Help replacing Air Filter
#1
#2
You really should have your vehicle year and other info in your signature so people know what you're talking about.
4.2? 4.2 R?
5.0? 5.0 R?
R-S?
R-S GT?
Portfolio?
Dynamic R????
Anyway,
All -R models have two filters, one on each side
4.2 non-R have only one, left side (???)
All 5.0 have two.
Only the inside fender liner needs to be detached. Some people find it easier to remove the wheels. I do mine by raising the front and turning the wheels full-lock each way and folding back the front half of each liner to gain access to the air boxes. There are I think seven (five?) screws that need to be removed to do the fold-back.
I can get to both filters and have the car back down in around fifteen minutes. Take off the wheels and you add another ten minutes or so, depending on your tools/ability.
4.2? 4.2 R?
5.0? 5.0 R?
R-S?
R-S GT?
Portfolio?
Dynamic R????
Anyway,
All -R models have two filters, one on each side
4.2 non-R have only one, left side (???)
All 5.0 have two.
Only the inside fender liner needs to be detached. Some people find it easier to remove the wheels. I do mine by raising the front and turning the wheels full-lock each way and folding back the front half of each liner to gain access to the air boxes. There are I think seven (five?) screws that need to be removed to do the fold-back.
I can get to both filters and have the car back down in around fifteen minutes. Take off the wheels and you add another ten minutes or so, depending on your tools/ability.
Last edited by Cee Jay; 04-16-2019 at 12:24 PM.
The following users liked this post:
nigelrw (04-16-2019)
#3
#5
Stuart forgot to reference the numerous articles, videos and tests that show K&N filters trap more dirt while also flowing more air than brand new paper filters.
Anyone can prove anything if they only use supporting 'evidence'.
I did much research and found that the preponderance of the least bias sources indicated that there was zero deficiency in the K&N filters over paper, and that alone makes it worthwhile to use K&N over changing paper filters every year or whenever.
Is there actually any GAIN? Well, since there is no loss, even when dirty, K&Ns have my vote (money). Most tests by most evaluators do admit that K&Ns flow more, but then they try to negate the findings with faulty comparisons like "Dirty paper filters" vs brand new K&N. Yeah, that's not accurate, and probably produced by FOX nooz.
Anyone can prove anything if they only use supporting 'evidence'.
I did much research and found that the preponderance of the least bias sources indicated that there was zero deficiency in the K&N filters over paper, and that alone makes it worthwhile to use K&N over changing paper filters every year or whenever.
Is there actually any GAIN? Well, since there is no loss, even when dirty, K&Ns have my vote (money). Most tests by most evaluators do admit that K&Ns flow more, but then they try to negate the findings with faulty comparisons like "Dirty paper filters" vs brand new K&N. Yeah, that's not accurate, and probably produced by FOX nooz.
The following users liked this post:
badicedog (04-16-2019)
#6
The following users liked this post:
Tp10XKR (04-17-2019)
#8
#10
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Daniel.angeles001
X-Type ( X400 )
3
12-05-2018 08:58 AM
Blue Lion
S-Type / S type R Supercharged V8 ( X200 )
9
10-10-2012 04:55 PM
zibby_uk
X-Type ( X400 )
6
07-23-2011 02:27 AM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)