XJ XJ8 / XJR ( X308 ) 1997 - 2003

Fuel trim/MAF interpretations...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 17, 2016 | 09:39 AM
  #1  
harvest14's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Veteran Member
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,386
Likes: 370
From: Virginia
Default Fuel trim/MAF interpretations...

I haven't posted a question in quite some time, I have just been DRIVING a lot! So great to just enjoy the car after a busy Summer last year of maintenance and upgrades. I would however like reactions from some seasoned members (or anyone really) regarding a fuel trim/MAF issue.

A few months ago I replaced my MAF with one from a salvage yard car. The old one was giving me high positive readings (+15 to +25) on acceleration while fuel trims at idle were near perfect. The new one gives me slightly high fuel trims at idle (+5 to +12) and near perfect fuel trims at speed and during acceleration. Car runs and idles fine with either MAF. What should I make of this? The fuel trims I am referring to are all short term. The long term with either MAF seem to stay between 0 and +5.

I am revisiting this issue because of a small issue with a noise at certain RPM. It may be nothing but I am in the mood for a little "car repair therapy", as my wife calls it.

Thanks
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2016 | 09:46 AM
  #2  
Jhartz's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 3,791
Likes: 1,069
From: Virginia beach va
Default

Sounds like the old MAF is spot on.

I see Short term trim sitting at zero and bouncing +/- a few percent, Long term sitting at near zero or +1.6 - +4.7, but both sides the same. Depending on temperature, short term will move rich under acceleration and drop back to near zero at idle. At constant 2500 RPM, on the road, Long terms close to zero, or slightly rich (+), short terms slightly lean (-).
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2016 | 09:53 AM
  #3  
harvest14's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Veteran Member
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,386
Likes: 370
From: Virginia
Default

Thanks. I'm going to switch back to the old one for a few days and see if I notice any changes. It seems to me I had trouble with all of the readiness codes clearing with the old one, whereas when I installed the newer one I got P1111 very quickly.

I really want to perform a smoke test to be sure there are not significant leaks. While this seems simple in theory, I have not yet found a practical approach. The only local mechanic I go to (which is rare) will NOT do anything to a Jaguar, not even a smoke test. He performed the test on my BMW without complaint, but won't touch the Jag.

P.S. -- Just ordered new rotors and pads yesterday; very excited about doing that work next week. Unrelated, I know....
 

Last edited by harvest14; Feb 17, 2016 at 09:57 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2016 | 10:19 AM
  #4  
Jhartz's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 3,791
Likes: 1,069
From: Virginia beach va
Default

It is possible the old MAF may have other issues. Maybe, try cleaning the new one, tighten up all connections along the air tube and see how it runs. Torque the bolts on the cam cover, as well. Check the seal on the dip stick if the left bank is running rich.

One of the guys also recommended using carburetor cleaner along any possible source of air ingestion (along the intake manifold, etc). When the idle stumbles, you found your weak point. But if the long term trim is just slightly positive, you may not have a problem.

Best of luck in getting the old rotors off: worked my *** off until my 265 # son shows up with a BFH, slowly turning the rotor and hitting it hard enough to break the rust seal. Left side came off much quicker, went to the big hammer sooner.
 

Last edited by Jhartz; Feb 17, 2016 at 10:23 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2016 | 04:44 PM
  #5  
harvest14's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Veteran Member
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,386
Likes: 370
From: Virginia
Default

Well, even though I cleaned the MAF from the salvage yard before I installed it a few months ago, I cleaned it again today and re-installed it. The fuel trims seemed much improved with all four hovering within 2 or 3 of zero. When I let off the gas and coast the short term fuel trims go briefly to between -5 and -18, but settle quickly back to around zero. I will keep an eye on the fuel trims for a few days, but it seems that Jim's simple recommendation to clean the MAF may have been timely advice.

I will keep a large hammer available during the brake job (maybe I'll borrow Thor's?). The last time the brakes were done was by the Jaguar dealer, but I think that was at least 5 years ago because the previous owner did not drive the car very much. We'll see soon enough whether or not the rotors put up a fight. I ordered Akebono ceramic pads and Centric (preferred?) rotors. I'm going to bleed new fluid throughout the system also. Off topic again.... oh well.
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2016 | 05:06 PM
  #6  
sparkenzap's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,502
Likes: 1,068
From: atlanta ga
Default

You do not need "significant" leaks to muck up the idle fuel trim!
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2016 | 05:42 PM
  #7  
harvest14's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Veteran Member
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,386
Likes: 370
From: Virginia
Default

True about small leaks causing issues...

That's why I would love to find a local shop/friend to smoke test my car; OR - find a good used/homemade unit fairly cheap that I can add to my tool collection.
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2016 | 09:13 PM
  #8  
ericjansen's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 3,256
Likes: 1,371
From: Taiwan, R.O.C.
Default

Originally Posted by sparkenzap
You do not need "significant" leaks to muck up the idle fuel trim!
I had a small leak where the intake tube connects to the MAF housing (the place with the large clamp).

I took the cover of the intake housing loose, then first fitted the intake tube well onto the MAF, tightened the clamp, then lowered the cover and closed it.

My LTFT's now hoover around zero after cleaning the MAF, and refitting the intake as described.
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2016 | 09:23 PM
  #9  
sparkenzap's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,502
Likes: 1,068
From: atlanta ga
Default

Originally Posted by harvest14
True about small leaks causing issues...

That's why I would love to find a local shop/friend to smoke test my car; OR - find a good used/homemade unit fairly cheap that I can add to my tool collection.
Or drive down to Atlanta and use mine!
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2016 | 01:52 AM
  #10  
JagV8's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 27,522
Likes: 4,911
From: Yorkshire, England
Default

On cars (but never had an XJ) I've found tiny sprays near a leaking hose have made short trims go crazy thus identifying the leak.

There may be hoses you can't get to, though.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Nookpad
S-Type / S type R Supercharged V8 ( X200 )
8
Mar 1, 2016 09:28 PM
MrBW
XF and XFR ( X250 )
12
Feb 11, 2016 08:40 AM
GROrndorff
MKI / MKII S type 240 340 & Daimler
4
Feb 5, 2016 01:09 PM
michaelodonnell123
XK / XKR ( X150 )
2
Feb 5, 2016 07:19 AM
Softball60
XJS ( X27 )
0
Jan 31, 2016 01:51 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:46 AM.