XJS ( X27 ) 1975 - 1996 3.6 4.0 5.3 6.0

Rear Camber Adjustment - rear Shims

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 6, 2015 | 10:03 PM
  #41  
warrjon's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 4,638
Likes: 2,583
From: Vic Australia
Default

Originally Posted by hoodun
mechanical engineers recommend "not going over 3, but 4 should be ok". anything more and they start to have concerns over movement.
Correct, too many shims and they can act as a bearing surface and slip. The lease number of shims the better.
 
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2015 | 05:29 PM
  #42  
hoodun's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 398
Likes: 61
From: San Francisco
Default

Originally Posted by Greg in France
As Warrjon says, you MUST buy the proper shins from Jaguar. They are expensive but are essential and safety critical. If you look at the link Doug gave above, they are actually called driveshaft spacers and come in thicknesses from 3.5 to 7mm.


Also buy new metloc nuts for the driveshafts from Jaguar. These are "one trip" items. Use the old ones for the trial end error, and replace with the new ones once you have it right.
Part number 31 in this link
Final Drive Unit Components - Parts For XJS from (V)179737 to (V)226645 | Jaguar Heritage Parts UK

I cant find the torque for these nuts? They were certainly on there tight... Does anyone have torque info?

So far, this job is not nearly as hard as I thought it would be.
 
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2015 | 02:24 AM
  #43  
Greg in France's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 14,598
Likes: 10,793
From: France
Default

Drive unit to driveshaft: 55 ft lbs, according to my Jaguar Repair Operation manual. But really tight is the thing!
Greg
 
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2015 | 12:52 PM
  #44  
plums's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 9,733
Likes: 2,202
From: on-the-edge
Default

Originally Posted by Greg in France
If you are considering using (say) 30 thin shims in place of one proper spacer would be a very unwise and I would think dangerous considering the forces involved. I strongly believe that a thick stack of thin shims would not be safe to use in place of a single spacer (or at most two spacers if needed, as max spacer thickness available is 7mm I think).
Agreed.

The mating flanges have registration rings which mate to the inside
diameter of the spacers. This is much like the hub centric arrangement
of the wheel/hub inteface in that it locates the assembly concentrically
and takes the load.

Using a stack of shims would not achieve the same function.

Given the arrangement, it would still be reasonably safe to use the
following arrangement if 7.5mm is not thick enough:

flange:shim:spacer:shim:flange

as there will still be most of the concentric flange mating to locate
the load

The thickest spacer listed is 7.5mm.

The dry torque figure for the same nut in JTIS for the X308 is 81NM to 99NM,
or 75 ft/lb and call it a day.

pro tip: the bolt pattern on the flange is arranged as a rectangle, not a square.
if you have a problem getting the bolts lined up, rotate 90 degrees. found this
out the hard way last month

the X308 is much more awkward in terms of access to the flange nuts due to
the use of a larger u-joint resulting in greater shrouding of the access path
 
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2015 | 02:22 PM
  #45  
JagCad's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 6,796
Likes: 2,403
From: Walnut Creek, California
Default

My .01. Not up to .02 value here.


The pictured IRS seems to be either one for an e type or is heavily modified for a
non Jag application,. Nice picture and nice work.


A tube full of water aka manometer is slick gear. I've seen the technique used to determine the level or lack thereof of a building floor.


I have one for other uses, not by me, ion m y tool collection.


My son uses a version on his flow bench.


The two floor tile idea is neat. I get it. Slick sides with wax or oil facing each other.
Sticky sides, one to the floor and one to the tire. Now, the tire under a bit of loads can be slightly manipulated in camber and toe!!!


Alignment shops use the principle with specialized pads.


I just hope the lower arm isn't bent.


Yup, the shaft flange to differential relies on friction. Washers alone would provide much ;less and the fastener's load n shear would increase dramatically.


Same principle as wheel spacers. Gotta fit, just right, or.....


Off to watch TV football, two local teams to day.


Chores done. Messed with tool restification. Prep for water heater swap out commenced.


