What Superchargers came on what cars?
I was just wondering what the different series of superchargers came on various jaguars, from the first xjr in 95 with the inline 6, then with the 4.0, then the 4.2, and finally with the 5.0. Does anyone know each code name for each supercharger that was fitted with each engine?
I was just wondering what the different series of superchargers came on various jaguars, from the first xjr in 95 with the inline 6, then with the 4.0, then the 4.2, and finally with the 5.0. Does anyone know each code name for each supercharger that was fitted with each engine?
The latest 5.0L Jaguar V8 (AJ133) engine is a completely different engine from the 4.0L and 4.2L V8 engines. It uses the latest TVS (Twin Vortices Series) generation of spuerchargers from Eaton. The capacity of these superchargers is expressed in cubic centimeteres, unlike the capacity of the M series superchargers which is expressed in cubic inches.
while i'm asking;; somebody said to me you can put M112 rotors in an M90 casing, is that possible, and would it pump more air??
Trending Topics
M90 and M112 superchargers have the same design of rotors (same number of lobes and helix angle). The M112 rotors are 24.4% longer than M90 rotors. M112 rotors would probably fit inside an M90 casting, in terms of the centre distance between the rotors, but they would be far too long for the casing. If you look at an M90 and M112 supercharger they have the same cross-section (perpendicular to the rotor axes). An M90 has a 90 cubic inch (1,475cc) displacement per supercharger revolution and an M112 supercharger has a 112 cubic inch (1835cc) displacement. According to www.superchargersonline.com, the 5.0L Jaguar V8 (AJ133) engine uses an Eaton TVS R1900 supercharger. This would have a displacement of 1900cc.
Jko, theory says one revolution of the blower, would double the air into the engine(1900cc), so theory says it would double the power!
of course it dont quite work out that way in the real world, but if you did do it , you would have some serious power.
of course it dont quite work out that way in the real world, but if you did do it , you would have some serious power.
M90 and M112 superchargers have the same design of rotors (same number of lobes and helix angle). The M112 rotors are 24.4% longer than M90 rotors. M112 rotors would probably fit inside an M90 casting, in terms of the centre distance between the rotors, but they would be far too long for the casing. If you look at an M90 and M112 supercharger they have the same cross-section (perpendicular to the rotor axes). An M90 has a 90 cubic inch (1,475cc) displacement per supercharger revolution and an M112 supercharger has a 112 cubic inch (1835cc) displacement. According to www.superchargersonline.com, the 5.0L Jaguar V8 (AJ133) engine uses an Eaton TVS R1900 supercharger. This would have a displacement of 1900cc.
I was a Jaguar engineer too, involved in the development of the AJ26/27 , AJ33/4/6 and the AJ133 type at Whitley.
The M90 was also tried for a variant prototype of the AJ35 ( was going to be fitted in the Lincoln) for about 320 Bhp but this was canned.
This unit was also tested in the 3 litre JV6 for the X type "R" which was unfortunately cancelled too as was the X600 sports car.
The X type R would have been quite a machine.
The M90 was also tried for a variant prototype of the AJ35 ( was going to be fitted in the Lincoln) for about 320 Bhp but this was canned.
This unit was also tested in the 3 litre JV6 for the X type "R" which was unfortunately cancelled too as was the X600 sports car.
The X type R would have been quite a machine.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FS[SouthEast]: 2005 Jaguar XKR Convertible Supercharged
divingmom
PRIVATE For Sale / Trade or Buy Classifieds
0
Aug 25, 2015 07:54 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)









