pics to follow.
 

Last edited by xjr5006; Dec 30, 2017 at 12:31 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2017 | 12:40 AM
  #115  
Jagboi64's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,250
Likes: 3,509
From: Calgary, Canada
Default

I assume the TWR heads were based on the original flat head design, not from a clean sheet?
 
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2017 | 02:09 AM
  #116  
Greg in France's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 14,567
Likes: 10,757
From: France
Default

Originally Posted by Jagboi64
I assume the TWR heads were based on the original flat head design, not from a clean sheet?
In the ETCC racing winning TWR XJS yes. I do not know about the Le Mans cars' engines.
 
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2017 | 02:10 AM
  #117  
Greg in France's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 14,567
Likes: 10,757
From: France
Default

Originally Posted by xjr5006
Well at the risk of resurrecting an old post we have decided to go the new CAD head route. The why is very simple; with proper port flowing to TWR works spec going to cost £1800 per head + the initial cost of a program to do the work we have managed to find a route to make new heads with ports custom manufactured to what a customer wants, No machining just a nice run over with flap wheels and extension shafts. With this goes the chance to re design the waterways inside the head to increase surface area and hence cooling. We are also looking at water flow analysis to get those 6 outlets made to balance flow along the head; I am working towards removing the possibility of entrapping air inside the heads by design rather than having additional bleed pipes to clear such hot spots, we shall see if this is possible as the project develops.
One thing is apparent, the head construction is not so very well thought out, we have copied the original design but now will have to re do this having realized how poor the water system actually is.
Pics to follow.
Great news, I do hope you get there. Please keep us up to date.
 
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2017 | 07:17 AM
  #118  
LongJohn's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 190
Likes: 49
From: Houston
Default

Wow that’s exciting news. Any idea of the price?

Originally Posted by xjr5006
Well at the risk of resurrecting an old post we have decided to go the new CAD head route. The why is very simple; with proper port flowing to TWR works spec going to cost £1800 per head + the initial cost of a program to do the work we have managed to find a route to make new heads with ports custom manufactured to what a customer wants, No machining just a nice run over with flap wheels and extension shafts. With this goes the chance to re design the waterways inside the head to increase surface area and hence cooling. We are also looking at water flow analysis to get those 6 outlets made to balance flow along the head; I am working towards removing the possibility of entrapping air inside the heads by design rather than having additional bleed pipes to clear such hot spots, we shall see if this is possible as the project develops.
One thing is apparent, the head construction is not so very well thought out, we have copied the original design but now will have to re do this having realized how poor the water system actually is.
Pics to follow.
 
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2017 | 08:03 PM
  #119  
ronbros's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 7,362
Likes: 1,241
From: Austin tx and Daytona FL.
Default

could make a nice steam engine, built in steam boiler! NOPE.

just a thought,, LOL.LOL.
 
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2017 | 09:56 PM
  #120  
fat_cat's Avatar
Member
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 96
Likes: 12
From: ontario
Default

What are the max ratings of the stock pre he heads? What rpm does it run out of air stock vs porting? How much could it handle with stiffer springs? Could you get 400hp? 500hp?

I would be interested in something more of this nature. I don't think many people are looking for the full race 700hp engine. But if we could see a 450hp motor on stock heads that are modified I think that a lot more people would be interested in that no?
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:27 PM.