Carl
 
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2015 | 02:50 PM
  #46  
motorcarman's Avatar
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 13,699
Likes: 9,645
From: Wise County,TX
Default

Please be aware that the nuts that hold the halfshaft to the diff output flange are 11/16" AF.....THEY ARE NOT METRIC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Some people pound a 17mm socket onto the nuts but they are English Measurement 11/16" 'across the flats'.

I use a 6 point thin wall chrome socket that is SCARRED from years of use for this purpose. The outside of the socket will contact the 'U'joint flange. Impact sockets are too thick.

bob gauff
 
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2015 | 05:19 PM
  #47  
plums's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 9,733
Likes: 2,202
From: on-the-edge
Default

Originally Posted by motorcarman
Please be aware that the nuts that hold the halfshaft to the diff output flange are 11/16" AF.....THEY ARE NOT METRIC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Some people pound a 17mm socket onto the nuts but they are English Measurement 11/16" 'across the flats'.

I use a 6 point thin wall chrome socket that is SCARRED from years of use for this purpose. The outside of the socket will contact the 'U'joint flange. Impact sockets are too thick.

bob gauff
There were a couple on mine where even thin wall sockets would not work.

Many on/off cycles with a box end. 11/16 of course
 
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2015 | 07:53 PM
  #48  
hoodun's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 398
Likes: 61
From: San Francisco
Default

I discovered the 11/16" thing just in time after nearly stripping the nut. I managed to get it off with no issues using an 11/16" socket. I had to turn the wheel to get the appropriate amount of space to fit the socket in there. I used a slim but standard 11/16" socket.
 
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2015 | 03:09 AM
  #49  
hoodun's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 398
Likes: 61
From: San Francisco
Default

plums, would 2 shims on one side and 1 on the other be relatively safe? Thats what its going to take...

I think my success with the socket was using this recessed 11/16":
 
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2015 | 06:18 AM
  #50  
Greg in France's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 14,598
Likes: 10,793
From: France
Default

2 and 1 would be fine as long as the locating ring can still locate. Mine came from the factory like that!


Greg
 
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2015 | 07:30 PM
  #51  
hoodun's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 398
Likes: 61
From: San Francisco
Default

It looks like I am not going to make .5 degrees. Its going to be more like -1.2. I still have to lower it to know for sure but its at about -.7, -.8 up on the jack.

Is this going to be an issue. Will have to order the larger spacers? They an 8mm. I'd rather not go through the hassle. I also read somewhere that sometimes negative camber is increased on purpose. It is actually a mod for the xjs. I have the sport rack bushings. Could it be they intentionally made all that neg camber? Its much much better now even though it will not be at -.5 ...
 
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2015 | 10:37 PM
  #52  
baxtor's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,122
Likes: 1,381
From: Australia
Default

Originally Posted by hoodun
It looks like I am not going to make .5 degrees. Its going to be more like -1.2. I still have to lower it to know for sure but its at about -.7, -.8 up on the jack.

Is this going to be an issue. Will have to order the larger spacers? They an 8mm. I'd rather not go through the hassle. I also read somewhere that sometimes negative camber is increased on purpose. It is actually a mod for the xjs. I have the sport rack bushings. Could it be they intentionally made all that neg camber? Its much much better now even though it will not be at -.5 ...
Rear camber for xjrs is listed as -1.3 degrees anyway (rather than the .5 for xjs) according to tech bulletin 60-5 so l would be inclined to set it at that.
 
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2015 | 02:55 AM
  #53  
hoodun's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 398
Likes: 61
From: San Francisco
Default

Originally Posted by baxtor
Rear camber for xjrs is listed as -1.3 degrees anyway (rather than the .5 for xjs) according to tech bulletin 60-5 so l would be inclined to set it at that.
great. Im sitting right about there. It drives much better especially in turns. It was originally at about -4 -5 degrees. It was just eating tires.
 
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2016 | 06:35 PM
  #54  
dtony's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 137
Likes: 21
From: Albuquerque, NM
Default

HI Guys,

I was reading your forum and something jumped out at me. I have recently purchased a 94 XJS (possibly an Insignia Edition) and the back tired were eaten down to the chords nearly on the inside of the tires. I put some used ones on the back just figuring the car had set around and wasn't very well maintained.

In driving around town I have been hearing a noise in what I thought was the passenger side rear hub area. I thought that my brakes were maybe catching and not releasing or the hand brake was not fully disengaged. I took i to a shop to day and they showed me that driver side rear tire rocks a bit in and out. The otherside does not.

Could this be a sign of a missing spacer? Could this also be the source of the noise?

Any help is much appreciated.

Tony in NM
 
Reply
Old May 15, 2019 | 10:15 AM
  #55  
Steve274's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 146
Likes: 51
From: Martin, TN
Default

SHIMS?
I have a shop that is making them for me.
let me know the mm you need. $75 per shim plus shipping.
Steve
 
Reply
Old May 15, 2019 | 12:51 PM
  #56  
Greg in France's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 14,598
Likes: 10,793
From: France
Default

Originally Posted by dtony
HI Guys,

I was reading your forum and something jumped out at me. I have recently purchased a 94 XJS (possibly an Insignia Edition) and the back tired were eaten down to the chords nearly on the inside of the tires. I put some used ones on the back just figuring the car had set around and wasn't very well maintained.

In driving around town I have been hearing a noise in what I thought was the passenger side rear hub area. I thought that my brakes were maybe catching and not releasing or the hand brake was not fully disengaged. I took i to a shop to day and they showed me that driver side rear tire rocks a bit in and out. The otherside does not.

Could this be a sign of a missing spacer? Could this also be the source of the noise?

Any help is much appreciated.

Tony in NM
No, it is a sign of a failed hub bearing or a failed differential output shaft or similar, or loose wheelnuts! Even with no shims or 10 shims the wheel should not be loose.
 
Reply
Old May 15, 2019 | 09:01 PM
  #57  
purrkittypurr's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 52
Likes: 26
From: Las Vegas
Default

Originally Posted by dtony
HI Guys,

I was reading your forum and something jumped out at me. I have recently purchased a 94 XJS (possibly an Insignia Edition) and the back tired were eaten down to the chords nearly on the inside of the tires. I put some used ones on the back just figuring the car had set around and wasn't very well maintained.

In driving around town I have been hearing a noise in what I thought was the passenger side rear hub area. I thought that my brakes were maybe catching and not releasing or the hand brake was not fully disengaged. I took i to a shop to day and they showed me that driver side rear tire rocks a bit in and out. The otherside does not.

Could this be a sign of a missing spacer? Could this also be the source of the noise?

Any help is much appreciated.

Tony in NM
I second Greg's comment. Had the same symptoms you've described above. Somebody before me tried to fix it, replaced the castellated nut with a metric front wheel drive hub nut, buggered the threads in the process and did not put back the hub shims to set the end float correctly. My bearing started squeaking as soon I got the car back on the road, but it was too late to save the hub. Now, mine is a 92 with ABS like yours and replaced it with a XJ6 III hub w/o sensor and used some of the shims of that car too. Those shims and hub (new) are very expensive and the wheel bearing and castellated nut were not on the cheap side either. In your case, I would stop driving any further to save that hub if it's not already to late.
 
Reply
Old May 15, 2019 | 09:31 PM
  #58  
purrkittypurr's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 52
Likes: 26
From: Las Vegas
Default

Hoodun,

For reference, here are a couple pictures of a rear end I've pulled out of a 96 XJS. The spacers measure 5mm. Note, caliper has been zeroed.



RH side in inches

RH side in mm

LH side in mm

Rear view of 1996 XJS, convertible, 6 cyl.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GordoCatCar
XK8 / XKR ( X100 )
4
Jan 2, 2017 01:10 PM
ym37tech
XJ XJ8 / XJR ( X308 )
18
Feb 8, 2016 01:04 PM
1LowCat
New Member Area - Intro a MUST
9
Sep 14, 2015 07:51 PM
Richard_gib
XJ6 & XJ12 Series I, II & III
16
Sep 12, 2015 07:08 PM
aktell
MKI / MKII S type 240 340 & Daimler
2
Sep 10, 2015 02:55 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:23 AM.